Skip to main content

FTC head wants the Internet of Things to regulate itself

ftc iot self regulae ftchead
The acting head of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Maureen Ohlhausen, has said that she believes the Internet of Things industry should largely be left to regulate itself, rather than being subjected to external oversight. She also defended the use of data analytics to target consumers with different offers and pricing.

As much as the tech industry likes to try and create new standards, it has often taken external pressure and legislation for that to take shape — such as in the case of MicroUSB phone chargers. In the wake of hacks and security concerns with a number of IoT devices, many tech analysts and companies have called for a standardization of certain features, but that’s not something Ohlhausen wants to take a part in. At least not yet.

For Ohlhausen, there isn’t enough evidence to suggest that the IoT market needs that sort of governmental regulation. Instead, she’d rather wait and see how it evolves naturally.

“We’re saying not ‘Let’s speculate about harm five years out,’ but ‘Is there something happening that harms consumers right now or is likely to cause harm to consumers,’” she said during a conference of digital security specialists earlier this week (via The Guardian).

She went on to argue that a harm to consumers had yet to be demonstrated by a lack of standardization in the IoT industry. Some analysts argue that it has, highlighting the DDOS attack against internet management firm Dyn in late 2016, which leveraged millions of IoT-connected devices, such as smart cameras, to bombard its DNS servers with traffic.

The attack caused the very foundations of many of the most popular internet services to shake and in some cases cease working. It’s that danger from poorly secured IoT devices that analysts believe means the industry needs regulation and standards.

Ohlhausen separately defended the practice of using big data to direct those deemed to have more expendable income to worse deals online. Using consumer data such as the type of hardware they are browsing on to recommend pricier deals was something that encouraged competition, she argued, highlighting that it could also mean those with less money may get better deals because of it.

Editors' Recommendations

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is the Evergreen Coordinator for Computing, overseeing a team of writers addressing all the latest how to…
New ‘BrickerBot’ malware attack kills unsecured Internet of Things devices
microsoft security intelligence report 2016 online piracy

The Internet of Things (IoT) is at the heart of many modern technology devices, not the least of which are the increasingly popular smart home components that unlock our doors and control our heating and lighting. The security of IoT devices is, therefore, paramount if these increasingly ubiquitous devices are going to bring more benefit than cost.

Unfortunately, IoT has been the source of significant malware attacks in recent months, including the distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack that took down a large swatch of the internet in October 2016. Now, a new piece of malware, dubbed BrickerBot, is in the wild and targeting IoT device running the open-source Linux operating system, as Readwrite reports.

Read more
Responding to market pressure, insurance companies jump on the smart-home train
smart home insurance market advance family talking with agent

How much loyalty do you have to your home insurance company? Many of the same people interested in smart-home tech aren't very loyal to their carriers, and as a result, home insurance companies are trying to deal with at-home IoT tech in consumer policies, reports Insurance Business.

Despite a lack of evidence that smart-home monitoring and alert devices actually result in differences that could reduce claims, insurers are responding to market pressure for lower premiums. As homeowners rush to buy Amazon Echo and Google Home devices, considered by carriers to be smart-home "gateway drugs," insurers see a potential market disruption, based on a study by NTT Data. The report surveyed home insurance carriers and found that 77 percent of those surveyed said they were "ramping up IoT initiatives" and 59 percent stated they were making "strong progress" in adding smart-home tech to coverage.

Read more
What if all the ‘things’ in the Internet of Things spoke the same language?
An Internet of Things simulation.

Imagine if you had to choose banks, grocery stores, and doctors in your city based on the languages they recognized. That restriction would be more than irksome. You might miss out on wonderful new stores or be unable to use a medical specialist who was the only one in town who could help with a specific problem. Avoiding a similar troublesome limitation is the force behind a big push for a standard connectivity language for the Internet of Things.

The Open Connectivity Foundation (OCF), a new organization formed last year with some, but not all, of the biggest IoT players, is making progress with a standard communications platform, Fast Company reported. With all the connectivity and control devices, hubs, platforms, and interfaces for smart homes alone, never mind industrial, transportation, shipping, and other IoT applications, the need for more open connectivity is increasingly apparent. If you are attracted by the feature set in a specific outdoor security camera, why should you have to make sure it can "talk" to your home thermostat and your new car's geo-fencing alert system?

Read more