Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Legacy Archives

Snapchat reportedly asking brands $750,000 for ads (which disappear)

Add as a preferred source on Google

Snapchat users have been seeing ads in the Recent Updates section of the app since last October as the startup behind the messaging software seeks to build out its platform and pull in some revenue.

Just like the hundreds of millions of messages sent via the app every day, the ads don’t stick around forever, vanishing immediately after being viewed, or after a maximum of 24 hours.

Recommended Videos

But here’s an interesting tidbit – the startup is asking brands to cough up a whopping $750,000 a day to get their wares showing up on the service, Adweek reported on Wednesday.

In a bid to convince advertisers that it’d be money well spent, Snapchat is touting its service as “a TV-style commercial space with millions of viewers a day,” according to Adweek’s unnamed source.

An ad agency executive speaking on condition of anonymity said Snapchat “has minimums, and they are very firm on them,” suggesting the startup is confident there are plenty of brands out there willing to hand over such a huge amount of cash.

And it may be right. Up to now, McDonald’s, Samsung, Universal, Macy’s, and Electronic Arts have all posted ads on the service, though there’s really no way of telling if they actually paid top dollar (early bird discount, perhaps?). In addition, it’s not certain the brands would be willing to go on paying such a hefty sum over an extended period.

Snapchat hasn’t offered any recent information regarding how many people are using its app; the last we heard was that it had 100 million monthly users in August 2014, so perhaps we’ll be getting an announcement on the 200 million mark sometime soon.

Either way, there’s little doubt a ton of brands would love to reach the predominantly teenage user base, though the suggestion that the platform is currently unable to give marketers detailed information on how the ads are being viewed – as well as the fact that they disappear after only one watch – may be causing a number of brands to think twice before blowing $750,000 of their marketing budget on a day’s worth of Snapchat advertising.

One top brand executive told Adweek that Snapchat’s rates are “significantly higher than what’s competitive out there,” adding, “It’s difficult to go forward with a deal with Snapchat at the prices they’re quoting.”

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Meta just pulled its most controversial AI image generation feature days after launch
Meta is framing this as "hearing feedback," not as fixing a consent problem.
Instagram Muse Image

A couple of days ago, I covered Meta’s announcement of the Muse Image, an AI tool that lets users generate images based on someone’s Instagram profile without asking the account owner. 

I also highlighted the risks associated with it in another piece, along with steps for opting out. Three days later, the feature is no longer available. 

Read more
Your YouTube playlists can now become actual TV shows, but there’s a catch you need to know
YouTube just gave Partner Program creators the episodic infrastructure that Netflix has been using to keep audiences hooked for years.
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

YouTube just gave its creators a tool that streaming platforms take for granted. I’m talking about the ability to structure content as proper episodic TV. 

If you're in the YouTube Partner Program and you’ve been organizing your videos into playlists while praying that the algorithm and your audience notice, then Shows is the upgrade you've been waiting for.

Read more
I knew there was plenty of AI slop on LinkedIn. Shocking report says the problem is far worse than suspected
LinkedIn app on App Store iPhone

I already knew LinkedIn was overflowing with posts written by AI, recycled leadership advice, and those god-awful lessons about entrepreneurship. A new report suggests the situation is considerably worse than even the platform’s feed makes it appear.

AI-detection company Pangram analyzed more than one million posts scanned through its Chrome extension across LinkedIn, X, Reddit, Medium, and Substack. LinkedIn represented approximately one-third of everything scanned, yet produced 62% of all content Pangram flagged as AI-generated.

Read more