Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Audio / Video
  4. Mobile
  5. Social Media
  6. Web
  7. News

Periscope’s new live moderation tool could revolutionize abuse and spam reporting

Add as a preferred source on Google

Twitter’s live-streaming app, Periscope, has introduced a new method of reporting abuse and spam in the comments section of a broadcast.

The user-led approach will rely on the audience of a real-time broadcast to review messages they deem to be obscene or junk. The Periscope community’s decision will result in blocks being placed on the activity of abusive users.

Recommended Videos

Here’s how it works: When you tune into a live stream, you will see the usual flurry of viewer comments stacking up on the left hand side of your smartphone screen. If you spot a post that you think is offensive, you can flag it as spam or abuse. Additionally, the system itself may target messages carrying phrases that it thinks fit in to those categories.

periscope_comments
Periscope’s new moderation tool in action Image used with permission by copyright holder

In both cases, the alleged violation will be presented to a selection of viewers in the form of a vote. If the majority decides that the comment is abuse or spam, the perpetrator will have their ability to chat disabled temporarily. Repeat offenders will be completely restricted from chatting during the remainder of the live stream. As previously mentioned, all this will occur in real time during the course of a live video.

However, both broadcasters and viewers can choose not to participate in the moderation process. The person hosting the live stream can opt out of having their broadcasts moderated altogether, and viewers can choose not be part of the jury committee in their settings.

“We’ve designed this system to be very lightweight – the entire process above should last just a matter of seconds,” states Periscope in a blog post. “We’re committed to developing tools to keep Periscope a safe and open place for people to connect in real time.”

What seems like a simple enough process could not have come at a better time for the app. Over the past few years, social media sites — including Periscope’s parent company, Twitter — have been repeatedly condemned for not appropriately dealing with trolls and bots on their respective services. If Periscope’s live moderation tool is a success, it could be adapted to fit other platforms in the future.

Although the jury is still out on the new feature, the moderation method, which is touted as “transparent” and democratic by the live-streaming app, could end up revolutionizing the way users report abuse and harassment online. Judging by its ongoing rivalry with Twitter, you can be sure that Facebook Live will be paying close attention to the Periscope update.

Saqib Shah
Saqib Shah is a Twitter addict and film fan with an obsessive interest in pop culture trends. In his spare time he can be…
Pixel 11 Pro XL vs. Galaxy S26 Ultra: Do you want smarter AI or more powerful hardware?
Two flagships, two philosophies, and one very difficult choice.
Electronics, Phone, Mobile Phone

Google and Samsung aren’t just creating flagship smartphones. They’re building different philosophies for what “flagship” means, how “smart” a smartphone should actually be, and what cost you should pay for a top-tier experience. That would be the major theme in this comparison between the newly-launched Pixel 11 Pro XL, which goes on sale from August 20, 2026, and Samsung’s Galaxy S26 Ultra, which is already available in the market. 

While Google’s new software and AI-based features seem all about killing third-party apps for specific use cases, the Galaxy S26 Ultra leans into raw hardware power and productivity tools to assert its dominance. The reason to choose one, in my opinion, has nothing to do with the difference in the specifications, and everything to do with the type of flagship experience you value more. 

Read more
I am a Google Pixel owner, and I am tired of being an unpaid QA tester
Google Pixel 10 Pro in the official silicon case

Unboxing a flagship smartphone used to feel like a solved equation. You paid top dollar, handed over your credit card, and received a fully baked piece of hardware capable of navigating basic daily life without a thermal meltdown.

Last month, standing under direct sunlight in 45-degree weather, my partner held her $1,000 Pixel 10 Pro up to my car's air conditioning vent just so Google Maps wouldn't shut down mid-route. It wasn't rendering 3D ray-traced graphics or exporting 8K video. I was simply following GPS directions while listening to a podcast - a routine task my three-year-old iPhone 15 handled without breaking a sweat. Rest assured, Google Maps did take us to the wrong address in the end.

Read more
Pixel 11 vs Pixel 10 series: Do Google’s new phones offer enough for an upgrade?
I compared the Pixel 11 series to the Pixel 10, and here's what you should know before buying
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

Google’s Pixel 11 family is here, and on paper, it fixes several things I wanted to see improved from the Pixel 10 generation. Tensor G6 promises a meaningful performance bump on all four models, while Google has upgraded cameras throughout the lineup, along with faster charging, and the Pro models get brighter and tougher displays. The Pixel 11 Pro Fold also undergoes much-needed design refinements.

These are some solid improvements for an annual update to Google's flagship lineup. But whether they justify replacing a Pixel 10 you bought a year ago is a different question. Having covered and used enough annual smartphone refreshes over the years, here's who should actually make the upgrade.

Read more