Skip to main content

Even Cascade Lake X won’t save Intel from AMD’s Threadripper 3000 CPUs

New benchmarks for 10-core and 18-core Intel Cascade Lake X CPUs, the Core i9-10900X and 10980XE, have appeared on the Geekbench database and they’re strong performers. With 10 and 18 cores apiece, and double the thread support thanks to hyperthreading, they have single-threaded and multithreaded scores that are higher than even the supremely powerful, 28-core Intel Xeon W-3175X.

But none of that matters if AMD’s Threadripper 3000 CPUs prove to be as capable as their leaked benchmarks show. A new benchmark for a 32-core Threadripper 3000 “Sharktooth” CPU echoed earlier results with a single core and multicore score that takes a commanding lead over what the new Cascade Lake X chips are capable of.

Recommended Videos

AMD’s Threadripper CPUs have been nipping at Intel’s high-end desktop (HEDT) heels for several generations. The first-generation showed that high-core-count CPUs didn’t have to be expensive, and the second showed that stacking extra cores (up to 32 on the 2990WX) could give Intel’s faster, but lower-core-count chips a real run for their money.

But memory latency concerns held even AMD’s best Threadripper CPUs back from dominating in several benchmarks and real-world situations. A third-generation of Threadripper CPUs is expected to change that.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 1950X Review
Bill Roberson/Digital Trends

Based on the same Zen 2 architecture as the mainstream Ryzen 3000 chips, third-generation Threadripper processors should have the same major improvements in instructions per clock and memory efficiency, as well as a modest improvement in clock speed. All of that allowed the 32-core Threadripper chip, with its max turbo speed of 4.3Ghz, to hit a single-core score of 5,519 in the Geekbench results. In comparison, the 10-core Cascade Lake X processor, with its higher 4.4GHz clock speed, managed just 5,204, as per WCCFTech.

As for multithreaded performance, it’s a complete washout. The Threadripper 3000 chip achieved a score of 68,279 points, while the 10900X managed just 39,717. That’s a good score, and in-fact in excess of the 38,000 we’ve seen with the 28-core W-3175X, but it’s not a patch on the AMD offering.

That’s perhaps an unfair comparison, considering the core count differences. But a much closer competitor would be the high-end, Intel Core i9-10980XE. Its benchmark numbers, while closer, though, still fall behind the AMD alternative. First spotted by Twitter user @momomo_us on the Geekbench database, its single-threaded score was 5,381. Its clock speed hit a maximum of 3.93GHz, which suggests that the IPC of this chip is stronger than that of the Threadripper chip, but with a clock speed discrepancy, the Intel chip just couldn’t quite compete.

Its multithreaded score took quite a leap over the 10900X, hitting 51,514, but that’s still far behind the 32-core Threadripper.

Cascade Lake-X is designed to replace the existing Skylake-X lineup of 9000-series Intel HEDT chips. Since it’ll be based on a refined version of the same 14nm process, we don’t expect major improvements in its performance or capabilities and with the 10-core and 18-core variants looking very much like slightly tweaked versions of their ninth-generation counterparts, we expect to see 12, 14, and 16-core options available when Cascade Lake X debuts.

Typically, all Intel HEDT chips feature the same single-core boost clock, with all-core clocks being slightly higher on the chips with lower core counts. If that proves true with the 10-series Cascade Lake X chips, we wouldn’t expect any of them to have much greater single-threaded performance than we see here, barring a slight bump in clock speed over what is likely an engineering sample in this benchmark.

That puts AMD in a commanding position when it comes to next-generation workstation desktops. Both upcoming generations of Intel and AMD CPUs are expected to make their appearance before the end of the year, so they are likely to go head to head in the HEDT space. If that turns out to be true, though, the best performance per dollar will almost-certainly rest with AMD’s new Threadripper CPUs.

Intel wouldn’t be out of the running entirely, though. They will likely benefit from an expansive existing install base. Cascade Lake X is expected to be supported by existing X299 motherboards and the LGA 2066 socket, so an upgrade to the 10th generation will be cheaper than converting to AMD, even if the performance increase isn’t likely to be dramatic.

Updated September 20, 2019: Added benchmark results for the 18-core Intel Core i9-10980XE.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is a freelance evergreen writer and occasional section coordinator, covering how to guides, best-of lists, and…
AMD’s Ryzen 7 9800X3D may not give Intel any breathing room
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D installed in a motherboard.

The competition between Intel Arrow Lake and AMD Zen 5 hasn't been as fierce as usual, with both lineups delivering small gen-to-gen improvements. However, it seems that AMD may soon add a staple to its list of the best processors, and the CPU might be announced at the worst possible time for Intel. I'm talking about the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, which now has a rumored release date alongside some performance benchmarks.

The release date speculation was initially shared on Bilibili, but the user has since deleted their post. However, the discussion continued on Chiphell forums, spilling the beans on both the official announcement date and the possible release date.

Read more
Sorry, gamers — Intel’s new CPUs won’t deliver any gains
A render for an Intel Arrow Lake CPU.

Intel is setting expectations for its upcoming Arrow Lake-S desktop CPUs. Although the company is holding strong that the new generation will be competitive with the best processors when they release on October 24, the new range of CPUs won't deliver much, if any, performance gains for gamers -- and that's coming from Intel itself.

To kick off the Arrow Lake generation, now called Intel Core Ultra 200S, Intel is releasing five processors. You can see the standard Core Ultra 9, 7, and 5 models in the table below, along with Core Ultra 7 and 5 models that cut the integrated graphics for a slightly lower price. All five of the processors are unlocked for overclocking with the new LGA 1851 socket. Unlike AMD's new Zen 5 CPUs, Core Ultra 200S chips require a new motherboard as Intel retires its LGA 1700 socket.

Read more
AMD just snatched the performance crown, even with an impaired Ryzen 9 9950X
A hand holding AMD's Ryzen 9 9950X.

Early benchmarks for AMD's upcoming Ryzen 9 9950X are starting to make the rounds, and they already show some impressive performance gains. Igor Kavinski took to the Anandtech forums to share some benchmarks in Cinebench that were gathered with an engineering sample of the Ryzen 9 9950X, and AMD's upcoming CPU already managed to outpace Intel's Core i9-14900KS, according to Wccftech.

At 160 watts, the Ryzen 9 9950X managed a multi-core score of 42,336 in Cinebench R23, while the Core i9-14900KS reached 41,285 in its default Performance power profile. Intel's CPU regains a lead in its Extreme power mode, but it also consumes 320 watts -- double what the Ryzen 9 9950X sipped down. There's a little more to the story outside of the raw score, though.

Read more