Skip to main content

The FTC is suing AT&T for throttling customers with unlimited data

AT&T store.
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Bald-faced attempts by wireless carriers to move customers off unlimited data plans are nothing new, but apparently the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) isn’t taking them lying down. This afternoon, the department announced that it’s suing AT&T for throttling subscribers in an “unfair or deceptive manner.”

The FTC, which worked closely with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on the case, alleges that AT&T didn’t clearly articulate its throttling policy in marketing materials. The carrier importantly failed to impart the implications to customers who renewed their contracts, violating the FTC Act when it charged those who canceled their contracts after seeing reduced speeds.

Related: AT&T loses unlimited data throttling case, forced to pay iPhone owner $935

AT&T made a more egregious transgression in the seemingly arbitrary way it reduced bandwidth. The FTC estimates that roughly 3.5 million customers were impacted more than 25 million times over several years, many without notice or explanation. Their speed was repeatedly cut to dial-up levels on an average of 12 days out of the month, making services like Web browsing, GPS navigation, and video streaming nearly impossible to use.

Wayne Watts, AT&T’s top lawyer, dismissed the FTC’s allegations in a statement. “It’s baffling as to why the FTC would choose to take this action against a company that, like all major wireless providers, manages its network resources to provide the best possible service to all customers,” he wrote.

Prior to a policy revision that took effect in March of 2012, AT&T purported to throttle only the “top 5 percent of users.” That doesn’t appear to have been the case; the FTC notes that reductions in speed occurred regardless of network congestion, after as little as 2GB of usage. The carrier’s current policy states that customers with unlimited data will see reduced speeds after using 3GB of data on 3G, or 5GB of data on LTE, in a month.

Subscribers complained to AT&T by the thousands about slow speeds, and the carrier’s own internal research showed that consumers perceived the throttling practices as a “bait and switch.”

Related: Verizon tells FCC that data throttling is necessary to keep the network going

The FTC’s lawsuit marks the second time a federal agency has chastised a major wireless carrier for dishonest “network optimization” policies. Earlier this month, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler sent Verizon a strongly-worded letter regarding the carrier’s stated intention to begin throttling high users of unlimited 4G LTE data on heavily trafficked cell cites. “It is disturbing to me that Verizon Wireless would base its ‘network management’ on distinctions among its customers’ data plans, rather than on network architecture or technology,” Wheeler wrote.

Verizon later backtracked, announcing it had no plans to revise its throttling.

Editors' Recommendations

Kyle Wiggers
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kyle Wiggers is a writer, Web designer, and podcaster with an acute interest in all things tech. When not reviewing gadgets…
AT&T switches up its strategy with three new Unlimited data plans
att study income fiber at t store storefront lifestyle

AT&T is switching things up a little. The company has announced a series of new unlimited plans that start at $65 for a single line, or $35 per line with four lines. There are actually three new unlimited plans on offer -- including the Unlimited Starter plan, the Unlimited Extra plan, and the Unlimited Elite plan.

AT&T isn't the first provider to offer a range of unlimited plans -- Verizon has done the same, offering unlimited data in each, but different perks depending on the plan you go for.

Read more
AT&T accused of selling customers’ location data to bounty hunters and stalkers
att introduces 5g evolution at amp t

AT&T was hit with a lawsuit Tuesday accusing it of selling customers’ real-time location data to third parties like credit agencies and bail guarantors, along with bounty hunters and stalkers, without having customer consent. 

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht LLP are representing three AT&T customers in the class action suit against AT&T and other data aggregation companies, explicitly singling out LocationSmart and Zumigo. 

Read more
5 smartwatches you should buy instead of the Google Pixel Watch 2
The main workout screen on the Google Pixel Watch 2.

It's no secret that we weren't fans of the first Google Pixel Watch. However, Google heard all the criticism of its smartwatch debut and made amends, coming back with the Google Pixel Watch 2. Its second attempt was much better, adding strong performance, exceptional comfort, and a solid battery life to the fitness tracking of Fitbit. While it still has some issues, it's now a product we can recommend buying.

But just because it's now good doesn't mean there aren't alternatives to be had. There are a number of smartwatches that are better suited for those looking for a longer battery life, a focus on fitness, or a simpler experience. Some are just flat-out better. If you're considering buying a Google smartwatch, you need to know about these five smartwatches you should buy instead of the Google Pixel Watch 2.
Samsung Galaxy Watch 6

Read more