Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Under 13? You may soon find your Facebook or Instagram account suspended

Add as a preferred source on Google
Panithan Fakseemuang / 123RF

Instagram and its parent company Facebook are beginning to crack down on underage users. As per a new “operational” change to the social media empire’s policies, both Facebook and Instagram will be more proactive in locking the accounts of users who are suspected of being under the minimum age of 13. Previously, Facebook would only look into accounts that were specifically reported to be run by younger individuals. But now, the social network will begin locking accounts of any and all underage users that moderators find, regardless of why they were initially reported.

Accounts believed to be operated by individuals younger than 13 will be required to provide proof of age, likely by way of a government-issued ID, in order to re-establish control of the account. While the company does not require its users to provide any such identification upon signing up, it’s clear that the honor system in that regard isn’t working out so well.

Recommended Videos

While Facebook has gradually begun to cater more toward older demographics, this is certainly not the case for Instagram. Anecdotally speaking, at the very least, it seems that today’s youth are eager to begin their social media lives on Instagram, and it’s likely that these younger users make up a significant proportion of the app’s user base. Cracking down on these accounts, then, could have an effect both on user numbers as well as ad revenue.

The change was precipitated by a documentary put forth by the U.K.’s Channel 4 and Firecrest Films, in which an undercover journalist became a Facebook content reviewer via a third-party firm in Dublin, Ireland. One of the reviewers purported that their instructions were to ignore users who seemed to be underage, noting, “We have to have an admission that the person is underage. If not, we just like pretend that we are blind and that we don’t know what underage looks like.” The documentary also suggested that right-wing political pages were held to different standards when it came to deletion or suspension.

Facebook responded to these allegations, recently publishing a blog post that said that high-profile Pages and registered political groups are often subjected to another layer of review from actual Facebook employees. However, in the days since, Facebook has added, “Since the program, we have been working to update the guidance for reviewers to put a hold on any account they encounter if they have a strong indication it is underage, even if the report was for something else.”

While this doesn’t mean that all underage accounts will suddenly be shut down, it does mean that if a reviewer sees something, he or she is now far more likely to say something. The 13-year-old minimum is mandated by the U.S. Child Online Privacy Protection Act, which necessitates that digital companies obtain parental consent before collecting data about children.

So why now? The likely answer is that Facebook is now facing more scrutiny than ever in the wake of its high-profile Cambridge Analytica scandal (and now Crimson Hexagon), as well as a number of other controversies including Russian interference in the 2016 election, addiction to the social network, and failure to protect users from fake news and other problematic content. Consequently, Facebook has outlined a new moderation policy, telling TechCrunch, “There are certain forms of misinformation that have contributed to physical harm, and we are making a policy change which will enable us to take that type of content down. We will be begin implementing the policy during the coming months.”

Of course, Facebook will have its work cut out toeing the line between granting free speech and creating a safe and inclusive online environment. We’ll be sure to keep you abreast of its progress.

Lulu Chang
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
WhatsApp finally fixes one of its biggest storage headaches with this new cleanup tool
whatsapp-disappearing-messages-after-reading-timer

If your phone's storage keeps mysteriously shrinking, WhatsApp channels might be part of the reason. Photos, videos, voice notes, and other media shared by channels can pile up in the background, and until now, cleaning them out hasn't exactly been a pleasant experience. That's finally changing.

WhatsApp is rolling out a new storage cleanup tool for channel media, giving Android beta users a much simpler way to free up space without digging through endless files one by one. The feature was first spotted in development a couple of months ago, and it's now beginning to reach select beta testers through the latest WhatsApp beta for Android update.

Read more
Meta used AI to make your Instagram feed harder to quit
Meta says its latest AI recommendation sytems are keeping people on Instagram longer by serving up more relevant Reels and Feed posts.
Instagram open on iPhone

Caught yourself scrolling on Instagram a lot longer lately? You're not imagining it. Meta just told investors what's driving that trend, and AI is at the center of it.

During its second-quarter earnings call, Meta said time spent on Instagram grew by double digits year over year after rolling out new AI-powered recommendation systems. According to the company, the biggest gains came from improvements to how it recommends Reels and other public content, making it easier to surface videos people are more likely to watch.

Read more
Meta’s latest courtroom losses expose a potential hole in social media’s strongest defense
Plaintiffs are treating engagement features as deliberately designed products, an argument that could make Section 230 far less useful
facebook

Two jury losses have given plaintiffs momentum against Meta, but they haven’t rewritten the rules for social media. One case relied on New Mexico consumer-protection laws. The other asked a California jury whether addictive design contributed to a young woman’s mental-health issues.

The verdicts, detailed by The Wall Street Journal, reached Meta through different legal routes. Together, they suggest Section 230 becomes a less dependable shield when a lawsuit centers on choices made by the platform itself.

Read more