Skip to main content

Facebook manipulated more than 600,000 users’ News Feeds to study people’s emotions

It’s possible that you were just involved in a massive psychological experiment — but don’t worry, nobody else knew about it either.

According to a study recently published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), data scientists for Facebook tweaked the News Feed algorithms for 689,003 users, manipulating the types of posts they saw on a daily basis.  For one week in 2012, the algorithm filtered a disproportionately low number of either positive or negative posts on the users’ feeds.

The point was to see if emotions could be transferred virtually, just as they are transferred in face-to-face interactions. And sure enough, the scientists found that people who saw fewer positive posts on their News Feeds created fewer positive posts themselves.  Conversely, the fewer negative posts people saw, the more positive they became online.

“Emotional states can be transferred to others via emotional contagion, leading people to experience the same emotions without their awareness,” wrote study authors Adam Kramer, Jamie Guillory, and Jeffrey Hancock. “We provide experimental evidence that emotional contagion occurs without direct interaction between people (exposure to a friend expressing an emotion is sufficient), and in the complete absence of nonverbal cues.”

But the creepy part of the whole thing? None of these Facebook users were aware their News Feeds were being manipulated.  It also means that an algorithm was perfectly capable of messing with people’s emotions for a whole week.

However, the study is covered under the Facebook Data Use Policy, which users must agree to before signing up for the site’s service.  The policy gives the company the right to access and use information people post to the social media site, and according to A.V. Club, the policy also lists a number of potential uses for this data, “including troubleshooting, data analysis, testing, research and service improvement.”

So if you felt depressed for one week back in 2012 without knowing why, that mystery may have just been solved.

[Image courtesy of Gil C/Shutterstock]

Editors' Recommendations

Loren Grush
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Loren Grush is a science and health writer living in New York City, having written for Fox News Health, Fox News SciTech and…
X CEO reveals video calls are coming to the app formerly known as Twitter
The new X sign replacing the Twitter logo on the company's headquarters in San Francisco.

X, formerly Twitter, is to get video calling as part of ongoing efforts to turn the platform into a so-called “everything app” offering a broad range of services.

X CEO Linda Yaccarino announced the news during an interview with CNBC on Thursday.

Read more
How to download Instagram photos (5 easy ways)
Instagram app running on the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5.

Instagram is amazing, and many of us use it as a record of our lives — uploading the best bits of our trips, adventures, and notable moments. But sometimes you can lose the original files of those moments, leaving the Instagram copy as the only available one . While you may be happy to leave it up there, it's a lot more convenient to have another version of it downloaded onto your phone or computer. While downloading directly from Instagram can be tricky, there are ways around it. Here are a few easy ways to download Instagram photos.

Read more
X seems to have deleted years of old Twitter images
The new X sign replacing the Twitter logo on the company's headquarters in San Francisco.

The social media platform formerly known as Twitter and recently rebranded as X appears to be having trouble showing images posted on the site between 2011 and 2014.

The issue came to widespread attention on Saturday when X user Tom Coates noted how the famous selfie posted by Ellen DeGeneres at the Oscars in 2014, which quickly broke the “most retweets” record, was no longer displaying. Later reports suggested the image had been restored, though, at the time of writing, we’re not seeing it.

Read more