Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Web
  4. Legacy Archives

Facebook blocks Google+ extension that pulls contacts

Add as a preferred source on Google

facebook friend exporterIt was a matter of time before Facebook issued some kind of retort to Google+. While interested users continue to clamor everywhere (even on Facebook) for an invite and Mark Zuckerberg gives the new social network a go, that doesn’t mean everyone’s ready to play nice. A Chrome extension that allowed new Google+ users to import their Facebook contacts has been blocked by the world’s largest social network.

This is all too familiar. Last fall, Google and Facebook had something of a falling out over the ability to import contacts from their respective sites. Google tried to disable Facebook users’ ability to import Gmail contacts – a move that was swiftly circumvented by a workaround. Google, of course, took issue with this because Facebook didn’t give users the option of exporting any contact information from its site into Gmail. At the time, Facebook engineer Mike Vernal said it wasn’t just to be petty – Facebook had a reason. “Email is different from social networking because in an email application, each person maintains and owns their own address book, whereas in a social network your friends maintain their information and you just maintain a list of friends. Because of this, we think it makes sense for email applications to export email addresses and for social networks to export friend lists.”

Recommended Videos

But the lines between these two sites functions are becoming blurred, making it difficult to determine who should be able to import what and from where. Google’s main communications platform, Gmail, now stands in addition to Google+, a bon-afide social network. Facebook, on the other hand, has introduced its Messages client, which includes @facebook.com email addresses. But no matter the technicalities, Facebook is still not willing to enter a two-way, equal sharing relationship with Google. Google+ users remain unable to pull their Facebook friends into the new service, which can easily be attributed to protecting user information. Of course, it could have something to do with the heavy praise Google+ has been receiving.

Facebook is also infiltrating enemy territory by sending execs and engineers to the site to glean information for its own purposes. Many a Google employee holds an active Facebook account, but Facebook’s staffers are being quite brazen about their intentions using Google+.

And while the Facebook Friend Exporter extension is currently disabled, developer Mohamed Mansour is doing his best to re-enable the tool. “Facebook is trying too hard to not allow you to export your friends. They started to remove emails of your friends from your profile by today July 5, 2011. It will no longer work for many people,” he says. “No worries, a new version is on the making…I am bloody annoyed now, because this proves Facebook owns every user’s data on Facebook.”

Sure, it might be aggravating and borderline enraging to learn that you can’t quickly and easily pull what you want from Facebook, but that’s how it’s always been on the site. There hasn’t really been as much need as there is now, when a highly popular and seemingly competitive alternative is finally in our midst, so user dissatisfaction with the policy is sure to spike.

Molly McHugh
Former Social Media/Web Editor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
Meta’s latest courtroom losses expose a potential hole in social media’s strongest defense
Plaintiffs are treating engagement features as deliberately designed products, an argument that could make Section 230 far less useful
facebook

Two jury losses have given plaintiffs momentum against Meta, but they haven’t rewritten the rules for social media. One case relied on New Mexico consumer-protection laws. The other asked a California jury whether addictive design contributed to a young woman’s mental-health issues.

The verdicts, detailed by The Wall Street Journal, reached Meta through different legal routes. Together, they suggest Section 230 becomes a less dependable shield when a lawsuit centers on choices made by the platform itself.

Read more
Meta AI is moving into your Threads DMs, where awkward AI chats belong
Because not every AI conversation deserves a spot on your followers' timeline.
Meta AI in threads DM

One of the reasons Grok AI became so popular is because it let people chat with it directly on X, resulting in some hilarious conversations. And while the public availability of Grok AI on X has resulted in numerous safety issues, there's no denying that this openness played a major role in its rise. 

It seems Meta wanted the same, which became evident when the company started testing Meta AI directly on Threads a few months ago, letting users chat with it right in their feed. But not everyone was comfortable having those conversations out in the open, so Meta has just moved its Meta AI inside your Threads’ DMs. 

Read more
X Money is finally here, and it’s much more than a digital wallet
The new financial service aims to turn X into an app where users can pay, save, spend, and send money.
X Money featured

Elon Musk's vision of turning X into an "everything app" has taken another major step forward. The company has officially begun rolling out X Money to Premium and Premium+ subscribers in the United States. Rather than being just another digital wallet, X Money is designed as a full-fledged financial hub built directly into the social platform, allowing users to send money, receive payments, hold cash, earn interest, and spend through a Visa debit card—all without leaving the X app.

What is X Money, and who is it for?

Read more