Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Facebook reveals second Instant Articles metrics error in the span of a month

By

Facebook Instant Articles
Image used with permission by copyright holder
First Facebook spooked marketers with its ad metrics calculation errors, now it’s the publishers’ turn. The company said on Friday that it’s discovered a new issue that affected a “small group” of Instant Articles content providers between September 20 and November 30.

The update marks the fourth time Facebook has disclosed errors in regards to its analytics reporting since September. And, despite promising more third-party verification and transparency, the errors have persisted.

Recommended Videos

The latest miscalculation saw Facebook underreport iPhone traffic for Instant Articles from Facebook in comScore products for just over a month — although traffic from iPad and Android devices was not affected. The company claims it was notified of the error by comScore (which is one of its measurement partners), and that the miscalculation was caused by a recent update to its software used by select publishers.

Related

“We have fixed the issue and are working with comScore to produce updated estimates for the relevant time periods for the small group of partners affected. We have reached out to affected publishers,” writes the company in its announcement.

For those unfamiliar with Instant Articles, the publishing feature offers fast-loading mobile pages that preload within Facebook. The social network also allows content providers to sell ads within their stories.

This time last month, Facebook revealed its first Instant Articles blunder, when it reported it had been overestimating the amount of time people had been viewing articles by up to 7-8 percent since August 2015.

Although Facebook hasn’t commented on the extent of the error, The Wall Street Journal is citing an anonymous source that claims the undercounting of traffic could have been as high as 10-20 percent — and even 30 percent for one particular, unidentified site. The source claimed the discrepancy has affected some of the biggest publishers currently on Instant Articles, including The Washington Post, BuzzFeed, Foreign Policy, and Variety, among others.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Saqib Shah
Saqib Shah
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Saqib Shah is a Twitter addict and film fan with an obsessive interest in pop culture trends. In his spare time he can be…
Bluesky barrels toward 1 million new sign-ups in a day
Bluesky social media app logo.

Social media app Bluesky has picked nearly a million new users just a day after exiting its invitation-only beta and opening to everyone.

In a post on its main rival -- X (formerly Twitter) -- Bluesky shared a chart showing a sudden boost in usage on the app, which can now be downloaded for free for iPhone and Android devices.

Read more
How to make a GIF from a YouTube video
woman sitting and using laptop

Sometimes, whether you're chatting with friends or posting on social media, words just aren't enough -- you need a GIF to fully convey your feelings. If there's a moment from a YouTube video that you want to snip into a GIF, the good news is that you don't need complex software to so it. There are now a bunch of ways to make a GIF from a YouTube video right in your browser.

If you want to use desktop software like Photoshop to make a GIF, then you'll need to download the YouTube video first before you can start making a GIF. However, if you don't want to go through that bother then there are several ways you can make a GIF right in your browser, without the need to download anything. That's ideal if you're working with a low-specced laptop or on a phone, as all the processing to make the GIF is done in the cloud rather than on your machine. With these options you can make quick and fun GIFs from YouTube videos in just a few minutes.
Use GIFs.com for great customization
Step 1: Find the YouTube video that you want to turn into a GIF (perhaps a NASA archive?) and copy its URL.

Read more
I paid Meta to ‘verify’ me — here’s what actually happened
An Instagram profile on an iPhone.

In the fall of 2023 I decided to do a little experiment in the height of the “blue check” hysteria. Twitter had shifted from verifying accounts based (more or less) on merit or importance and instead would let users pay for a blue checkmark. That obviously went (and still goes) badly. Meanwhile, Meta opened its own verification service earlier in the year, called Meta Verified.

Mostly aimed at “creators,” Meta Verified costs $15 a month and helps you “establish your account authenticity and help[s] your community know it’s the real us with a verified badge." It also gives you “proactive account protection” to help fight impersonation by (in part) requiring you to use two-factor authentication. You’ll also get direct account support “from a real person,” and exclusive features like stickers and stars.

Read more