No surprise: Sony wins Pwnie Award for Most Epic Fail

By Derek Mead August 5, 2011

The Black Hat security conference in Las Vegas is one of the largest of its kind on the planet, and as such the cachet of its annual awards, the Pwnies, is unrivaled in security circles. That is, of course, assuming you’re didn’t win the Pwnie for Most Epic Fail. Sorry Sony.

This year Sony, who shut down the Playstation Network for a whole month in the spring, was so completely and utterly considered a failure by security folks that there was no doubt the company would win. Even crazed Vegas gamblers couldn’t have bet against Sony’s win: the company’s security report card was so bad this year they were the only nominee.

Related Videos

The PSN debacle was what secured Sony the title. Shutting down the network completely for a whole month, with other services taking even longer to be brought back online, is a very lengthy period for anyone to find, analyze and patch a breach. Even sillier, Sony execs made it clear during the shutdown that the company had indeed already known about the vulnerability, but had assumed no one would be interested or be able to crack it. That type of complacency is what guarantees someone the Most Epic Fail Pwnie, not to mention the fact that the PSN breach allowed millions of users’ data to get stolen.

Public ridicule aside, the Pwnies also celebrate the best and brightest in the security industry. Unlike Sony, Norwegian security company Norman actually showed up to the event to celebrate researcher Tarjei Mandt who won the Pwnie for Best Privilege Escalation Bug. Mandt came up with his own method for exploiting the Windows kernel and found over 40 vulnerabilities. In another nod to Sony, famed console cracker Geohot, who’s previously pointed out vulnerabilities in the PS3, won the Pwnie for Best Song for a rap video he posted about his ongoing legal battle with the company.

Finally, the counterpart to the Most Epic Fail award is the Pwnie for Epic 0wnage. With a plethora of high-profile hacking cases this year, Anonymous, LulzSec, Bradley Manning and Wikileaks were all nominated for the award. But the Pwnie ended up going to Stuxnet, possibly the most sophisticated worm ever created. Fittingly, no one was around to accept the award because, well, we still don’t know who made it. Epic 0wnage indeed.

Photo via the Pwnie Awards

Editors' Recommendations

Topics

Emerging Tech

Computing

Meta wants to supercharge Wikipedia with an AI upgrade

Wikipedia has a problem. And Meta, the not-too-long-ago rebranded Facebook, may just have the answer.

Let’s back up. Wikipedia is one of the largest-scale collaborative projects in human history, with more than 100,000 volunteer human editors contributing to the construction and maintenance of a mind-bogglingly large, multi-language encyclopedia consisting of millions of articles. Upward of 17,000 new articles are added to Wikipedia each month, while tweaks and modifications are continuously made to its existing corpus of articles. The most popular Wiki articles have been edited thousands of times, reflecting the very latest research, insights, and up-to-the-minute information.

Mobile

The next big thing in science is already in your pocket

A researcher looks at a protein diagram on his monitor

Supercomputers are an essential part of modern science. By crunching numbers and performing calculations that would take eons for us humans to complete by ourselves, they help us do things that would otherwise be impossible, like predicting hurricane flight paths, simulating nuclear disasters, or modeling how experimental drugs might effect human cells. But that computing power comes at a price -- literally. Supercomputer-dependent research is notoriously expensive. It's not uncommon for research institutions to pay upward of $1,000 for a single hour of supercomputer use, and sometimes more, depending on the hardware that's required.

But lately, rather than relying on big, expensive supercomputers, more and more scientists are turning to a different method for their number-crunching needs: distributed supercomputing. You've probably heard of this before. Instead of relying on a single, centralized computer to perform a given task, this crowdsourced style of computing draws computational power from a distributed network of volunteers, typically by running special software on home PCs or smartphones. Individually, these volunteer computers aren't particularly powerful, but if you string enough of them together, their collective power can easily eclipse that of any centralized supercomputer -- and often for a fraction of the cost.

Computing

Why AI will never rule the world

image depicting AI, with neurons branching out from humanoid head

Call it the Skynet hypothesis, Artificial General Intelligence, or the advent of the Singularity -- for years, AI experts and non-experts alike have fretted (and, for a small group, celebrated) the idea that artificial intelligence may one day become smarter than humans.

According to the theory, advances in AI -- specifically of the machine learning type that's able to take on new information and rewrite its code accordingly -- will eventually catch up with the wetware of the biological brain. In this interpretation of events, every AI advance from Jeopardy-winning IBM machines to the massive AI language model GPT-3 is taking humanity one step closer to an existential threat. We're literally building our soon-to-be-sentient successors.