Skip to main content

Genius Gila GX Review

Genius Gila GX
MSRP $100.00
“Genius hasn’t defeated Razer, Logitech, and other enthusiast favorites, but it can stand beside them.”
Pros
  • 8200 DPI sensor
  • Solid build quality
  • Useful driver software
  • Good value
Cons
  • Difficult button placement
  • Ergonomics could be better

You probably haven’t heard the name Genius much in the world of gaming peripherals. Though not a new company, Genius has never been well known in North America and is just now making a serious push into the gaming market. Genius joins companies like Corsair and Cooler Master in challenging veterans such as Logitech, Razer, and MadCatz, and giving gamers more choice than ever before.

Genius, aware of the war waged for gamer’s hearts and wallets, has crafted a focused peripheral that makes no apologies and cuts no corners. Everything we could want is here, including a high-DPI sensor, on-the-fly sensitivity adjustment, numerous buttons with macro support, slick LED lighting, and even built-in memory that stores your settings (so you don’t have to re-adjust the mouse when you plug it in to a different PC). The insane feature set earned the mouse a CES Design And Engineering Award at CES 2013.

Even more impressive is the price. Though the MSRP is $100, which would be fair for a mouse with these features, the Gila GX can be purchased through Amazon for close to $75, and can be found on sale at other retailers for even less. Let’s see if Genius can compete with gaming’s old guard.

Muscle mouse

Gaming mice are known for their flair, but the Gila GX takes it to an extreme that’s rivaled only by Razer. There are no less than six individual LED-lit areas on the mouse – not including the sensitivity indicator – and even more sharp edges. The mouse even has a scorpion logo plastered on its rump (‘cause it’s just that bad ass).

All of these bumps and ridges risk coming across as cheesy, but the Gila has the build quality to back them up. This is a tight, compact, robust mouse. Though made entirely of plastic, like most mice, there’s no flop or wiggle to various panels and details. Every button feels well-sprung and the scroll wheel moves with a satisfying thunk-thunk-thunk that’s both reassuring and perfect for weapon-selection in shooters. The Gila is a hefty piece of kit, as well, even without the optional weights added.

Ergonomic hand-aches

While the engineers obviously thought about quality, they could have thought more about ergonomics. Subjectively, we found the mouse to be a bit too small and too tall for our hands. Long usage sessions gave us a mid-palm cramp that we’ve experienced with other mice of similar size.

Other issues were less subject to taste. The Gila’s many stylish edges and humps became uncomfortable as they brushed across and dug into our palms. This problem was most obvious when playing games that required a lot of fast movement, which encourage a tight grip on the mouse itself.

We’re also not fond of the button placement. The M3 and M4 buttons could only be activated by our ring finger, which felt imprecise; and the M5 and M6 buttons could only be reached by contorting our index finger into an uncomfortable position. The index finger usually resides on the left mouse button, as well, so the M5 and M6 buttons can’t be used while clicking.

Headshot!

One of the Gila’s standout features is an 8200 DPI sensor with on-the-fly adjustment. Sensitive sensors are common on gaming mice, but 8200 DPI puts the Gila in the company of extreme products like the Mionix Naos and Roccat Kone. Only Logitech’s recently introduced G600 offers equivalent sensitivity at a lower price.

A sensitive sensor is great for the most hardcore gamers, but those who don’t make money from tournaments will find the mouse too touchy. This is addressed by the Gila’s 6-mode sensitivity button. In a shooter game, for example, we found the Gila’s highest sensitivity far too touchy for lining up a headshot. We were able to fix the problem by lowering the sensor’s sensitivity, yet we could crank it up if we had to whip around to fight an ambush.

gx gila gaming mouse bottom sensor macro
Image used with permission by copyright holder

While we like most of the options made available by this mouse, we’re not crazy about one feature called Angle Snapping. This feature allegedly flattens jerky motions at high sensitivity to help with accuracy in games. We didn’t notice an improvement in-game with it on, however, and the feature seemed to make movements in the desktop environment less accurate than normal. Fortunately, the Gila’s driver software provides the option to turn off Angle Snapping.

Customization aplenty

There’s plenty of customization offered here, but most must be handled through a custom software interface bundled with the mouse. Poor implementation could shoot the Gila dead – thankfully, it dodges the bullet.

Genius crafted a focused peripheral that makes no apologies and cuts no corners.

The software is okay. It’s nothing special; it’s just there. But competitors in this space have a nasty habit of botching this rather basic feature with software that is unstable, slow, or confusing. The Gila suffers from none of these problems. It offers access to all features in a reasonably quick, intuitive interface. Only the Macro settings menu is a bit fuzzy, but we’ve yet to see a macro interface in any software that’s not a little confusing.

And then there’s the lighting menu. Gila’s LEDs are broken up into three zones, each of which can be customized to display one of 16 million sRGB colors. Users can adjust light intensity or make each lighting zone pulse at one of three speeds.

Conclusion

A mouse is an item that may be used for hours at a time, so it should be smooth, comfortable, and easy to handle. The Gila proved a bit too harsh and heavy to win over our palms.

Button placement is another concern. Genius bills this mouse as suitable for MMOs, but several buttons are awkwardly placed. Razer’s Naga and Logitech’s M600, both of which put buttons under the user’s thumb, are easier to use.

As a general gaming mouse, however, the Gila is a decent choice. The features offered, from 8200 DPI sensor to built-in memory, are excellent for a mouse that sells for $75 or less online. Competitors that offer everything found on this mouse cost at least as much, if not $15 to $25 more. Yet, going for the inexpensive Gila doesn’t require a sacrifice in build quality. This thing is built like a tank.

Genius hasn’t defeated Razer, Logitech, and other enthusiast favorites, but it can stand beside them. The Gila GX is worth consideration by any gamer looking for the ultimate mouse.

Highs:

  • 8200 DPI sensor
  • Solid build quality
  • Useful driver software
  • Good value

Lows:

  • Difficult button placement
  • Ergonomics could be better

Editors' Recommendations

Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
How Intel and Microsoft are teaming up to take on Apple
An Intel Meteor Lake system-on-a-chip.

It seems like Apple might need to watch out, because Intel and Microsoft are coming for it after the latter two companies reportedly forged a close partnership during the development of Intel Lunar Lake chips. Lunar Lake refers to Intel's upcoming generation of mobile processors that are aimed specifically at the thin and light segment. While the specs are said to be fairly modest, some signs hint that Lunar Lake may have enough of an advantage to pose a threat to some of the best processors.

Today's round of Intel Lunar Lake leaks comes from Igor's Lab. The system-on-a-chip (SoC), pictured above, is Intel's low-power solution made for thin laptops that's said to be coming out later this year. Curiously, the chips weren't manufactured on Intel's own process, but on TSMC's N3B node. This is an interesting development because Intel typically sticks to its own fabs, and it even plans to sell its manufacturing services to rivals like AMD. This time, however, Intel opted for the N3B node for its compute tile.

Read more
How much does an AI supercomputer cost? Try $100 billion
A Microsoft datacenter.

It looks like OpenAI's ChatGPT and Sora, among other projects, are about to get a lot more juice. According to a new report shared by The Information, Microsoft and OpenAI are working on a new data center project, one part of which will be a massive AI supercomputer dubbed "Stargate." Microsoft is said to be footing the bill, and the cost is astronomical as the name of the supercomputer suggests -- the whole project might cost over $100 billion.

Spending over $100 billion on anything is mind-blowing, but when put into perspective, the price truly shows just how big a venture this might be: The Information claims that the new Microsoft and OpenAI joint project might cost a whopping 100 times more than some of the largest data centers currently in operation.

Read more
There’s an unexpected, new competitor in PC gaming
Snapdragon's X Elite PC SoC.

Windows gaming on ARM is becoming a legitimate possibility, and it's not just thanks to the recently unveiled emulation options, but it's chiefly due to the fact that Qualcomm's Snapdragon X Elite is shaping up to be pretty excellent. Spotted in a recent benchmark, the CPU was seen beating some of the best processors on the current market. Are we finally at a point where it's not always going to be a choice between just Intel and AMD?

The benchmarks were posted by user @techinmul on Twitter, and the results couldn't be more promising for the upcoming Qualcomm processor. The chip was tested in Geekbench 6, and although it's important not to take these results entirely at face value, it's an impressive show of performance that bodes well for upcoming thin and light laptops.

Read more