Skip to main content

Dyson racks up $25M in costs after building unwanted coronavirus ventilator

Dyson’s work on developing a ventilator to help critical coronavirus patients has ended unexpectedly.

The U.K.-based producer of vacuum cleaners and other home appliances designed its own ventilator in a matter of weeks in response to a nationwide call to bolster supplies of the sought-after breathing machine. The British government placed a provisional order for 10,000 units, but in recent days officials said they no longer required Dyson’s device as demand from health care facilities had been lower than expected.

Recommended Videos

Company founder Sir James Dyson said the project had cost it around $25 million, though the firm wouldn’t be seeking any public money for the effort. Instead, Dyson said he will foot the bill.

The billionaire entrepreneur said that while his team had welcomed the government’s challenge to build the ventilator and had no regrets about getting involved, “mercifully” his company’s machine was no longer needed.

A ventilator is a vital piece of equipment for patients who are struggling to breathe, a situation common with those experiencing the worst symptoms of the coronavirus, formally known as COVID-19. The machine, which gets oxygen into the lungs while removing carbon dioxide, has already played a critical role during the pandemic.

Dyson

A recent global surge in severe COVID-19 cases put significant pressure on the supply of ventilators, prompting an array of companies to offer help. Indeed, the British government, with a focus on deployment speed, is reportedly encouraging the production of an existing design rather than Dyson’s brand-new machine, which was awaiting regulatory approval. Had demand remained high, Dyson’s ventilator could still have been used in U.K. hospitals.

The country has been hit hard by the virus, with more than 20,000 deaths to date. Recent hospital data suggests, however, that the country has passed the peak of fatalities.

Dyson floated the idea that its newly designed ventilator could find use in other countries, though cautioned that it would require “further time and investigation.”

Thanking his team for its efforts, he said that everyone had worked “24/7 to design and manufacture a sophisticated ventilator in a short time frame,” adding, “I hope they can spend this weekend with their families who will not have seen them for weeks.”

It’s not the first project that’s ended unexpectedly for Dyson. In October 2019, the company abandoned a $2.7 billion plan to build a “radically different” electric car because if was unable to find a way to make it commercially viable.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals
UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more
Apple TV+ just got a price slash that’s tough to resist, and it won’t last long
The Apple TV main screen.

Apple has just quietly announced that it will be slashing the price on its Apple TV+ offering for a limited time deal.

While Apple prices the service at a standard $9.99 per month usually, it has just cut that way down to $2.99 per month.

Read more