Skip to main content

3 key things I want to see in the next MacBook Pro

When Apple unveiled its new 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro laptops in October 2021, it was the biggest improvement to the device in years. One year on, we’re expecting an imminent refresh to both laptops.

This time, it’s expected to be a more subdued affair. But there are still plenty of ways Apple could take the MacBook Pro to new heights, even if we might have to wait a little longer to see them than this fall. From gaming tune-ups to Face ID, these are the things I’d love to see in Apple’s next pro-level laptops. Sure, they may be unlikely this time around, but it’s good to be optimistic, right?

Better gaming performance

Craig Ferguson introducing Mac Gaming at WWDC.

Let’s be honest here: MacBooks are not great gaming machines. But that hasn’t stopped Apple from taking some significant steps into this world in recent years. The company runs a dedicated gaming subscription service in the form of Apple Arcade, and brought noted game developers on stage at WWDC to announce a “new day” for gaming on Mac.

That’s not just down to software improvements, like MetalFX Upscaling and the Fast Resource Loading API – a big part will have to be played by hardware. And here, I’d love to see some tantalizing improvements this fall.

The new MacBook Pro models will almost certainly come loaded with M2 Pro and M2 Max chips. While the M2 chip’s architecture was not a revolution over its predecessor, the best improvements are likely to be seen in the pro-level chips. News outlet DigiTimes believes the M2 Pro and M2 Max could be made with a 3-nanometer process, which would likely result in significant performance gains. While that’s been disputed by analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, I’d love it if it came to fruition this fall.

Face ID — finally

mbile trends FaceID
Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images

There are three certainties in life: death, taxes, and the fact that I will continually harp on about Face ID coming to the Mac until it eventually happens. If Apple wants me to pipe down, it knows what to do.

Face ID works so well on iPhone because you don’t need to do anything out of the ordinary: Just look at your phone and it unlocks. The same would be true for the MacBook Pro. Instead of reaching up to the Touch ID button at the top of the keyboard, you’d just sit down, gaze at your screen, and voilà, it’s unlocked. It’s the kind of seamless interaction that Apple products are well known for, and would make so much sense for you and me.

It makes sense from Apple’s perspective, too. Apple is increasingly segmenting its products, and you can see that in the iPhone lineup, where there are rumors Apple will soon rebrand the Pro Max into an “iPhone Ultra” that is even more distinct from the Pro models. Adding Face ID to the MacBook Pro would align with that business plan by creating a clear division between the MacBook Pro and MacBook Air, and would give people a great reason to upgrade.

That makes me think Face ID on the Mac makes sense to Apple, and we know the company is experimenting with it due to a slate of patents testifying as much. And now that the MacBook Pro has a notch, what better way would there be to highlight its fancy new Face ID capabilities?

The Dynamic Island on a Mac

The iPhone 14 Pro's Dynamic Island showing the timer and music playing.
Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

It’s no secret that my favorite announcement from Apple’s September iPhone event was the Dynamic Island. It’s a work in progress for sure, but perfectly demonstrates how Apple is able to expertly blend hardware and software into something absolutely enchanting.

Now, what if you had that kind of functionality on a Mac? You would see background activities, like your currently playing music or screen recording status, while you were working on something else. Things can get awfully crowded awfully quickly on a Mac, with overlapping windows and multi-tasking workflows all vying for attention. The Dynamic Island could help ease some of that burden without requiring you to switch windows as often.

It would have to work very differently from how it’s done on the iPhone. For one thing, “flinging” an app into the Dynamic Island like on iPhone wouldn’t work on a Mac, since you just don’t interact with apps that way in macOS. At least one fan mockup has missed the mark, too. But if Apple could retool it to work on Macs and avoid the design pitfalls along the way, it could be a great new way to use apps on your laptop.

Editors' Recommendations

Alex Blake
In ancient times, people like Alex would have been shunned for their nerdy ways and strange opinions on cheese. Today, he…
A new iMac Pro could still launch. Here’s what I want from it
An Apple iMac Pro in a dark room flanked by two monitors, one on either side of it.

A week ago, a shocking report emerged: Apple apparently had no plans for a larger iMac, potentially meaning the iMac Pro was dead and buried. However, opposition voices soon emerged, and the consensus now seems to be that Apple has only ruled out the 27-inch iMac, not the idea of a larger all-in-one entirely.

In fact, just yesterday, Bloomberg Mark Gurman reiterated his previous claims that a larger iMac is still in the works. That’s an exciting rumor because I’ve felt for years that the iMac isn’t quite living up to its potential. If a larger, more powerful version really is still in development, it could be a seriously impressive device. Here’s everything I want to see from it.
More raw power

Read more
Here’s more proof that Apple is wrong about MacBook memory
The keyboard and trackpad of the MacBook Pro.

Apple has made some big claims about its unified memory over the past few years. That was made explicit this week when an Apple representative was asked why it has begun to sell an 8GB starting configuration of its new M3 Pro MacBook Pro, a laptop that's already been under scrutiny recently. The interviewee responded by saying that 8GB on a MacBook was equivalent to 16GB on a comparable system. But is that really true? It's been hard to test so far, but a recent video posted by Max Tech suggests that in practice, at least, it's not so simple.

M3 MacBook Pro 8GB vs 16GB RAM - How BAD is base model?

Read more
The MacBook Pro M3 doesn’t have a memory problem — it has a pricing problem
The MacBook Pro open on a table in front of a couch.

Apple just upset everyone, claiming that the 8GB of Unified Memory available in the base MacBook Pro M3 is "probably analogous to 16GB on other systems."

The MacBook Pro M3 has already come under fire for only including 8GB of Unified Memory in its base configuration, which runs $1,600. MacWorld recently ran a story criticizing the 8GB of memory in the MacBook Pro M3, saying, "If 8GB will be a bottleneck for many today, imagine the performance of that non-upgradeable laptop in a few years’ time."

Read more