Your DNA may hold clues to when you’ll lose your virginity, researchers say

By Ed Oswald Published April 19, 2016

DNA research has tons of great uses, from telling us who our ancestors were to unlocking new ways of detecting serious diseases far more quickly than traditional methods. But did you know it might also hold the key to when you’ll first have sex?

As weird as it sounds, Researchers at the University of Cambridge in England found that certain genetic traits predispose you to have sex earlier or later in life. The DNA of more than 380,000 people was studied, and it was found that genetics plays a role in the age at which someone first has sex about a quarter of the time.

Recommended Videos

There are other factors at play as well. Researchers have found that the average age of sexual maturity dropped nearly six years in the 100 years ending in 1980. The culprit? Changes in nutritional habits and the physical size of children over that period, as well as the introduction of man-made hormone-disrupting chemicals.

Genes likely have a lot to do with when a child enters puberty, and whether or not someone is risk-averse. Those more willing to take risks might be more likely to have sex earlier in life, while the more timid might wait until the time more accepted by societal norms, the study suggests.

Your genes may also influence the age when you have your first child, and how many times you’ll reproduce, the study authors say. This research also seems to back up earlier research that early sexual activity may lead to other issues.

“We have already shown that early puberty and rapid childhood growth adversely affect disease risks in later life, but we have now shown that the same factors can have a negative effect at a much younger age, including earlier sexual intercourse and poorer education attainment,” study co-author Dr. Ken Ong said in a statement.

Ong and his team uncovered at least 38 gene variants that showed some correlation between the presence of the variant and the age of first sexual activity. Based on this research, the team hopes that in the future those children most at risk might be able to receive more targeted education and guidance to prevent risky behaviors from happening in the first place.

The study was first published in the scientific journal Nature Genetics on Monday.

Former Contributor

For fifteen years, Ed has written about the latest and greatest in gadgets and technology trends. At Digital Trends, he's…

Topics

Emerging Tech

Scammers are teaching AI to sound like you, and research says our brains are falling for it

Has your accent just become a security vulnerability? AI scammers are getting too good at sounding local

Scammers are turning trusted news brands into investment traps

The next scam call you receive may not sound like a robot, a call center, or even someone pretending to be your relative. AI voice generators have become capable of reproducing regional accents and dialects that sound convincing enough that researchers are warning they could become a potent social-engineering tool.

For example, a scammer could use an accent familiar to a targeted community to make a suspicious call sound considerably more trustworthy.

Emerging Tech

Scientists found a way to turn plastic bottles into cookies you can actually eat

hand holding a cookie

Plastic bottles and cookies rarely show up in the same sentence, but a team of researchers just gave us a reason to talk about both together. According to Science Daily, scientists at Southern Illinois University Carbondale have engineered yeast that can turn waste from plastic bottles and old crop leftovers into real food ingredients and create cookies.

The work began as part of a NASA program exploring how astronauts might produce their own food during deep space missions, since resupply runs from Earth aren't exactly realistic that far out. The researchers' big insight was simple: plastic bottles are packed with carbon, and so, as it turns out, is food. That single connection became the foundation for everything that followed.

Computing

Students who use AI every day may be falling behind, while moderate users pull ahead

New global testing data suggests more AI in the classroom isn't automatically better.

I assumed more AI access might help students learn faster. However, a new OECD study dispels that misconception for me and everyone else who gave their children a paid version of AI chatbots, thinking it would help them through their educational journey.

According to PISA 2025 data from 760,000 students in 91 countries, students who use AI daily score meaningfully worse on standardized tests than their peers. The full picture is more complicated than a simple ban would fix.