Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Emerging Tech
  4. Photography
  5. News

AI can have trouble recognizing diversity and MIT research is finding out why

MIT research looks into why AI has trouble recognizing diverse faces

Add as a preferred source on Google

Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology are helping to pinpoint why facial recognition software is not accurate across all races — and the issue likely stems from both recycled code and a Caucasian-dominated computer engineering field.

Joichi Ito, MIT’s Media Lab director, said during an artificial intelligence panel held this week at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting that the software’s apparent trouble with recognizing diversity is likely because the engineers, and the faces used to train the software, are mostly white.

Recommended Videos

The issue goes back to the basics of artificial intelligence. Machine learning programs are based on teaching a computer with a set of data. In the case of facial recognition software, that computer is taught to recognize faces using a series of photos — sometimes of the engineers themselves. Since a majority of the photos used to train the software contain few minorities, the program often has trouble picking out those minority faces, according to Ito.

The issue spreads even further because many programmers don’t completely rewrite their code from scratch. Software engineers use libraries, or prewritten code, in multiple programs. When that prewritten code is based on a set of photographs that favors one race over another, that bias is integrated into multiple programs.

Joy Buolamwini, a graduate researcher on the project, said during a TED talk that she had to use a white mask for her face to be picked up by facial-recognition systems, from a cheap webcam to a smart mirror and even a social robot being tested on the opposite side of the globe.

Besides not being able to use a smart mirror or being misidentified in social media, bigger issues arise when law enforcement use facial-recognition software, she says, like when monitoring video feeds.

Bulamwini said a solution to the issue would be to simply train the facial-detection systems with a more diverse set of images. Developing diverse teams to work on the projects would also help create more immersive coding, she suggests, as well as auditing existing software to identify biases. At the end of her discussion in December, Bulamwini invited anyone interested in working to change bias in the code to join the Algorithmic Justice League.

Hillary K. Grigonis
Hillary never planned on becoming a photographer—and then she was handed a camera at her first writing job and she's been…
Google’s new Magic Pointer Play Store listing reveals a Gemini shortcut built for Googlebooks
The unannounced app turns the cursor into a contextual AI tool for search, image creation, and shopping
Plant, Text, Business Card

Google has quietly published a new Play Store listing for Magic Pointer, an unannounced app built for Googlebooks. Updated on July 10, the app turns the cursor into a Gemini shortcut that can act on whatever a user selects on screen.

Magic Pointer can send an image to Lens, generate a related image, or surface a shopping action without forcing users to open a separate chatbot. Regular Android devices currently show as incompatible, so the listing offers an early preview rather than a broad release.

Read more
You can stop using AI, but this new report says you probably can’t escape it
A UK survey found that most people feel AI exposure is unavoidable, raising harder questions about consent, privacy, and whether opting out is still realistic
AI Chatbots

More people are trying to use less AI, but avoiding it altogether may already be impossible.

A survey of 2,055 UK adults found that 42% deliberately limit how much AI they use. Another 70% said avoiding AI exposure would be difficult or impossible, even when they actively wanted less of it.

Read more
The face on an AI interviewer may matter as much as the decision it makes
Researchers found that race and gender matching changed how fairly rejected applicants viewed an automated interview, even though everyone received the same outcome
File, Computer Hardware, Electronics

An AI hiring system can treat every applicant the same and still leave some people feeling targeted. Researchers found that rejected candidates judged an automated interview differently depending on the race and gender of the avatar delivering the result.

Around 220 participants completed a simulated interview for a fictional customer support role with one of four photorealistic AI avatars. Everyone was rejected, yet perceptions of fairness shifted with the interviewer’s appearance. An algorithm audit could miss that reaction because candidates don’t experience the system as raw code. They experience a face asking questions and judging their answers.

Read more