Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Gaming
  4. News

AMD releases benchmark comparison to GTX 980 Ti

Add as a preferred source on Google

Any PC gamer will be well aware of the longstanding rivalry between AMD and Nvidia. The two companies have been embroiled in fierce competition for years, and the launch of any new component from either manufacturer is typically followed by endless comparisons with its equivalent from the other.

AMD’s R9 Fury X was officially unveiled at E3 earlier this week, and it looks set to be a very compelling proposition for any PC gamers looking to get ready for the flourishing world of virtual reality. With its potentially groundbreaking implementation of High-Bandwidth Memory, it could well be the graphics card to beat for 2015.

Recommended Videos

However, it’s easy enough for a graphics card to look good on paper — gamers are looking to see what it can do in practice. As such, AMD has released a detailed benchmark comparison between the R9 Fury X and NVIDIA’s GTX 980 Ti., as reported by Tech Report.

The information lists off average framerate readouts from each graphics card as they’re used to run notable titles at 4K resolution. Titles such as The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Assassin’s Creed: Unity and Crysis 3 were all included in the test.

The R9 Fury X came out on top in every game tested, albeit only by a whisker for some of the older titles. Given that AMD carried out the tests, this is rather unsurprising, but the results do speak for themselves. Perhaps notable by their absence are Mortal Kombat X and Grand Theft Auto V, two hugely popular console titles ported to the PC this year.

This comparison certainly paints the R9 Fury X in a very positive light, but obviously a more impartial test is required to see whether the card is as good as AMD suggests it is.

AMD will launch the R9 Fury X on June 24, with the standard R9 Fury releasing three weeks later on July 14.

Brad Jones
Brad is an English-born writer currently splitting his time between Edinburgh and Pennsylvania. You can find him on Twitter…
M6 iMac vs. M4 iMac: Skipping the M5 made a bigger difference than I expected
Same pretty aluminum shell. Much stronger M6 heart.
M6 iMac vs. M4 imac featured image.

After five years with Apple silicon, from the original M1 MacBook Air to the M5 MacBook Air released earlier this year, I've watched these chips mature not just on the spec sheet, but in real-world workflows and overall efficiency.

The new M6 chip might sound like a routine generational upgrade, but it's the company's first chip built on a 2nm manufacturing process, which brings meaningful improvements over previous Apple chips.

Read more
Gemini Notebook can now record lectures and meetings without the upload shuffle
The mobile app lets you capture up to an hour of live audio and immediately use it as a notebook source
Gemini Notebook update for students

Gemini Notebook’s mobile app now has a built-in recorder for capturing lectures and meetings as sources. You can record directly where you’ll use the material, skipping the separate recording app and the file upload afterward.

Google announced the feature on X, highlighting classroom lectures and team meetings as potential uses. It also works for capturing your own thoughts, so you can talk through an idea and bring that explanation into your notebook while it’s still fresh.

Read more
AI chatbots are so good at pretending to be human that other AIs can’t catch them
Seven chatbots played detective. The bots they were hunting walked away scot-free.
Artificial Intelligence

In 1950, Alan Turing asked whether machines can think. Rather than argue over definitions, he turned the question into a party game, where an interrogator trades typed messages with hidden players and tries to work out who is who. Since then, chatbots have gotten so good that they have already fooled humans in modern versions of the test.

So, four researchers from Paris Cité University asked the obvious follow-up question in a new study published in Computers in Human Behavior Reports: can AI at least catch its own kind?

Read more