Skip to main content

Opinion: Is CES even relevant anymore?

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Unless something changes, CES 2012 will be the first time I couldn’t justify going to the show. In many ways, CES reminds me of why Comdex failed. I was actually on the advisory panel for Comdex when the decision was made to kill it. (As a side note the panel got pounded for the decision to kill the show even though that one decision was made without consulting us. I still think it could have been fixed.) In any case, as I looked at CES this year, I realized there wasn’t going to be anything really new or amazing at it. The biggest presentation was likely to be on Windows 8, and I’m pretty much up to speed on that offering. Even in that case, the critical presentation likely won’t occur until the beta actually starts, well after CES ends.

CES remains a very successful show, but let’s talk about why its relevance is declining.


The “C” in CES is for consumer, and the heavyweight in the consumer market is now Apple. It not only doesn’t attend CES, it abandoned MacWorld. Apple didn’t want to be event driven, and wanted to be product driven when it came to announcements. When Apple does announce, it doesn’t want to be buried under a ton of other announcements. CES is like that; generally a huge number of folks either announce late or early altogether. The last, biggest announcement wins, but not by much. It is like watching a bunch of moths flying after someone lighting candles. The reporters and analysts are constantly trying to cover the latest shiny object, and not able to give much depth to any of it.

Apple likes to shine, and CES, because of its massive size, doesn’t allow any one vendor to shine for long. Apple used to eclipse the show with announcements they made during it at other venues (ironically, MacWorld).


CES is a fall show; it is intended to be a place where retailers and distributors can go to find out about fall lines. This made a lot of sense when the market moved more slowly, but now the market not only moves fast, it is based around the fourth quarter. Most vendors not only aren’t ready to show fall lines in January, they don’t want to, for fear a competitor will get wind of them and copy the product. This forces a lot of the vendors off the show floor and into private, secure rooms. Even then, they are showing early prototypes that may not represent what they eventually will decide to bring to market.

In addition we live on the Web these days, and presentations of new products can often be given using conferencing tools closer to when the buyers want to make buying decisions, and the products are actually more complete. Folks on both sides are not only better informed on products and needs, they are less pressured, and appear to make better decisions as a result.

In short, actual business is increasingly done away from the show.

Parties and dinners

CES remains a good place for parties and dinners so that folks can meet their opposite numbers and set up appointments for later in the year, when stuff is ready. But this is exactly what Comdex eventually became, and at some point the folks holding the checkbooks start to question funding boondoggles tied to trips to the party capital of the world (likely because they can’t go themselves). Still, it becomes a valid objection, and since less and less actual business is being done, it’s an increasingly hard one to overcome.

Is CES the new Comdex?

Just because I’m not going doesn’t mean the death of CES. I’m not that self-important yet. However, I am noticing vendors pull back from the show, which was what initially got me to rethink going. In discussions while I was reaching my decision, it was clear that they too were thinking that this might be their own last show, and shared that their firms were pulling back funding from the event. If CES is to survive into the next decade, it will need to become relevant again. To do that, planner may have to rethink every aspect of what has become a show that is just big enough to fail.

If you go to the show, let me know if you think it was worth it this year. Who knows, I may rethink my own decision, and decide to go again in 2013.

Guest contributor Rob Enderle is the founder and principal analyst for the Enderle Group, and one of the most frequently quoted tech pundits in the world. Opinion pieces denote the opinions of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of Digital Trends.

Rob Enderle
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Rob is President and Principal Analyst of the Enderle Group, a forward-looking emerging technology advisory firm. Before…
Halo Infinite’s talkative Grunts are bad stand-up comedians
halo infinite grunts

I've played every mainline Halo title, with the exception of Halo 5, and have always been bothered by one thing: The Grunts. They are are a cannon fodder enemy type that is meant to fill in ranks and give players something they can mow down without much thought when not facing off against tougher enemies like Elites. In the early days of the series, they were a perfectly fine enemy that was fun to melee attack. They made goofy sounds when attacked, which injected a bit of levity into an otherwise melodramatic series.

It wasn't long before the developers doubled down on that joke, making them more explicitly comedic with one-liners. Grunt humor has always been hit-or-miss, but Halo Infinite takes the hackiness to an overbearing level at the expense of the game's tone.
Grunts are not funny

Read more
Halo Infinite has what it takes to thrive as an esports game
Halo Infinite capture the flag.

While I have been a gamer for my entire life, it was actually very early esports that got me to take the medium seriously. When I was playing Counter-Strike 1.6 at far younger than I should have been, my friend and I would head over to a local gaming café where we would play in small tournaments or casual matches with whoever was around. Later on, it was seeing Halo 2 tournaments hosted by MLG on TV that got me to buy an Xbox and start playing console games online for the first time. I followed the competitive Halo scene up until the end of the Halo 3 days and then ... just kind of fell off.

Esports changed after that, or at least it felt like they did. There were still some first-person shooters doing tournaments, but all the attention seemed to have shifted to MOBAs around that time. Games like DOTA 2 and League of Legends have hosted the biggest Esport tournaments of all time, with giant cash prizes and even bigger viewer numbers.

Read more
The pandemic forced fighting games to grow up in 2021
fighting game growth 2021 kof15 screenshot

Fighting games are one of the most iconic gaming genres out there. From the arcades and cabinet-to-cabinet bouts with Street Fighter 2 to home consoles featuring online netplay across the country with Street Fighter 5, these titles and more like them have become engrained in gaming culture.

Despite how important fighting games are to the medium's history, the genre hadn't really grown up much since its arcade days. That was especially apparent in their archaic online implementation, which was holding back their potential. It wasn't until the COVID-19 pandemic that the genre was forced to modernize and finally act its age.
Staying competitive
For quite some time, fighting game fans have sat on the sidelines and watched as games like Fortnite, Dota, League of Legends, and more receive endless support and great online capabilities. That support turns into profit for the companies making them as it keeps their player base active. A dedicated audience means more prize pool money in esports tournaments and competitive support from the companies. The same can't be said for the fighting genre.

Read more