Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Web
  4. Legacy Archives

AOL’s Patch, AmEx take aim at Groupon with Patch Deals

Add as a preferred source on Google

Patch-AmEx-Serve-Patch-Deals-v2
As if there weren’t enough daily deals services out there already, American Express and AOL’s Patch subsidiary network announced a “strategic partnership” today to launch a new Groupon-like service. Dubbed Patch Deals, the service will utilize AmEx’s digital payment technology, Serve.

Patch is the “hyperlocal” segment of the newly-formed AOL Huffington Post Media Group, with more than 800 neighborhood blogs and 850,000 businesses featured on the network. Through this online community, Patch Deals will offer customers the ability to save cash at local merchants. And, in turn, local merchants will be able to advertise their deals in a “streamlined, effective way,” the press release reads.

Recommended Videos

Basically, it’s exactly the same service that Groupon and LivingSocial offer, but with the AmEx tie-in to give it that little bit of added validity and accessibility.

To utilize the service, Patch users “may be offered Serve accounts” which would include a co-branded card that users can simply swipe to receive their discounted goods and/or services. This means “no coupons to print or codes to remember,” says Patch PR.

While the daily deals market is certainly hot right now — Groupon could potentially bring in $3 billion in revenue this year — Patch Deals seems more like a creative way to push American Express’ Serve payment service — a kind of pre-paid credit card meets PayPal, which launched in March — and boost traffic to AOL’s Patch network.

At least, that’s what it looks like at first glance. According to BNet‘s Erik Sherman, Patch Deals could be “more economically attractive for merchants because there’s no need for them to share revenue, and more convenient for customers, with a no-coupon form of in-person redemption, as well as online purchasing.” All of this adds up to profit for Patch/AmEx and loss of revenue for Groupon, LivingSocial, and the slew of (other) clones out there.

Patch Deals is currently only available in six communities, so we’ll have to wait to see whether the service can make it on the small scale before we can judge it on Groupon’s level.

Andrew Couts
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
Claude can now build live dashboards and animated explainers from your data
Anthropic just launched two new tools in beta: Claude Dashboards and Claude Motion.
claude-dashboard-motions-feature

Staring at a static slide while your presentation needs something more dynamic is a familiar workplace headache. Anthropic just gave Claude two new tools to fix that. Claude Dashboards and Claude Motion are both launching in beta today, letting you turn raw company data into live visuals and static ideas into short animated explainers.

How does Claude Dashboards work?

Read more
Don’t trust AI chatbots to pick your blood pressure monitor, study warns
Before trusting AI about your blood pressure monitor, check an independent validation registry instead first.
blood-pressure-monitor

Asking an AI chatbot whether your blood pressure monitor is actually trustworthy could leave you with a wrong answer. New research presented at the American Heart Association's Hypertension Scientific Sessions 2026 found that popular AI search tools can correctly identify validated monitors only 63-91% of the time, depending on which AI chatbot you use.

AI can identify validated home BP monitors only 2/3 of time

Read more
ChatGPT can imitate a cartoonist. Now it’s signing their name, too
OpenAI’s image generator has put real New Yorker cartoonists’ signatures on cartoons they didn’t draw, confusing readers about who made them
ChatGPT

Brendan Loper started hearing from people who thought he’d drawn a cartoon circulating online. His pen name was on it, but the image had been generated with ChatGPT.

Nieman Lab documented signatures belonging to more than 15 New Yorker contributors on AI-generated cartoons. Those names can give a reposted image a convincing credit line, even when the artist had no hand in making it.

Read more