Skip to main content

Twitter ups user privacy controls, makes using third-party apps more difficult

twitter-oauth_desktopIn an attempt to give users greater control over their accounts, Twitter announced this week tighter controls on third-party app developers. The new regulations restrict third-party apps from access users’ direct messages without expressed consent.

“Beginning today, we’re giving you more control over what information you share with third-party applications,” writes Twitter in a statement on the company blog. “Apps that you use to access your direct messages will ask for your permission again. By the middle of June, applications that do not need access to your direct messages will no longer have it, and you can continue to use these apps as usual.”

When attempting to grant a new application access to your Twitter account, a new permission screen will pop up, which will give more details about what account information the app is trying to access. The data will include whether or not it’s reading your tweets, recording your follow list, your profile, automatically posting tweets to your account, or accessing your direct messages. “If you’re not comfortable with the level of access an application requests,” says Twitter, “simply say ‘No, thanks’.”

While this is certainly good for user privacy, it has a significant downside. Namely, users will now have to go to Twitter.com when setting up accounts with any app, including native apps like TweetDeck, Twitterrific, Tweetbot, etc.

As Daring Fireball‘s John Gruber points out, this is “a huge pain in the ass,” especially when setting up an app with multiple accounts. And having multiple accounts is one of the primary reasons to use a native Twitter app. Not only that, but these are the apps for which it makes the most sense to allow direct message access, since they are being used to send and receive direct messages.

It’s understandable that Twitter would want to reign in the proliferating number of third-party apps as a security precaution. But the company need to be careful not to inhibit how users access and use the microblogging service, or it will start to push people away. Considering Twitter just passed the 300 million user mark, however, that doesn’t seem much of an issue.

Editors' Recommendations

Andrew Couts
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
Bluesky barrels toward 1 million new sign-ups in a day
Bluesky social media app logo.

Social media app Bluesky has picked nearly a million new users just a day after exiting its invitation-only beta and opening to everyone.

In a post on its main rival -- X (formerly Twitter) -- Bluesky shared a chart showing a sudden boost in usage on the app, which can now be downloaded for free for iPhone and Android devices.

Read more
How to make a GIF from a YouTube video
woman sitting and using laptop

Sometimes, whether you're chatting with friends or posting on social media, words just aren't enough -- you need a GIF to fully convey your feelings. If there's a moment from a YouTube video that you want to snip into a GIF, the good news is that you don't need complex software to so it. There are now a bunch of ways to make a GIF from a YouTube video right in your browser.

If you want to use desktop software like Photoshop to make a GIF, then you'll need to download the YouTube video first before you can start making a GIF. However, if you don't want to go through that bother then there are several ways you can make a GIF right in your browser, without the need to download anything. That's ideal if you're working with a low-specced laptop or on a phone, as all the processing to make the GIF is done in the cloud rather than on your machine. With these options you can make quick and fun GIFs from YouTube videos in just a few minutes.
Use GIFs.com for great customization
Step 1: Find the YouTube video that you want to turn into a GIF (perhaps a NASA archive?) and copy its URL.

Read more
I paid Meta to ‘verify’ me — here’s what actually happened
An Instagram profile on an iPhone.

In the fall of 2023 I decided to do a little experiment in the height of the “blue check” hysteria. Twitter had shifted from verifying accounts based (more or less) on merit or importance and instead would let users pay for a blue checkmark. That obviously went (and still goes) badly. Meanwhile, Meta opened its own verification service earlier in the year, called Meta Verified.

Mostly aimed at “creators,” Meta Verified costs $15 a month and helps you “establish your account authenticity and help[s] your community know it’s the real us with a verified badge." It also gives you “proactive account protection” to help fight impersonation by (in part) requiring you to use two-factor authentication. You’ll also get direct account support “from a real person,” and exclusive features like stickers and stars.

Read more