Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Business
  4. Web
  5. News

Ahead of potential federal law, Seattle is asking Facebook for election data

Add as a preferred source on Google

Federal law doesn’t yet require social media companies to disclose data on political ads, but Seattle is now asking Facebook and Google to send additional data on ad spending from the city’s last election. According to Reuters, the city is asking the tech companies to provide the data in accordance with a 1977 law that was previously unenforced for online ads.

The law requires that companies selling ads for the city’s elections to keep public records that show who purchased the ads, the payments and the details and extent of that ad. After social media giants were criticized following an investigation revealing Russian-paid ads during the 2016 presidential election, a Seattle-based publication pointed out the local law. The city then sent requests to both Facebook and Google for the information.

Recommended Videos

Facebook has already met with city staff and provided some data, but the Seattle Ethics and Elections Commission Executive Director Wayne Barnett said that the company shared partial spending data and did not include the copies of the ads. Barnett said the group is meeting with the city’s attorney later this week to discuss additional action.

Facebook’s vice president of U.S. State and Local Policy Will Castleberry said that the company responded with relevant information and that the company supports transparency for political ads.

Google asked for additional time to gather the data, a request that is still pending approval, Reuters says.

The law details penalties of up to $5,000 for each ad.

Federal law requires radio, print and TV ads to disclose who paid for political ads, but that legislation hasn’t yet caught up with online ads. The Honest Ads Act could bring online ads under the same rules if the legislation passes. In response to the act, Facebook (along with Twitter) shared changes for more transparency in political ads, including labeling the ad with information on who paid for the ad. Facebook is first testing those features in Canada before rolling out ahead of midterm elections in the U.S. later this year. While the plan also includes a database of political ads, the new ad history feature won’t include data from before the changes were put in place, which excludes the last Seattle city election.

Hillary K. Grigonis
Hillary never planned on becoming a photographer—and then she was handed a camera at her first writing job and she's been…
X’s creator payouts are changing, and original content is the new currency
The platform is replacing Revenue Sharing with a program designed to reward creators who actually make something.
X Twitter on iPhone

X is changing the rules for creators yet again. This time, the platform wants to put less emphasis on simply generating engagement and more on actually making something original. X is replacing its controversial Creator Revenue Sharing program with a new initiative called Original Content Rewards, which will officially launch on September 8, 2026. The existing Revenue Sharing program will continue paying participating creators through September 7, after which the new system takes over.

X wants to reward creators, not engagement farmers

Read more
Snapchat’s Spotlight algorithm now favors human-made videos over AI-generated ones
Snapchat is taking a firm stance against AI slop.
Snapchat-App-Store-open-on-iPhone

If you've been uploading fully AI-generated videos on Snapchat in hopes of earning rewards, it might be time to rethink your strategy. Snapchat has announced changes to Spotlight that prioritize authentic, original creativity over content created entirely by artificial intelligence. The company says its recommendation system will now favor videos made by real creators, while fully AI-generated submissions will no longer qualify for monetization.

So what's changing on Spotlight?

Read more
LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop
The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated.
LinkedIn seems like AI slop button

LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears.

The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own.

Read more