Skip to main content

Tech advocates say Trump’s executive order could ruin the internet

President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Thursday that seeks to remove the protections of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, making social networks and internet services responsible for what people post on their platforms.

Even with an executive order, a fundamental change to Section 230 is far away. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) or Federal Communications Commission (FCC) would need to approve new interpretations of the clause and take new enforcement actions to give it teeth, and it would require congressional approval. But, the tech industry is still wary of what a world would look like without Section 230’s protections.

Related Videos

‘Chilling’ free speech

Daniel Castro, the vice president of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a nonprofit that focuses on public policy and technological innovation,  said internet giants losing their Section 230 protections would have troubling effects.

“The long-term impact of such retaliatory policies would be a chilling of free speech online, especially counter-speech, a rise in disinformation, and a decline in innovative social media platforms,” Castro said.

We would have a very different version of social media as we know it today if Section 230 were to be removed, agreed John Bergmayer, the Legal Director at Public Knowledge, a nonprofit that promotes freedom of expression.

Bergmayer said there are two likely outcomes in a world without Section 230. The first would allow social networks to be an unmoderated free-for-all, making them unusable. The second would be an overly-moderated platform, which would also make them unusable.

In theory, live-tweeting would become all but impossible, since Twitter moderators would have to look at each tweet before it is published, he said.

The same goes for every Facebook post or YouTube video; human beings or algorithms would have to review them before they go public. With billions of users and posts, that’s an enormous — if not impossible — task.

“There’s just such a volume of posts on social networks that the idea of a human editor judging everything before running it is just not possible,” Bergmayer said.

Still, there have been bipartisan calls to look into regulating social media’s influence. With the internet dominated by big tech companies like Facebook, Google, and Twitter, some argue it’s time to rethink how much power these platforms have.

“Now that social networks are so powerful, with that power comes responsibility,” said Zohar Levkovitz, CEO of anti-toxicity company L1ght. “Social networks are the only product we are consuming where no one is liable for our safety,” he said.

Bergmayer agrees that social media networks have too much power, but said that government regulation in the form of Trump’s executive order isn’t the answer.

“If we limit to having the government decide whether or not you’ve made a subjective judgment call on a comment or post, it’s not a feasible enterprise for anyone,” Bergmayer said.

Editors' Recommendations

Elon Musk says Twitter character limit will increase hugely
Twitter logo in white stacked on top of a blue stylized background with the Twitter logo repeating in shades of blue.

Elon Musk, the man who bought Twitter for $44 billion at the end of October, says the social media platform is planning to up the limit for tweets to 4,000 characters, a significant increase on the current 280-character limit.

Responding to an inquiry on Twitter from someone asking if it’s true "that Twitter is set to increase the characters from 280 to 4000," Musk replied, “Yes,” but declined to offer any additional information, such as when the change will take place. It's also unclear as to whether longer tweets will only be available to subscribers of Twitter Blue, Twitter's premium tier that's set to relaunch sign-ups on Monday.

Read more
Twitter’s downfall made me look for alternatives, but they just made it worse
Twitter app on the OnePlus 10T.

Twitter is the only social network I’ve ever stuck with and enjoyed, but this has changed since Elon Musk took ownership of the company. The influence he has on it and its content has altered the posts I see, the people who regularly contribute, and the entire platform’s future. While some will welcome the changes, it has made Twitter less enjoyable for me — and prompted me to look for an alternative.

But the ones I’ve tried are simply not good enough and don’t have the same appeal that has kept me returning to Twitter for more than a decade. The shambles around Twitter and its alternatives has ended up making me rethink the way I feel about social media entirely, and perhaps for the better.
Trying to understand Mastodon

Read more
What does the lock mean on Snapchat?
A person using Snapchat on an iPhone.

If you're new to Snapchat (or just a casual Snapchat user), you might not be aware of all of its features, including a certain lock-shaped icon. If you've ever wondered what that little lock icon means on Snapchat, you've come to the right place. In this guide, we'll explain what the lock is for and how it's connected to a Snapchat feature.
What does the lock mean on Snapchat?
In Snapchat, that lock icon indicates that the Snapchat story you're seeing is what's known as a Private Story.
What exactly is a Private Story?

A Private Story is a type of Snapchat story that allows the Snapchatter who posts it to restrict that story's visibility to only a few, select friends. That is to say, if you post a Private Story, you can choose which of your friends can see it. Additionally, the only user who can invite other users to it or add Snaps to a Private Story is the user who created the Private Story in the first place.

Read more