Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Mobile
  4. News

There’s Peeple the product and Peeple the app, and they’re really, really different

Add as a preferred source on Google

It’s a classic case of mistaken identity — two tech products, one name. And if this horrible, horrible coincidence isn’t enough to send you to the trademark office STAT to patent whatever name and idea you’ve got brewing, then nothing will ever seem urgent again.

Yesterday, the world got really upset about Peeple, the “Yelp for people” — an incredibly judgmental and potentially dangerous app that allows you to review anyone and everyone in the world (so long as you have their phone number). But two days ago, Peeple, the “caller ID for your front door,” won a prestigious tech competition in the U.K. In the shortest-lived victory ever, Peeple (the product) soon had its parade epically rained on by the less-than-complimentary media storm surrounding the Peeple app, and now, the Peeple product is at the receiving end of some very confused (and very nasty) messages.

Recommended Videos

@peephome Just close up shop. Everyone pre-hates you except the psycho ex-bf stalker demographic

— Greg Stolze (@GregStolze) October 1, 2015

Let’s explain the difference here: Peeple, the product, is a pretty ingenious little invention. Consisting of a smart camera that sends notifications to your door, the Internet-connected peephole allows its users to see who’s at their door, regardless of whether they’re at home. Whenever someone rings the doorbell, Peeple sends a mobile alert to the resident, keeping owners and renters forever aware of who’s at the front door.

Peeple - Caller ID for your door!

Then, there’s Peeple, the app. If you go on a bad date, you can now give both the restaurant and your failed paramour a one-star review thanks to this human-being-rating system. Once you’re in the Peeple database, there’s no getting off of it, so be careful who you offend.

Naturally, the app hasn’t gotten the warmest of responses (because no one wants to relive high school), but unfortunately, some people’s wrath has been misdirected at the wrong Peeple. Chris Chuter, the CEO of the peephole-app Peeple, told Wired, “We want to be something that people wanted. Not something people … hated. This was supposed to be our moment in the sun. We just won a major competition … then this happened yesterday and completely swallowed up our press. Our branding is in tatters.”

Unfortunately, the issue at hand is that the two companies are actually registered in different countries — the Mean Girls app in Canada, the product in the U.S. There’s nothing that either one can really do about the other at this point, though the likelihood of the Peeple app ever actually launching at this point seems … questionable.

At the end of the day, Chuter says, “We are not changing our name and we’re not going anywhere.” So good branding or not, at least one Peeple is going to weather the storm.

Lulu Chang
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
The Apple Car may be dead, but it became the foundation of Apple Intelligence
A decade of work on a canceled car project reportedly laid the groundwork for Apple Intelligence.
Apple Intelligence in Apple Car

The Apple Car may have never left the garage, but it apparently gave birth to Apple's AI ambitions. According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, Apple's canceled autonomous vehicle project, one that consumed more than a decade of work and over $10 billion before being scrapped in 2024, ended up laying the technological foundation for Apple Intelligence. In a rather ironic twist, one of Apple's most expensive failures may also become one of its most important long-term investments.

The Apple Car forced Apple to think like an AI company

Read more
Researchers hid a prompt injection inside a PNG, and AI fell for it
Hacker

AI coding assistants like Claude are becoming every developer's favorite coworker. They can review code, explain confusing functions, and even write entire features with a single prompt. But new research suggests that this growing trust could also become their biggest weakness.

A team of security researchers (professor Sudipta Chattopadhyay and researcher Murali Ediga) has demonstrated an unusual attack that doesn't target the AI model directly. Instead, it targets what the AI doesn't pay enough attention to during code reviews. Rather than hiding malicious instructions in lines of code, the researchers tucked them inside an image file. Since many AI review tools treat images as decorative assets rather than as something worth inspecting, the pull request can appear perfectly harmless and sail through the review.

Read more
AI has already fallen into the wrong hands and they’re using it to make bombs
Logo, Text

Artificial intelligence has quickly become the go-to tool for everything from writing emails and summarizing meetings to helping students study or developers debug code. But the same technology that saves people time can also be misused, and a new report suggests that terrorist organizations are finding ways to do exactly that.

According to a research paper shared with The New York Times ahead of its publication, researchers found evidence that members of Boko Haram have been using popular AI chatbots to support both day-to-day activities and combat-related tasks. Interviews with 27 former members conducted in Nigeria over the past two years suggest that tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok, Meta AI, and DeepSeek were used to gather technical information, troubleshoot weapons, and even assist with planning attacks.

Read more