Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Web
  4. Legacy Archives

Twitter may be banning links in Direct Messages to help fight spammers

Add as a preferred source on Google

Twitter users reported problems sending links in direct messages last night, prompting Twitter to issue a notice in its Help Center: “We’re restructuring back-end elements of our direct message system. As a result, users may be unable to send some URLs in direct messages. We apologize for the inconvenience.” 

But is this a temporary inconvenience, or a sign that Twitter is fighting a spam problem in its direct messages? Last night, ReadWrite hypothesized that this service interruption could be an attempt on Twitter’s part to thwart spammers, who often send malicious links using the DM service. 

Screen Shot 2013-10-18 at 12.30.42 PM
Image used with permission by copyright holder

As of today, when I attempted to send a URL link through direct message, I received an error notice. The same thing happened when I used Bitly to shorten the link.

Recommended Videos

Links go through without a problem for www.twitter.com, www.instagram.com, www.google.com, and www.facebook.com, so it appears Twitter has unblocked links from specific websites. This is consistent with the idea that the link ban is a bandaid fix to combat a problem with malicious links, since the service is still allowing links to websites it knows to be safe (or, in the case of its own site, has a vested interest in spreading, although I honestly have no idea why anyone would send another Twitter user a link to the Twitter URL). 

While I got a simple error message, other users are reporting messages that indicate their link is malware: 

Twitter is rolling out changes to direct messages that will allow users to opt-in to receive DMs from any user, a change from its previous policy of only allowing DMs from users you follow. The change may be part of an effort to make the platform more appealing to marketers and advertising partners, since users who opt-in to receive messages from anyone could end up getting promotional materials in their inbox as part of campaigns. 

Whether this is just a temporary service thing, like Twitter says, or the beginning of a more permanent overhaul for direct messages, it is not a victimless crime. The NCIS fan community took the change to heart: 

Kate Knibbs
Former Contributor
Kate Knibbs is a writer from Chicago. She is very happy that her borderline-unhealthy Internet habits are rewarded with a…
X’s creator payouts are changing, and original content is the new currency
The platform is replacing Revenue Sharing with a program designed to reward creators who actually make something.
X Twitter on iPhone

X is changing the rules for creators yet again. This time, the platform wants to put less emphasis on simply generating engagement and more on actually making something original. X is replacing its controversial Creator Revenue Sharing program with a new initiative called Original Content Rewards, which will officially launch on September 8, 2026. The existing Revenue Sharing program will continue paying participating creators through September 7, after which the new system takes over.

X wants to reward creators, not engagement farmers

Read more
Snapchat’s Spotlight algorithm now favors human-made videos over AI-generated ones
Snapchat is taking a firm stance against AI slop.
Snapchat-App-Store-open-on-iPhone

If you've been uploading fully AI-generated videos on Snapchat in hopes of earning rewards, it might be time to rethink your strategy. Snapchat has announced changes to Spotlight that prioritize authentic, original creativity over content created entirely by artificial intelligence. The company says its recommendation system will now favor videos made by real creators, while fully AI-generated submissions will no longer qualify for monetization.

So what's changing on Spotlight?

Read more
LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop
The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated.
LinkedIn seems like AI slop button

LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears.

The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own.

Read more