Terms & Conditions: Congress has privacy policies in its sights with CISPA

Terms and Conditions CISPA

The purpose of Terms & Conditions is to parse through the terms of service and privacy polices of online sites or services. We at Digital Trends think this is important because these documents are legal contracts by which users and the company must abide. Privacy policies in particular tell us how our personal information will be collected and used by the company in question, providing us with protection in case the company violates its own rules. But thanks to a bill currently making its way through Congress, the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2013 (CISPA), the legal weight of all privacy polices may soon dwindle faster than a liposuction patient. So, for this week’s T&C, we’ll cut through the legal jargon of CISPA to see what the bill may mean for the future of online privacy rights.

CISPA, in short

CISPA is a cybersecurity bill that would allow for greater sharing of “cyber threat information” (CTI) between the federal government and businesses. Companies (like Facebook, Google, or Digital Trends) would be free to share CTI with the government, but would not be required to do so. The bill would also allow the federal government to more easily share classified information with businesses.

CISPA was originally introduced in 2012. The bill passed the House of Representatives the first time around, but failed to pass the Senate. Co-sponsors of the bill, Reps Mike Rogers (R-MI) and Dutch Ruppersberger (D-MD), reintroduced the bill in February. CISPA passed the House on Thursday with a vote of 288 to 127.

The anti-CISPA position

Despite its seeming popularity in the House, CISPA remains enemy number one for civil liberty and Internet freedom advocates, who argue that the bill is too broadly written, allowing the government – especially secretive military sectors, like the National Security Agency (NSA) – to get their mitts on citizens’ personal information. 

“CISPA’s information sharing regime allows the transfer of vast amounts of data, including sensitive information like Internet records of the contents of emails, to any agency in the government including the military and intelligence agencies like the National Security Administration or the Department of Cyber Command,” wrote a coalition of citizen rights groups in a letter (PDF) to Congress opposing CISPA last month. “Once in government hands, this information can be used for undefined ‘national security’ purposes unrelated to cyber security.”

At the heart of the CISPA opposition is a provision that allows companies to share CTI with “any other entity, including the federal government” with complete impunity – “not withstanding any other provision of law” – which means that companies that share CTI may not be sued or convicted of criminal wrongdoing, no matter what any other law or their own privacy policies say. This is the reason CISPA is problematic.

The pro-CISPA position

Champions of CISPA say the bill is necessary to protect U.S. critical infrastructure networks – things like electrical and water supply systems – from being attacked through computer network. Furthmore, CISPA supporters firmly reject the idea that the bill would hurt individual privacy or Internet freedom. 

“The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act allows us to take that first critical step of sharing information in a way that is effective but still protects our civil liberties,” wrote Rep. Rogers in a US News & World Report op-ed on Wednesday. “… Most importantly, under the bill, information sharing by the private sector is voluntary, with strong controls to ensure that personal information is protected. It allows only information directly pertaining to threats or vulnerabilities to be shared for the explicit purpose of protecting systems and networks from such threats, and it allows those in the private sector to minimize or anonymize the information shared based on their own determination of what is minimally necessary to address those threats.” 

In addition to its support in Congress, CISPA enjoys backing from major U.S. telecommunications providers, including AT&T and Verizon, as well as that of lobbying organizations that represent companies like Google and Amazon. 

What happens next with CISPA?

CISPA will now move to the Senate for debate. Like last year’s movement over CISPA, however, the bill faces an increasingly steep uphill battle. The most powerful CISPA opponent is President Barack Obama who issued a veto threat (PDF) on the basis that it “fails to provide authorities to ensure that the nation’s core critical infrastructure is protected while repealing important provisions” of privacy law. 

In addition, Internet freedom group Fight for the Future has launched a campaign to get Rep. Rogers, who recently characterized CISPA opponents as a “14-year-old tweeter in the basement,” to debate an actual 14-year-old over the merits of the legislation.

The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not reflect the beliefs of Digital Trends.

Computing

iTunes had to die to be reborn, and it’s making me nostalgic

Apple’s decision to kill off iTunes-as-we-know-it, as announced during WWDC 2019, makes me nostalgic because I still rely on iTunes today for the same reason it was created back in 2001.
Computing

How the Mac Pro’s modular internals prophesy a new future for PC design

Apple's new Mac Pro is here and it looks set to offer video editors a perfect blend of sheer power and expansive expandability. But what if the changes in Apple's new system bleed through into the PC industry as a whole?
Computing

The new Mac Pro was the only way to save the Mac from the iPad’s killing blow

The Mac Pro and the iPad were in the spotlight this year at WWDC 2019. Why? Well, the two products paint an interesting picture about the future of both platforms and where Apple is headed with them.
Mobile

As Google keeps racing ahead, where is Apple’s A.I. strategy?

The contrast between Google’s I/O developer conference and Apple’s WWDC on the topic of artificial intelligence is stark, but what does it mean? We take a look at how Apple has fallen behind and what it might do to catch up.
Movies & TV

Why choose? Disney Plus and Netflix are the peanut butter and jelly of streaming

Instead of debating which streaming video service is better, we should instead be talking about how Netflix and Disney Plus are two equally great and totally different streaming options that will go even better together.
Gaming

Google Stadia’s platform for everyone promise is already broken

Google Stadia, the upcoming cloud gaming service, pitches itself on accessibility. It's a platform for everyone, playable on any screen. Except that's not quite true. Stadia has many restrictions, terms, and conditions.
Mobile

Sign In with Apple sticks it to Google and Facebook, for the good of everyone

Apple wants you to use its new Sign In with Apple service, which promises to free you from password hell, without selling your soul to the advertising devil. Is it worth using when it launches this year?
Features

Orwell’s 1984 was nothing like actual 1984. But it’s exactly like 2019

70 years ago today, George Orwell published 1984: a dystopian novel that sat squarely in the realm of fiction at the time it was published. Today, however, the book is an astonishingly accurate depiction of the world we live in now -- and…
Gaming

Microsoft's Xbox Project Scarlett console is awesome, and it doesn't matter

Microsoft has set a release date for Project Scarlett, its next-generation game console. It promises incredible performance, stunning 8K visuals, and lightning-quick load times -- but none of that matters. The console's relevance is waning.
Cars

BMW’s i8 Roadster is the Mazda Miata of hybrids. And I mean that in a good way

The i8 Roadster is not best in class for power, speed, or outright abilities. What is does offer is some of the best driving fun for the money. Sounds exactly like the Mazda MX-5 Miata to us.
Gaming

Ubisoft says its games ignore politics. So why are they so political?

Prior to E3, Ubisoft reiterated again that it doesn't make political statements in games. At its press conference, however, we saw previews of Watch Dogs Legion and Ghost Recon Blackpoint that suggest otherwise.
Computing

The true advantage of AMD’s next-gen chips isn’t power, it’s platforms

AMD announced some impressive new processors and GPUs at E3 this week, with plenty of muscle to flex. But the real strength of AMD in the future isn't its power or even its price. It's cross-platform scalability.
Computing

I bought a four-year-old MacBook Pro instead of a new one. Here’s why

The new MacBook Pros have a ton of advantages over the older options, but when it came to buying a replacement machine for myself, I found myself returning to 2015 rather than picking up Apple's latest and greatest.
Opinion

Tim Cook said Silicon Valley built a chaos factory. Are Apple’s hands clean?

The King of Silicon Valley just called it a “chaos factory.” Giving a commencement speech at Stanford University, Apple CEO Tim Cook criticized his fellow tech giants for disregarding the privacy of their customers.