Skip to main content

Google and Facebook crack down on scammers using ads on fake news sites

Fake news sites are turning out to be a real headache not only for Facebook, but all sites that show, share, or aggregate content from publications around the world.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg was even accused in recent days of allowing fake news stories on his site to influence the presidential election, though the Zuck dismissed the notion as “crazy.”

Fake news comes in several forms. It could consist of content from a news outlet that inadvertently put together an article using information hastily gathered from a site like Twitter during a breaking news event. Such errors, although thankfully rare, are usually followed by the content’s swift removal once the mistake has been spotted.

Or, as happened during the recent presidential election campaign, fake news might be created by political activists putting out bogus content in a bid to boost their candidate’s position or damage that of their opponent.

Finally, it could simply be the work of scammers deliberately posting phony news articles on a standalone site that’s full of revenue-generating ads, its creators banking on the story blowing up on social media so that more people visit their site.

Aware that Google AdSense ads are often used on scammers’ sites, the web giant said Monday it’s working on a policy update to restrict its ads from appearing on such webpages, according to Reuters.

In a statement, Google promised to “restrict ad serving on pages that misrepresent, misstate, or conceal information about the publisher, the publisher’s content, or the primary purpose of the web property.” Google already bans its ads from appearing on sites with pornographic or violent content.

Facebook swiftly followed in Google’s footsteps, announcing that it too is banning operators of fake news sites from utilizing its ad network to generate income.

“While implied, we have updated the policy to explicitly clarify that this applies to fake news,” a spokesman told the Wall Street Journal. “We vigorously enforce our policies and take swift action against sites and apps that are found to be in violation. Our team will continue to closely vet all prospective publishers and monitor existing ones to ensure compliance.”

The pressure has been growing in recent days for web services to work harder to eradicate phony news content from their sites, though it appears the challenge may be far bigger than many people expected.

Editors' Recommendations

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
How to watch the CEOs of Facebook, Google, Amazon, and Apple testify to Congress
big tech logos around capitol hill

Tech CEOs Testify Before The House Judiciary Committee | Digital Trends Live

The leaders of the four biggest and most powerful tech companies are scheduled to testify before the House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee in a hearing today, Wednesday, July 29. The entire hearing will be streamed live online.

Read more
Facebook ad boycotters to Congress: Don’t let Zuckerberg off easy
mark zuckerberg thinking

The organizers of the #StopHateforProfit Facebook ad boycott have written a letter to the House Judiciary Committee asking the members to particularly press Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg about the company’s alleged monopoly over the advertising sphere.
First reported by Axios, the letter suggests several pointed questions that lawmakers could ask: For instance, what percentage of U.S. digital ad spending runs through Facebook and its subsidiaries, what this means for small and medium businesses, and whether there are any alternatives for advertisers to reach certain demographics with the power and efficiency that Facebook uses. The questions seem intended to get at whether Facebook is truly the monopoly it claims not to be.
In June, several hundred major brands, including Coca-Cola, Unilever, and Starbucks, signed on with activist groups led by Common Sense Media, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and the Anti-Defamation League to remove their ads from Facebook for the month of July. This was an attempt, the groups said, the put pressure on Facebook to change its policies about hate speech and misinformation.

However, Facebook has proven resilient against so many big advertisers leaving its platform. Although MarketWatch reported that its stock tanked briefly in June when the boycott was announced, total ad revenue has remained basically steady throughout the boycott, according to Forbes. The social media giant is set to publish its second-quarter earnings report on Thursday, which should show whether the boycott had any kind of major effect on Facebook's bottom line.

Read more
Google to ban ads from appearing next to coronavirus conspiracy theories
medical employee holding mask stylized image

Google will reportedly ban advertisements from running alongside debunked coronavirus conspiracy theories, starting in August.

Under the new policy, supervisors will be able to remove entire ads from articles, as well as ban all advertisements for websites that violate the new rule on multiple occasions, according to CNBC. Google had previously banned ads that made harmful claims about prevention and treatment of the coronavirus.

Read more