Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

FCC: 80 Pct of Americans Don’t Know their Broadband Speed

Add as a preferred source on Google
Image used with permission by copyright holder

A new survey conducted by the Federal Communications Commission‘s Consumer Task Force has found that, overall, 80 percent of Americans don’t know the speed of their broadband Internet connections (PDF)—but most respondents are satisfied with the speed their getting…whatever it is. The survey is part of a broader initiative at the FCC to measure the actual broadband speeds consumers receive from ISPs and compare them to the speeds that broadband providers advertise.

“Speed matters,” said FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, in a statement. “The more broadband d what speeds they get, the more they can make the market work and push faster speeds over broadband networks.”

Recommended Videos

The FCC’s focus on the actual bandwidth being delivered to consumers comes as the agency is putting forward its National Broadband Plan, which seeks (in part) to reclassify broadband Internet service more like telephone service to preserve things like consumers’ ability to access any lawful application or service, but not requiring providers accede to rate regulations and facilities-sharing requirements. But the timing of the Consumers Task Force’s study only highlights the elephant in the room: neither the FCC nor anybody else really has much idea what broadband is available to consumers, and whether consumers get anything remotely akin to the services being advertised. If the results of the survey are any indicators, consumers don’t really seem to care…although the survey noted some variations, with women and respondents age 65 or older less likely to know the speed of their broadband connection.

In an effort to map out existing broadband access to U.S. homes, the FCC is looking for 10,000 volunteers to participate in a study (conducted by SamKnows) measuring home broadband speeds: participants would have specialized hardware installed in their home that would measure the performance of their broadband connection and report the results back to the FCC; participants will also be able to see the performance of their own broadband service. Interested consumers can register for the test at www.TestMyISP.com.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more
Google Earth’s AI misadventure lasted only a day. It was a tale of dangerous ignorance.
Nuclear reactors, tanks, and historical destruction on a life-like satellite map? Yeah, that's bad.
Nano Banana AI image generator representation.

Technology behemoths are clearly not reading the room, or they are just moving faster than they should when it comes to AI deployment. Google has already stuffed its Gemini AI in every corner of its software stack, from Android to daily productivity tools like Gmail that are used by hundreds of millions of users every day. AI is everywhere. Not all of it is bad, mind you. But in a few places, it just feels forced.

In its latest AI-fication experiment, the company targeted Google Earth. The idea was to let the audience use its Nano Banana 2 AI image generator and make images that can be placed on the map view. On paper, it's a cool idea. What would the Colosseum of Rome look like in your urban neighborhood? Yeah, fun stuff like that.

Read more