Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Amazon sues 10,000 Facebook groups over fake reviews

Add as a preferred source on Google

When it comes to reviews on Amazon and similar shopping sites, most people have by now developed their own approach to dealing with them.

Some use a blend of instinct and experience to decide if what they’re reading is genuine, while others scan a broad selection to try to get an overall feel for a product’s reputation. Of course, some folks simply ignore them altogether.

Recommended Videos

The simple fact is, it’s extremely challenging to properly determine if what we’re reading has been posted by a genuine customer or by someone paid to offer false praise.

Amazon has been fighting to keep bogus reviews off its site for years, and has invested huge amounts of money on automated and human-driven systems to try to keep on top of the situation.

The online shopping giant’s latest assault on fake reviews sees it suing the administrators of more than 10,000 Facebook groups that it accuses of organizing schemes involving fake reviews that end up on Amazon.

“These groups are set up to recruit individuals willing to post incentivized and misleading reviews on Amazon’s stores in the U.S., the U.K., Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and Japan,” the company said in a post on its website.

It added: “The fraudsters behind such groups solicit fake reviews for hundreds of products available for sale on Amazon, including car stereos and camera tripods.”

One of the Facebook groups mentioned in Amazon’s lawsuit is called Amazon Product Review. It had more than 43,000 members when Facebook-owned Meta kicked it off its platform earlier this year. Amazonsaid that the group’s administrators tried to hide their activity and evade detection by slightly altering the spelling of words in phrases designed to alert A.I.-powered software that searches for fake reviews.

Amazon said it has more than 12,000 employees globally working to protect its shopping site from fraud and abuse, including fake reviews.

Another Amazon-employed team is tasked with identifying fake review schemes on social media platforms that include Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter. Any abuse that’s spotted is then reported to those companies, which are expected to remove the nefarious content.

“Our teams stop millions of suspicious reviews before they’re ever seen by customers, and this lawsuit goes a step further to uncover perpetrators operating on social media,” Amazon executive Dharmesh Mehta said of its latest action. “Proactive legal action targeting bad actors is one of many ways we protect customers by holding bad actors accountable.”

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Meta used AI to make your Instagram feed harder to quit
Meta says its latest AI recommendation sytems are keeping people on Instagram longer by serving up more relevant Reels and Feed posts.
Instagram open on iPhone

Caught yourself scrolling on Instagram a lot longer lately? You're not imagining it. Meta just told investors what's driving that trend, and AI is at the center of it.

During its second-quarter earnings call, Meta said time spent on Instagram grew by double digits year over year after rolling out new AI-powered recommendation systems. According to the company, the biggest gains came from improvements to how it recommends Reels and other public content, making it easier to surface videos people are more likely to watch.

Read more
Meta’s latest courtroom losses expose a potential hole in social media’s strongest defense
Plaintiffs are treating engagement features as deliberately designed products, an argument that could make Section 230 far less useful
facebook

Two jury losses have given plaintiffs momentum against Meta, but they haven’t rewritten the rules for social media. One case relied on New Mexico consumer-protection laws. The other asked a California jury whether addictive design contributed to a young woman’s mental-health issues.

The verdicts, detailed by The Wall Street Journal, reached Meta through different legal routes. Together, they suggest Section 230 becomes a less dependable shield when a lawsuit centers on choices made by the platform itself.

Read more
Meta AI is moving into your Threads DMs, where awkward AI chats belong
Because not every AI conversation deserves a spot on your followers' timeline.
Meta AI in threads DM

One of the reasons Grok AI became so popular is because it let people chat with it directly on X, resulting in some hilarious conversations. And while the public availability of Grok AI on X has resulted in numerous safety issues, there's no denying that this openness played a major role in its rise. 

It seems Meta wanted the same, which became evident when the company started testing Meta AI directly on Threads a few months ago, letting users chat with it right in their feed. But not everyone was comfortable having those conversations out in the open, so Meta has just moved its Meta AI inside your Threads’ DMs. 

Read more