Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Entertainment
  4. Legacy Archives

[Updated] FBI confirms North Korea hacked Sony pictures, Obama pledges response

Add as a preferred source on Google

Update 12/19/2014 2:55pm Pacific: Sony Entertainment’s CEO, Michael Lynton, responded to President Obama in an interview with CNN, saying “The president, the press, and the public are mistaken as to what actually happened.” He clarified that Sony did not willingly cancel the movie, but was forced to after all major theater chains in North America pulled out of the release. Lynton said Sony is considering a release through on-demand services, but so far no partner is willing to show the film. 

Update 12/19/2014 11:17am Pacific: In a press conference President Obama took a question asking if he thought Sony did the right thing by pulling The Interview. He responded “I am sympathetic to the concerns they faced. Having said that, yes, I think they made a mistake.” He went on to say that the United States can’t tolerate a situation where “publishers start engaging in self-censorship because they don’t want to offend the sensibilities of someone whose sensibilities probably need to be offended.” 

Recommended Videos

The President also said further action will be taken by the government. “[They] caused a lot of damage, and we will respond. We will respond proportionally, in a time and manner we choose.” He did not clarify what the response might be. Further, he said there’s currently no reason to believe North Korea acted in conjunction with any other country or organization. 

A new statement posted on the FBI’s official website makes it clear: North Korea is the party responsible for the attack on Sony Pictures. This is the first announcement from a U.S. intelligence or law enforcement agency made on the record, and it all but confirms that widespread speculation about the nation’s culpability was correct.

The FBI has been working with Sony since the first few hours of the attack in an attempt to minimize the damage and figure out who was responsible. In the weeks that have passed, several key pieces of evidence have been discovered which point the finger directly at North Korea.

Perhaps the most damning point is the use of techniques and malware that the FBI has linked to North Korea in the past. Software used for sophisticated attacks such as those deployed by The Guardians of Peace require custom solutions, and hacking organizations often re-deploy malware when possible rather than waste time re-writing it from scratch. Consider it a digital fingerprint.

A link has also formed between the infrastructure used for this attack and that used for past attacks on U.S. institutions by North Korea. I.P. addresses known to belong to the nation-states computers were connected to the Sony hack. The addresses were coded into the malware itself, presumably so it could communicate with its masters.

The statement goes on to say that “North Korea’s attack on Sony Pictures Entertainment (SPE) reaffirms that cyber threats pose one of the gravest national security dangers to the United States.” It goes on to re-affirm the FBI’s commitment to supporting any company that finds itself victim of a cyber attack, no matter the source.

Everyone already suspected the country’s involvement, so the FBI’s words are no surprise, but the fact that a U.S. government agency has pointed the finger is significant and suggests some form of diplomatic response may be in the works. President Obama is due to give an end-of-year press conference today, December 19th, before he leaves for his Christmas vacation. It would be an ideal time for the President to outline the government’s response if one is indeed intended.

Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
The Mac Pro nearly received an M3 Extreme chip twice as powerful as M3 Ultra
High production costs likely killed Apple’s M3 Extreme plans
Apple's Mac Pro on a table at a press event.

Apple discontinued the Mac Pro earlier this year, ending a 20-year run for a computer that once represented the very best of the company’s desktop lineup. However, Apple reportedly had much bigger plans for the machine before ultimately replacing it with the Mac Studio.

According to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, Apple developed an M3 Extreme chip that could have offered twice as many CPU and GPU cores as the M3 Ultra. The processor was intended to sit above the Ultra tier and could have finally given the Mac Pro the performance advantage it badly needed. Apple eventually abandoned the chip due to concerns over production costs and limited demand for such an expensive machine.

Read more
Hidden prompts can secretly rewrite an AI’s memory, and researchers say that’s a serious problem
Researchers discover AI attack that rewrites an assistant's long-term memory
Chatbot on a smartphone.

Large language models are getting better at remembering us. Whether it's your preferred writing style, recurring tasks, shopping habits or project deadlines, AI assistants are increasingly storing long-term memories to make future conversations feel more personal and useful. But according to new research, that same feature could become one of AI's biggest security vulnerabilities.

Researchers from New Mexico State University have demonstrated a new attack called GhostWriter, capable of secretly planting false memories inside AI agents. Rather than stealing information outright, the attack manipulates what an AI remembers, potentially causing it to make dangerous decisions long after the original attack has taken place.

Read more
This experiment shows how easy it is to poison an open-weight AI model for under $100
This research raises new doubts about trusting open weight AI models.
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

Open-weight AI models have been having a moment lately. Just this month, Moonshot's massive Kimi K3 model landed close behind Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol in several benchmarks, all while remaining fully open-weight and downloadable by anyone.

However, Katie Paxton-Fear, a cybersecurity lecturer at Manchester Metropolitan University and staff security advocate at Semgrep, managed to poison an open-weight model and proved how easily that openness can be turned against you (via The Register).

Read more