Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Zuckerberg stands by Facebook’s policies as employees revolt, quit

Add as a preferred source on Google
 

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg isn’t backing down from his decision not to moderate President Donald Trump’s recent controversial Facebook messages.

Recommended Videos

In a virtual town hall meeting Tuesday, Zuckerberg said that his decision had been a “tough” one to make but said the decision process “was pretty thorough,” according to the New York Times.

Zuckerberg reportedly said that the “right action” at present is to “leave [Trump’s words] up” on Facebook.

“I knew that I would have to separate out my personal opinion,” he continued. “Knowing that when we made this decision we made, it was going to lead to a lot of people upset inside the company, and the media criticism we were going to get.”

Trump’s comments, in which the president declared “when the looting starts, the shooting starts,” were hidden behind a warning by social media competitor Twitter for glorifying violence. Zuckerberg, however, has said Trump’s statements won’t be moderated on his platform.

Zuckerberg publicly defended Facebook’s decision to not remove Trump’s messages by arguing that he believes in free speech. Zuckerberg also said that the messages posted online by world leaders are newsworthy and in the public interest.

Zuckerberg’s response has been heavily criticized, with hundreds of employees refusing to work Monday in protest and publicly voicing their criticism on Twitter.

His virtual town hall Tuesday appeared to have not calmed divisions inside the company, with one employee tweeting during the call: “It’s crystal clear today that leadership refuses to stand with us.”

Another worker, Facebook software engineer Timothy Aveni, resigned Tuesday ahead of the town hall, slamming the social media giant for its policies.

“I cannot stand by Facebook’s continued refusal to act on the president’s bigoted messages aimed at radicalizing the American public,” Aveni said in a widely shared post. “I’m scared for my country, and I’m watching my company do nothing to challenge the increasingly dangerous status quo.”

Aveni had been employed at Facebook since June 2019, shortly after graduating from the Georgia Institute of Technology. He described his job at Facebook as “battling the spread of misinformation.”

Want more news, reviews, guides, and features from Digital Trends? Follow us on Apple News, Google News, and Flipboard.

Luke Dormehl
I'm a UK-based tech writer covering Cool Tech at Digital Trends. I've also written for Fast Company, Wired, the Guardian…
Meta’s new AI can generate images of you from your Instagram, and you’re opted in 
Meta's approach to Instagram likeness rights with Muse Image raises questions that a watermark alone doesn't answer.
Instagram Muse Image

Meta launched Muse Image on July 7, 2026, and while it’s an exciting development, buried inside all the announcements is something that deserves a closer look. 

If your Instagram account is public, strangers can use your photos to generate AI images of you via Muse Image. More importantly, it's switched on by default.

Read more
Meta’s new image and video AI tools let you turn Instagram into your creative mood board
Two models, one launch, and an Instagram trick nobody else has.
Art, Collage, Face

Meta has been cooking something up, and today, it finally put it on the table. On July 7, 2026, Meta Superintelligence Labs launched Muse Image and Muse Video (in preview), its first in-house media generation models. 

The rollout comes with a few features that are genuinely hard to argue with.

Read more
Social media ban for young users is proving to be an age verification nightmare
A fake birthday is enough to beat Australia's social media ban on teens.
Social media apps on smartphone

Australia’s world-first teen social media ban was supposed to keep children under 16 away from popular platforms, including Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, and X. While this was a major controversial change, it appears that getting around it was barely even a challenge.

Researchers created 50 test accounts across nine of the ten platforms covered by the law. Each account claimed its user was 16, the minimum permitted age. None of the platforms asked the researchers to provide proof or complete another age-assurance check. Only the Australian livestreaming platform Kick refused to create an account without a proper age verification.

Read more