Skip to main content

Leaked AMD Ryzen 3000 mobile benchmarks look fit for thin, low-power laptops

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G & Ryzen 3 2200G Review fingers motherboard
Bill Roberson/Digital Trends

AMD made quite the comeback with its first Ryzen processor, but that was several years ago. Now, ahead of the release of AMD’s Ryzen 3000 series processors for desktops, we’re already starting to see benchmarks for the mobile variants of the company’s next-generation processor leaked. These processors are part of the Picasso family and are designed for ultra-low power consumption. Benchmark results for the Ryzen 3000 APU — which AMD calls an application processing unit, as it combines AMD’s processor and graphics capabilities on a single chipset — were published on Geekbench, showing the chipset family running on a number of laptops made by HP in 14- and 17-inch sizes.

The chipsets in the Ryzen 3000 APU series include the 300U, 3200U, 3300U, 3500U and 3700U, with the 300U believed to be a low-end Athlon chip, according to Tom’s Hardware. All the other APUs appear to integrate AMD’s Radeon Vega Mobile graphics. Aside from the 300U, other APUs in the series come with either two cores and four threads, four cores and four threads, or four cores and eight threads. Geekbench lists the processor’s hardware architecture as Raven Ridge, so it may be based on a similar platform.

When Raven Ridge debuted in late 2017, it was based on a 14nm manufacturing process at the time. On the desktop side, at least, AMD is believed to be moving forward with a 7nm architecture for Ryzen 3000 CPUs, which would allow the company to overtake larger rival Intel, which has struggled with yields on sub-12nm chip designs.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Though Geekbench didn’t have single-core or multicore scores for all the 3000 series APUs, the best scores published were from the 3500U — a quad-core, 8-thread processor — which got a high of 3,870 points on single-core tests and 11,284 on multicore tests. The chipset is said to have a 2.1Ghz base speed, but its boost speed wasn’t available on Geekbench. The 3500U is expected to succeed the current Ryzen 5 2500U, so the new chip will likely feature a total of 8 CUs (Compute Units), the equivalent of 512 stream processors, according to Wccftech.

For comparison, Geekbench lists the single-core performance of Intel’s 8th-Generation Core i5-8250U in the 4,500 range, and multicore performance sits in the 14,000 range when tested on a Windows system. Given the ultra-low-power nature of the Ryzen 3000 APUs, the scores are more competitive against Intel’s Y-series processors, which are more commonly referred to as Core M. The 8th-generation Intel Core i7-7Y75- which is found on Apple’s MacBook, posted a higher score in the 4,200 range for single core, but significantly lower multicore results in the 7,000 to 8,000 range, depending on the laptop used for testing.

With CES around the corner, we will likely hear more about AMD’s plans in the processor space soon, both in desktop and in mobile.

Chuong Nguyen
Silicon Valley-based technology reporter and Giants baseball fan who splits his time between Northern California and Southern…
AMD just snatched the performance crown, even with an impaired Ryzen 9 9950X
A hand holding AMD's Ryzen 9 9950X.

Early benchmarks for AMD's upcoming Ryzen 9 9950X are starting to make the rounds, and they already show some impressive performance gains. Igor Kavinski took to the Anandtech forums to share some benchmarks in Cinebench that were gathered with an engineering sample of the Ryzen 9 9950X, and AMD's upcoming CPU already managed to outpace Intel's Core i9-14900KS, according to Wccftech.

At 160 watts, the Ryzen 9 9950X managed a multi-core score of 42,336 in Cinebench R23, while the Core i9-14900KS reached 41,285 in its default Performance power profile. Intel's CPU regains a lead in its Extreme power mode, but it also consumes 320 watts -- double what the Ryzen 9 9950X sipped down. There's a little more to the story outside of the raw score, though.

Read more
I saw AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs in action, but I still have one big question
A hand holding AMD's Ryzen 9 9950X.

AMD's Ryzen 9000 CPUs are mostly a known quantity. They were a surprise announcement last month, and they're arriving soon -- AMD confirmed the lineup of four CPUs is arriving on July 31. But after seeing them in action this past week at AMD's Zen 5 Tech Day, I still have one lingering question -- how much will they cost?

That's been top of mind in recent weeks as we inch closer to the release of these CPUs. Some recent leaks suggest AMD could lower the price of its upcoming desktop chips, but we haven't heard anything official from Team Red yet. We may not, either, at least not until reviews go live.

Read more
AMD is about to give your Ryzen CPU a big upgrade
A hand holding the Ryzen 9 7950X in front of a green light.

AMD's Curve Optimizer is by far my favorite feature of Ryzen CPUs. It allows you to tune the voltage of a process across the frequency range with a simple offset, and it's been an indispensable tool as I've undervolted the Ryzen 7 7800X3D inside my small form factor gaming PC. And with Ryzen 9000, AMD could be pushing the feature even further with something called Curve Shaper.

The news comes from 1usmus, a developer who's created tools for Ryzen CPUs such as the DRAM Calculator and the Hydra overclocking utility. The developer says Curve Shaper will allow Curve Optimizer to work across the entire temperature range. Previously, according to the developer, stability concerns lead to cases where your processor would be running at a high temperature without receiving much benefit from Curve Optimizer. "Now everything will change," the developer wrote in a post on X (formerly Twitter).

Read more