Skip to main content

Jabra BT800 Review

Jabra BT800
“Sound quality was excellent. Both inbound and outbound sound quality was better by far than using the handset.”
Pros
  • Multifunction LCD; integrated hands-free features; light weight
Cons
  • Low volume; limited adjustability; confusing button functions

The Jabra BT800 is the flagship Bluetooth headset from one of the leaders in cell phone accessories.  What makes the BT800 unique is the unprecedented level of control the wearer has over information access.  An integrated LCD displays incoming caller ID information and allows for redialing directly from the headset.  The unit also sports background noise removal and vibration alerts, making it one of the most feature-packed headsets on the market.

Design and Features

Most cell phone Bluetooth headsets are almost identical.  Add a boom here, twist a plastic edge there, and voila–a new product!  What separates the Jabra BT800 from the competition is the huge list of features not found in any other headset.  The BT800 integrates many hands-free features found in car units into a lightweight headset.

The package contains the headset, case, reset/pairing stick, and charging cord.  Instead of an AC cord, Jabra opted to use a micro USB cord.  We would have liked to see an optional USB-to-AC or -DC power cord included as well.  The reset/pairing stick is the size of a paper clip and fits into a recessed hole on the edge of the unit.

From the outside, the BT800 looks unremarkable.  The body is slightly wider than the average headset, with the only attention-getting feature being the glowing blue activity/mute button.  On the surface and facing the wearer’s cheek is a small, two-line LCD.  The ear wraparound piece that secures the unit rotates and twists in almost every direction, which would sound like a flexible and comfortable headset.  Unfortunately, Jabra left out one important adjustment parameter:  It’s impossible to explain in words, but suffice it to say, there is a dimension of adjustability that isn’t accounted for.  The lack of this one dimension of movement makes the BT800 impossible to fit properly for average ears without extensive fiddling.  The addition of a ¼” telescoping piece would have alleviated this problem.

Button placement and usage is confusing and poorly thought out.  The interface designers were obviously trying to consolidate a large number of functions into as few buttons as possible, but in doing so created a steep learning curve for a device that should be very simple to operate.  There are a total of three buttons to access ten functions, as well as an up/down/scroll toggle.  Two buttons are set along the bottom edge of the unit, with the directional toggle surrounding the blue, illuminated mute button.  The two bottom surface buttons have three modes:  tap, press, and hold.  The mode is determined by the length of the press.  Tap = an instant, press = 1 second, and hold = 5 seconds.  To make matters worse, feedback beeps are delayed by close to a second.  To add to the confusion, the user must pair the device with the paper clip hole button, rather than a menu option.

Jabra BT800
Image Courtesy of Jabra

Testing and Use

Once you get past the interface snafus, the feature set is amazing for a headset.  The LCD shows inbound caller ID and menu options.  Basic navigation of the menu is easy, since there are only two options:  call list and settings.  Inbound calls are stored for quick retrieval.  The BT800 can be set to use one of five ringtones, to pass through your current ringtone, and to use vibration alert.  The caller’s name will also appear on the BT800 if there is a contact record for them on the phone.  Pairing, while awkward, was flawless with our SonyEricsson P910a.  We found most functions to operate as advertised, except one:  pressing the answer button should allow the wearer to use voice commands.  As many times as we tried, and for any length of press, we were never able to get this function to work.  This is unfortunate because it means the hands-free abilities are a mute point, since the phone still has to be used directly.  In other words, users can’t rely on the BT800 to replace all interaction with their phone.  If this functioned as intended, it would mean that owners could stow their phone in a backpack or purse and not worry about using it on the road.

Sound quality was excellent.  Both inbound and outbound sound quality was better by far than using the handset.  The noise cancellation technology eliminated nearly all background noise, but also eliminated some noise on the incoming end.  White noise and background music was almost imperceptible on the receiver’s end.  Wind noise could not be heard, but resulted in frequent elimination of all sound, both incoming and outgoing.  Instead of annoying static sounds of a wind gust, the headset goes silent.  Volume levels could be better on the earpiece.  Since we had a hard time fitting the BT800 correctly, the speaker was always a little far from our ears, making sounds softer.  Microphone volume was excellent, and he had no complaints from people on the other end of a call.

There is no ability to update the headset’s firmware or ROM, which means that these shortcomings are likely to exist until units ship with these bugs worked out.

Conclusion

The Jabra BT800 could have been the uber headset to which all others would bow, but the implementation is marred by a steep learning curve and missing functionality.  However, taking the time to learn the interface is rewarded with a depth of functionality not yet paralleled by anything on the market today.  Sound quality is very good, but could use a volume boost, and the flexibility of the fitting system lacks every dimension.  From the outside, the BT800 looks like a killer piece of gear.  But buyer beware:  not all is as it appears in the Kingdom of Jabra.

Pros:

  • Multifunction LCD 
  • Integrated hands-free features
  • Light weight

Cons:

  • Low volume
  • Limited adjustability
  • Confusing button functions

Editors' Recommendations

Aaron Colter
Former Digital Trends Contributor
All the new tech that blew our reviewers away this month
A glowing blue and purple on the LG C2 OLED.

We're nearing developer conference season, but before we get there, we've been busy reviewing our little hearts out this past month.

We've found the gems among the many tech products we've given a try this month. They span all the most important established product categories, but also include those tech products that are more off the beaten path. Everything below is stuff we've personally used and reviewed ourselves -- and these ones certainly got our attention this month.

Read more
Motorola G Stylus 5G hands-on review: Notetaking nirvana on a budget
The Motorola G Stylus 5G with a stylus and plants.

My first thought upon seeing the Moto G Stylus 5G was how much it reminded me of the Motorola Edge+, which I recently reviewed. Fresh out of the box, the two are nearly identical in appearance. However, the G Stylus has some extra tricks up its sleeve, one of which is the fact that it has a built-in stylus that invites comparisons to Samsung’s S22 Ultra. The other is a very affordable price tag. The question is, can such a low-cost smartphone offer an experience that compares to such flagship devices?
Design and display: Looks great, feels cheap
As mentioned, the G Stylus looks an awful lot like the Edge+, and that’s a good thing. It’s a beautiful design that manages to negate some of the inconvenience of the camera bump. Unfortunately, the G Stylus doesn’t have that premium feel to it like the Edge+, and the backplate is a real fingerprint magnet. However, if you’re like me, a phone comes out of the box and goes immediately into a protective case, so lower quality backplate materials are a good place to reduce production costs.

The tall, 6.8-inch screen looks great, its FHD+ resolution is good enough, and colors/contrast are fine by my eye. Best of all is its 120Hz refresh rate, which allows for fluid navigation. Touchscreen functionality is responsive, and haptic feedback is similarly decent. Bezels are fairly large and noticeable, but not offensively so.

Read more
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G hands-on review: Your long-term partner
Rear view of the blue Samsung Galaxy A53 5G.

Samsung has overhauled its great value midrange A-Series devices, launching the new Galaxy A33 5G and Galaxy A53 5G. At first glance, both look identical to each other, and arguably no different from the Galaxy A52 5G’s lovely design, but there’s a serious focus on longevity here with various changes to the spec that makes the new lower price even more tempting. I had the chance to try both phones out a few days before the launch.
Galaxy in your hand
The dimensions of the Galaxy A33 5G and Galaxy A53 5G are almost identical, and both are available in the same four colors, making the only immediately obvious way to tell the difference between them on their fronts. The Galaxy A33 5G has a teardrop selfie camera cutout, which Samsung calls Infinity-U, while the Galaxy A53 5G has a circular hole-punch selfie cam, called Infinity-O. There is a slight difference in weight, but as it’s only a few grams you won’t really notice.

The textured rear panel provides plenty of in-hand grip and has a pleasing warmth to it. The camera module blends into it for a smooth, classy finish. There are four colors, a pair of ordinary black or white models, along with a pretty sky blue and an unusual peach finish. I liked the sky blue a lot and was pleased the peach-ish version didn’t stray too far into the overdone pink territory. They give the design a fun, modern twist.

Read more