Skip to main content

Amazon card vs. Apple Card: Should you get a credit card from a tech company?

One hallmark of cashless Amazon Go stores was who you didn’t see shopping in them. Fifteen-year-olds couldn’t pop in to grab a bottle of water, unless they were using a parent’s Amazon account. Any of the millions of unbanked people weren’t welcome. Eventually, Amazon agreed to start accepting cash at these convenience stores — though it would rather you just sign up for its Credit Builder Card.

For those with bad credit or no credit history, secured cards let you build up your credit score. You put up a deposit, so the card issuer doesn’t assume the risk of you not being able to pay for what you purchase. It’s not unique to Amazon, but it’s somewhat unusual.

Recommended Videos

“You don’t see that many secured cards from retailers out in the market,” said Sara Rathner, NerdWallet’s credit card expert. The card gives 5 percent cashback on Amazon purchases for Prime members. To qualify, you need a $100 to $1,000 deposit, and that amount acts as a credit limit. “That could be pretty limiting for some people, especially if they use that card exclusively and they’re charging up a thousand dollars a month or more,” said Rathner.

After reliably paying off the card for seven months, Amazon will let qualified users upgrade to the Amazon.com Store Card. It’s not a secured card, so the deposit is returned. The Credit Builder card offers no interest if it’s paid in full over six, 12, or 24 months, depending on the amount. That being said, the interest rate for Amazon’s secured card is 28.24 percent. That’s quite high, even for a secured card. An 18-year-old who’s never had a credit card before may be unfamiliar with how minimum payments work, making a high interest rate risky.

“I could see a potential target audience for this new secured credit card among college students, because they’re building credit for the first time,” said Rathner. “They’re buying school supplies and personal care items on Amazon instead of going out to a store. And for them, the Prime membership is lower in price.” (It’s $119 for regular Prime membership but $59 for students.)  

The idea of a company-branded credit card isn’t new. “Some of the original credit cards were retail cards,” said Rathner. “You see tons of airline and hotel branded cards for people who like to travel.” With companies like Amazon and Apple partnering with banks (Synchrony in Amazon’s case,  Goldman Sachs and Mastercard for Apple), “it’s a way for banks to attract a different type of audience that they wouldn’t ordinarily get,” said Rathner.

While college kids, young parents, and others new to credit cards are Amazon’s audience, the Apple Card has another customer in mind. “The Apple card is targeted at a very different audience than the secured Amazon card,” said Rathner. “Forgive the fruit pun on the Apple card, but it’s kind of like comparing apples and oranges,” she said.

The Apple Card is titanium and comes with your name laser etched onto it. When you pay with the Apple Card using your iPhone or Apple Watch, you get 2 percent cash back, while Apple purchases give you 3 percent. Using the physical card gives you 1 percent back. “It looks like they’re really trying to nudge consumers into using Apple Wallet,” said Rathner. Because the Apple Card is targeted at those with longer credit histories, its interest rate will depend on credit scores and varies from 13.24 to 24.24 percent. 

If your finance app tells you that you’re spending a good chunk of income using your Prime membership — getting all your groceries delivered, for example — the Amazon card might make sense.

“If you’re loyal to a specific brand, like a tech company or a retailer, that’s when the card becomes potentially a better option for you because it’s where you spend more of your money,” said Rathner. “But if you’re not loyal to any particular brand, there are lots of rewards cards available that are more general.” If you’re looking for travel bonuses or buy just as often from Target as Amazon, these cards may not give you the same bang for your buck as other rewards cards.   

Updated 6/11/2019: Updated to reflect that Amazon Go shoppers didn’t need a Prime account, just an Amazon account.  

Jenny McGrath
Former Senior Writer, Home
Jenny McGrath is a senior writer at Digital Trends covering the intersection of tech and the arts and the environment. Before…
This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals
UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more
Apple TV+ just got a price slash that’s tough to resist, and it won’t last long
The Apple TV main screen.

Apple has just quietly announced that it will be slashing the price on its Apple TV+ offering for a limited time deal.

While Apple prices the service at a standard $9.99 per month usually, it has just cut that way down to $2.99 per month.

Read more