Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Computing
  4. News

The latest major hurdle facing Elon Musk’s Twitter acquisition

Add as a preferred source on Google

Elon Musk’s Twitter acquisition seems to have taken another turn, and now it seems less likely than ever that the Tesla CEO will go through with his bid.

On Tuesday, Musk replied to a tweet shared by Twitter account @Teslarati. The tweet shared a link to a Teslarati article titled “Musk seeks Twitter deal discount, believes 20 percent of accounts are spam.”

Recommended Videos

Musk replied to this tweet with what appeared to be a clear ultimatum, saying that the deal wouldn’t happen unless he was shown proof of Twitter’s estimate of fake and spam accounts, which Twitter reported to the SEC as less than 5%.

20% fake/spam accounts, while 4 times what Twitter claims, could be *much* higher.

My offer was based on Twitter’s SEC filings being accurate.

Yesterday, Twitter’s CEO publicly refused to show proof of <5%.

This deal cannot move forward until he does.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 17, 2022

Musk’s apparent ultimatum comes the day after Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal issued a 15-tweet thread statement of his own in which he addressed the recent concerns about Twitter’s reported spam account percentage estimate. Agrawal’s tweets essentially defended Twitter’s reported estimate of less than 5%, explained how Twitter’s estimate was calculated, and also asserted that external estimates by third parties weren’t possible due to the fact that Twitter “uses both public and private data” to make these estimates, the latter of which is not shared by Twitter.

Agrawal also went on to say that its percentage estimate is based on accounts they count as mDAUs (monetizable daily active users) and that for third parties wanting to calculate external estimates, “it’s not even possible” for them “to know which accounts are counted as mDAUs on any given day.

Unfortunately, we don’t believe that this specific estimation can be performed externally, given the critical need to use both public and private information (which we can’t share). Externally, it’s not even possible to know which accounts are counted as mDAUs on any given day.

— Parag Agrawal (@paraga) May 16, 2022

Musk did reply to Agrawal’s tweets with two tweets of his own: the first which featured a single poop emoji and the second which asked a question about advertisers.

Musk’s Tuesday morning tweet seems to demand that Agrawal show “proof” of Twitter’s fake and spam account percentage estimate in order for Musk’s acquisition of the bird app to “move forward.” But it is unclear at this time, what sort of proof Musk is looking for. In fact, Agrawal’s tweet thread said that Twitter already “shared an overview of the estimation process with Elon a week ago.”

There are LOTS of details that are very important underneath this high-level description. We shared an overview of the estimation process with Elon a week ago and look forward to continuing the conversation with him, and all of you.

— Parag Agrawal (@paraga) May 16, 2022

And so the question is, what was in that overview and why wasn’t that enough to calm concerns about the percentage of spam and fake accounts on Twitter?

Anita George
Anita George has been writing for Digital Trends' Computing section since 2018. So for almost six years, Anita has written…
Instagram scammers are holding creators’ accounts hostage with copyright strikes
Meta’s copyright system is being weaponized against the creators it’s supposed to protect
A person holding a phone with the Instagram app open on it.

Imagine waking up to find your Instagram account suspended because someone claims you stole their content. You might know that the claim is false, but appealing it could take weeks. If you're a content creator, each day offline could cost you money. Meanwhile, the person behind the complaint offers to make the problem disappear for just a few hundred dollars.

According to a new BBC investigation, Instagram creators are being hit with this new online racket. Scammers are filing bogus copyright complaints and demanding payment to withdraw them, exploiting the fact that repeated claims can put an account at risk of suspension. The account owner may still have their password and login credentials, but that does little good when their content or account has been taken offline.

Read more
Social media users in Australia might get freedom from algorithms. I want it for us all.
Big Tech may soon have to give Australians more say over what lands in their feeds.
iPhone showing social media apps

Australians might soon get to hit the off switch on the algorithm running their social media feed. According to a BBC report, draft legislation set to land this week would force platforms to hand users that choice, and honestly, I believe every country deserves this option.

Why is the government pushing this now?

Read more
Instagram will limit reach for AI influencers who skip AI-generated label on their profile
Instagram tightens AI influencer disclosure rules with a clearer profile label
instagram-ai-generated-profiles

Instagram just drew a hard line around AI influencers pretending to be real people. The platform is renaming its old AI creator label to AI-generated profile, and this time it comes with penalties too. Accounts featuring a fully AI-generated person will see their reach cut if they skip the label, meaning your feed is about to get a lot more honest about who is actually behind the account.

So what counts as an AI-generated profile?

Read more