Skip to main content

This algorithm identifies the key ingredients to winning a debate

Debate has always been integral to democracy. In its most beautiful form, a presidential debate is a meeting of minds, a moment when two or more upright and well-spoken potential statesmen argue over the fate of a nation and enlighten listeners about their policy positions. In its ugliest appearance, debate devolves into a charade viewed for entertainment rather than illumination, a circus performance full of eye-rolling, name-calling, and deflections.

A team of researchers at Northeastern University have taken on the task of predicting debate “winners” by deconstructing their arguments, hoping to encourage more meaningful meetings. The researchers aren’t focused on style but content — they’re concern isn’t with fancy rhetoric or theatrics but with sound reasoning. It’s an idealized outlook of debates but one they hope will help support the democratic practice.

To aid in their efforts, they developed an artificial intelligence algorithm that can pick out features of a strong argument. They trained the system on 118 Intelligence Squared debates and, simply by analyzing the argument, the algorithm was able to predict the winner nearly three-quarters of the time. A paper detailing their research was published in the journal Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics.

“Using just the debate transcripts, our model is able to predict debate … which side is likely to win over more audience support with around 74 percent accuracy,” Nick Beauchamp, an assistant political science professor at Northeastern and one of the project leads, told Digital Trends. “Many people have tried to predict debate winners before using only surface stylistic features, and ours uses all these sorts of features as well — sentiment, abstraction, sentence complexity — but using those things only gets you about 66 percent accuracy. It’s only when you add in this notion of latent arguments and argument strength that you able to predict winners so accurately.”

Despite focusing mainly on the strength of arguments, the researchers found that certain stylistic features appeared in more winning debates. Namely, concrete language (nouns, verbs, numbers) and simpler sentences. Stronger arguments also emphasize more negative emotions like anger and disgust, while weaker ones feature more positive sentiments like hope and trust. Weaker debaters also tend to use “you” and I,” while stronger ones include “we” and “us.”

Beauchamp admits that predicting a presidential debate winner (particularly after the fact) has limited use in the real world. However, he sees some utility in using this type of tool to explore and explain how and why debates are won. He envisions such a tool providing real-time feedback to viewers during a debate, from highlighting a strong and sound argument to flagging a weak one.

Dyllan Furness
Dyllan Furness is a freelance writer from Florida. He covers strange science and emerging tech for Digital Trends, focusing…
Fake news? A.I. algorithm reveals political bias in the stories you read
newspaper stack

Here in 2020, internet users have ready access to more news media than at any other point in history. But things aren’t perfect. Click-driven ad models, online filter bubbles, and the competition for readers’ attention means that political bias has become more entrenched than ever. In worst-case scenarios, this can tip over into fake news. Other times, it simply means readers receive a slanted version of events, without necessarily realizing that this is the case.

What if artificial intelligence could be used to accurately analyze political bias to help readers better understand the skew of whatever source they are reading? Such a tool could conceivably be used as a spellcheck- or grammar check-type function, only instead of letting you know when a word or sentence isn’t right, it would do the same thing for the neutrality of news media -- whether that be reporting or opinion pieces.

Read more
According to advanced swarm A.I., this is who will win Super Bowl LIV
Jimmy Garoppolo

What is Swarm AI ?

Want to save yourself a few hours of elevated heart rate this Sunday? Allow us to unceremoniously spoil the result of the much anticipated Kansas City Chiefs vs. San Francisco 49ers game. In what is genuinely one of the biggest toss-ups in recent Super Bowl history, you can take it to the bank that Kansas City has it in the bag. Well, at least sort-of in the bag.

Read more
Meet the 9 Wikipedia bots that make the world’s largest encyclopedia possible
bots that make wikipedia work wikipediabotsfeature

The idea behind Wikipedia is, let’s face it, crazy. An online encyclopedia full of verifiable information, ideally with minimal bias, that can be freely edited by anyone with an internet connection is a ridiculous idea that was never going to work. Yet somehow it has.

Nineteen years old this month (it was launched in January 2001, the same month President George W. Bush took office), Wikipedia’s promise of a collaborative encyclopedia has, today, resulted in a resource consisting of more than 40 million articles in 300 different languages, catering to an audience of 500 million monthly users. The English language Wikipedia alone adds some 572 new articles per day.

Read more