Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Robots demolish a site deemed too hazardous for workers

Add as a preferred source on Google

Robots demolished a power station in the U.K. this week, but don’t worry, it wasn’t Skynet becoming self aware. The whole thing was planned, by humans.

While robots aren’t usually relied upon for demolition work, in this case the site had been deemed too hazardous for humans after four workers were tragically killed when one of the buildings partially collapsed. In the aftermath, a 160-foot exclusion zone was set up, with no people allowed to enter the site.

Recommended Videos

As a result, a plan was put in place to use robots for the task — ranging from a smaller robot weighing in the region of 88 pounds to super-heavy machines weighing 4 tons. For the first part of the work, two robots made by the Irish company Reamda, referred to as the Robot Reacher and R-Evolve, surveyed the site. This involved taking photos and video, as well as utilizing a 3D laser scanner to study the six support columns of the building intended for demolition.

The gathered data was then passed onto another company, which built replicas of the columns so that the initiative could be tested before going ahead. Once all parties involved were satisfied, remotely-operated vehicles (ROVs) belonging to Reamda and a Swedish demolition company called Brokk were sent in to place the explosive charges using robotic manipulator arms.

The demolition was successfully completed without incident.

“As technology continues to evolve it makes sense that we’ll hand more and more of these dangerous tasks over to machine,” Padraig O’Connor, managing director of Reamda, told Digital Trends. “It’s the same as bomb disposal and the way that we used to send in officers wearing protective suits: Today that’s considered a last resort.

“But this isn’t going to be about replacing humans with robots,” he continued. “You’ll still be benefitting from human experts’ skill and knowledge of these sites; it’s just that we’ll be able to send machines in to do the dangerous part of the job. We’re not doing anyone out of work, it’s just about putting people in a different seat.”

Luke Dormehl
I'm a UK-based tech writer covering Cool Tech at Digital Trends. I've also written for Fast Company, Wired, the Guardian…
Yet another study says AI is bad for elections, and the rabbit hole gets worse
AI may be an election bomb waiting for someone to light the fuse
Voters cast their ballots on Election Day

Another election, another study has concluded that asking an AI chatbot for political guidance is a spectacularly bad idea. Research conducted during Hungary’s 2026 parliamentary election found that ChatGPT and Google Gemini offered not just inaccurate but also inconsistent and unreliable voting advice. The chatbots misclassified voter profiles, overlooked relevant parties, recommended parties absent from the ballot, and sometimes produced materially different answers when given the same information repeatedly.

AI keeps failing the voter test

Read more
Samsung’s humanoid robot ambitions are real, but factories come first
Samsung’s new robotics division has humanoids in its sights, although its immediate business is far more practical factory automation
Robot Touch Human Finger

Samsung wants a place in the humanoid race, but its new robotics push begins with machines built for factories rather than homes.

The CEO-led RX robotics division will initially focus on manufacturing robots. Samsung has separately identified humanoids as a priority, although it hasn’t announced a commercial model or explained where one fits into the division’s immediate plans.

Read more
The future of AI may depend on this one behind-the-scenes change
Running Claude on Android.

Whenever a new AI model arrives, it's easy to get caught up in the bells and whistles. We talk about how much smarter it is, how quickly it answers questions, or how realistic its images have become. But here's the thing: none of that matters much if the AI can't reliably work with the apps and services people use every day.

That's why an upcoming update to the Model Context Protocol (MCP) caught my attention. It isn't a new chatbot or a fancy AI model. In fact, most people will never even know it's happening. But it could quietly make the AI ecosystem a lot healthier. If you've never heard of MCP before, don't worry. Think of it as a shared language that lets AI assistants safely talk to apps like Gmail, Slack, calendars, databases, and countless other services. Instead of every company inventing its own way to make those connections, MCP gives everyone a common rulebook.

Read more