Skip to main content

Facebook's Trending feed publishes 9/11 conspiracy article

Facebook Tablet
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Facebook’s recently automated Trending feed is quickly becoming a laughingstock due to its failure to discern the real from the fake.

Following successive blunders last month, the algorithm tasked with compiling the platform’s most talked-about topics served users an unscrupulous tabloid article on Friday. The story in question claimed the September 11 attacks were caused by “bombs … planted in [the] Twin Towers.”

Facebook deleted the post after being notified about the error by Washington Post reporter Abby Ohlheiser. “We’re aware a hoax article showed up there,” a Facebook spokeswoman said in a statement on Friday, “and as a temporary step to resolving this we’ve removed the topic.”

Facebook removed human editors. (https://t.co/PdljXr2Cry) Now it is telling me 9/11 was caused by bombs, not planes. pic.twitter.com/X7Ug9khNVR

— Jessica Contrera (@mjcontrera) September 9, 2016

The article’s contents adhered to the tenets of the 9/11 Truth movement, whose supporters (known as “truthers”) reject the generally accepted account of the collapse of the World Trade Center. A quick look at the Trending sidebar in its present state shows the September 11 anniversary topic has now been paired with an altogether more appropriate preview article.

The slip-up arrives in the wake of Facebook’s introduction of a more autonomous Trending feed, supposedly free from the errors (and bias) of human judgment. Since then, the algorithm has made back-to-back blunders, first publishing a false article claiming Fox News had fired its anchor Megyn Kelly. Then, in a matter of hours, allowing a hashtag related to an obscene video to slip through its system.

Facebook claims human editors are still involved in the fine-tuning of its Trending feed, but on a reduced scale. However, it is still unclear what exactly its employees are responsible for. If they are in charge of vetting the feed, then that raises even more questions as to how these slip-ups keep occurring.

Editors' Recommendations

Saqib Shah
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Saqib Shah is a Twitter addict and film fan with an obsessive interest in pop culture trends. In his spare time he can be…
Bluesky barrels toward 1 million new sign-ups in a day
Bluesky social media app logo.

Social media app Bluesky has picked nearly a million new users just a day after exiting its invitation-only beta and opening to everyone.

In a post on its main rival -- X (formerly Twitter) -- Bluesky shared a chart showing a sudden boost in usage on the app, which can now be downloaded for free for iPhone and Android devices.

Read more
How to make a GIF from a YouTube video
woman sitting and using laptop

Sometimes, whether you're chatting with friends or posting on social media, words just aren't enough -- you need a GIF to fully convey your feelings. If there's a moment from a YouTube video that you want to snip into a GIF, the good news is that you don't need complex software to so it. There are now a bunch of ways to make a GIF from a YouTube video right in your browser.

If you want to use desktop software like Photoshop to make a GIF, then you'll need to download the YouTube video first before you can start making a GIF. However, if you don't want to go through that bother then there are several ways you can make a GIF right in your browser, without the need to download anything. That's ideal if you're working with a low-specced laptop or on a phone, as all the processing to make the GIF is done in the cloud rather than on your machine. With these options you can make quick and fun GIFs from YouTube videos in just a few minutes.
Use GIFs.com for great customization
Step 1: Find the YouTube video that you want to turn into a GIF (perhaps a NASA archive?) and copy its URL.

Read more
I paid Meta to ‘verify’ me — here’s what actually happened
An Instagram profile on an iPhone.

In the fall of 2023 I decided to do a little experiment in the height of the “blue check” hysteria. Twitter had shifted from verifying accounts based (more or less) on merit or importance and instead would let users pay for a blue checkmark. That obviously went (and still goes) badly. Meanwhile, Meta opened its own verification service earlier in the year, called Meta Verified.

Mostly aimed at “creators,” Meta Verified costs $15 a month and helps you “establish your account authenticity and help[s] your community know it’s the real us with a verified badge." It also gives you “proactive account protection” to help fight impersonation by (in part) requiring you to use two-factor authentication. You’ll also get direct account support “from a real person,” and exclusive features like stickers and stars.

Read more