Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Web
  4. Legacy Archives

Code reveals Google+ expecting additions: Questions, Games, Circles, and more

Add as a preferred source on Google
google-plus-mobile-app-logos
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Google+1 has arrived. While a great many of us are still crossing our fingers for an invite or trying to find a “proactive” way to get one, there’s been a general consensus that it’s a cool project and very possibly Google’s most successful step into social networking yet. But it’s still not Facebook and if it plans to seriously compete with the site, Google+ has an uphill battle.

Which is why, even before the verdict is completely in on the application, we’re talking about what’s next. Google+ code reveals a few things that are in the works for the platform, as Austrian blogger Florian Rohrweck discovered (Rohrweck also calls out Engadget for grabbing his story without properly crediting its origins).

Recommended Videos

via Rohrwerk Google+ Questions

Q&A has been an Internet hit recently, with Quora leading the way and Facebook rebooting its Questions platform. Naturally if Google’s giving social a go, it would want to include such a feature. According to Rohrwerk, Google+ Questions is in final testing. An icon for a Questions service has been revealed, although there’s little else known about it thus far.

Our vote: Interesting and fun, but we’re not sure it would be a huge impetus for joining or keeping Google+.

Google+ Games

Last week we reported that a Google job posting revealed the company is looking for someone to head a division called Games at Google. Even more crucial to a competitive social network than a Q&A platform is social gaming, and the code that has surfaced shows Google’s awareness of this. A chess icon may indicate some sort of interactive, social gaming element will be woven into Google+, which is mostly supported by last weeks’ news.

via Rohrwerk Our vote: If Google wants to compete in this arena, a social gaming feature is important.

Shared Circles

It seems like there isn’t a whole lot of certainty to what Shared Circles will be, but it looks like a method to share specified information with your Google+ contacts. You can create certain “circles” of information to share with contacts – basically, as Rohrwerk puts it, this feature would let you create interest groups. It sounds a lot like Facebook’s Groups or Twitter’s lists, and honestly we hope this is one feature that actually sees the light of day. Giving users some way to organize Google+ accounts would make it much more attractive to those that want to use it for more serious networking purposes. It would also let you see what your Circle contacts were doing with your profile – an interesting idea, and makes us think it would be a success based on how many times people fall for the old “Download this app and see who views your Facebook profile!” liner.

Google’s Social Circle is something of a nightmare right now: It’s anything but user-friendly, completely unintuitive, and pretty foreign and pointless for most Google account holders. This would be a necessary upgrade. You wouldn’t have to create your own circles either, instead using someone else’s as a jumping off point.

Our vote: Yes please! Social circles is an eyesore as is, it’s time to give us a way to use our Google contacts more efficiently.

Social search

Thought Google already implemented social search? Think again. It looks like Google+ will take this a step further, and it’s speculated that it means you can use Google+ to search through your various social networking profiles all via Google. If this is so, it sounds like you could use Google+ to search for something you know a friend posted to Twitter and pull it up.

Our vote: Social search already seems to be adequately pulling in our contacts’ Tweets, but it’s not something that would hurt Google+.

Molly McHugh
Former Social Media/Web Editor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
X’s creator payouts are changing, and original content is the new currency
The platform is replacing Revenue Sharing with a program designed to reward creators who actually make something.
X Twitter on iPhone

X is changing the rules for creators yet again. This time, the platform wants to put less emphasis on simply generating engagement and more on actually making something original. X is replacing its controversial Creator Revenue Sharing program with a new initiative called Original Content Rewards, which will officially launch on September 8, 2026. The existing Revenue Sharing program will continue paying participating creators through September 7, after which the new system takes over.

X wants to reward creators, not engagement farmers

Read more
Snapchat’s Spotlight algorithm now favors human-made videos over AI-generated ones
Snapchat is taking a firm stance against AI slop.
Snapchat-App-Store-open-on-iPhone

If you've been uploading fully AI-generated videos on Snapchat in hopes of earning rewards, it might be time to rethink your strategy. Snapchat has announced changes to Spotlight that prioritize authentic, original creativity over content created entirely by artificial intelligence. The company says its recommendation system will now favor videos made by real creators, while fully AI-generated submissions will no longer qualify for monetization.

So what's changing on Spotlight?

Read more
LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop
The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated.
LinkedIn seems like AI slop button

LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears.

The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own.

Read more