Skip to main content

Is 3D printing finally ready for your living room? Not quite yet

3D printing for living room
Image used with permission by copyright holder

This week, dozens of companies will descend upon the Javits Center in New York City for Inside 3D Printing, one of the biggest conferences devoted to the emerging technology. Of course, “emerging” is perhaps a bit of a misnomer for a technology that’s been around in some form or another for 30-plus years. Since the technology was first commercialized in the 80s, it’s found a good amount of success amongst industrial clients in the form of rapid prototyping, which has allowed companies like Boeing and Nike to generate builds of products during the development process.

Printers from companies like MakerBot and 3D Systems let you send models from your smartphone to your printer.

Until fairly recently, however, the technology has been the realm of trash compactor-sized machines with price tags out of the reach of all but the Fortune 500. In the last few years, the home and hobbyist 3D printing space has utterly exploded. MakerBot has mostly served as the ostensible face of the consumer technology, but the Brooklyn-based company is really just the tip of the iceberg. Last year, I attempted to compile a list of all the companies with original consumer-facing 3D printers for sale and came up with 25 or so.

The complaints started flooding in almost immediately from irritating or downright angry companies wondering why I had neglected to include them. I realize this apology is a bit belated, but let me assure you all it wasn’t intentional: From the viewpoint of the casual observer, the industry exploded overnight, and between venture-funded startups and Kickstarter campaigns, there are seemingly new entrants every day.

Nearly all of these companies seem united by the desire to become the brand that truly brings consumer 3D printing into the mainstream. But so far, many 3D printing stories in the mainstream have fixated on science fiction, like the treat of 3D-printed guns. Those aren’t the sort of stories that get people lining up at Best Buy at four in the morning on Black Friday for 3D printers.

MakerBot Replicator
Image used with permission by copyright holder

So, will 3D printing ever become a mainstream technology? Maybe, if it can clear these roadblocks standing in its path from Makerfairs to living rooms.


By now your mom and dad have, at the very least, at least heard about 3D printing. The question is what they know about it. Unless they keep check on gadget blogs and the like, the answer is probably not a lot. And, as mentioned above, what they do know is probably not positive. Those heartwarming stories about 3D-printed prosthetics, sadly, will just never have the 24-hour news network draw of the guy who printed his own gun at home.

Speaking as someone who has written for his share of mainstream news outlets, I can honestly say that this will be a particularly tough nut to crack. Such publications will never devote resources to the technology until it goes mainstream, but without such coverage, a mainstream breakthrough will be extremely difficult. The solution, however, may rise in the spread of 3D printing in education. Remember Apple’s aggressive push to school computer labs? Put 3D printers in the hands of students and you can bet parents will hear about them.


This is a biggie. Again, we turn to Apple’s example. Over the years, the company hasn’t always been the first or even the best to create a product, but the company has a remarkable track record when it comes to making things accessible. In 2014, even the most popular 3D printing companies still have a ways to go on that front – but they’re unquestionably making progress. A few years back, it would have been difficult to conceive of 3D printing an object without some knowledge of 3D modeling CAD software. Flash forward to CES this year and you’ve got multiple printers from companies like MakerBot and 3D Systems, which let you send models from your smartphone to your printer. It’s an extremely impressive leap in a few short years, but there’s still much to be done on the software and hardware front. Until 3D printers become as easy to operate as a microwave oven or TV, mainstream adoption will likely continue to remain elusive. At the current state of development, however, such products seem only a generation or two away.


Companies have also made a great deal of progress on this front in recent years. It’s still a relative rarity, but there are multiple options from companies like Solidoodle and 3D Systems. Interestingly, MakerBot, generally considered the leading light in the push toward mainstream 3D printing, has maintained premium pricing for its latest flagship Replicator. The company has, however, also introduced a cheaper (and decidedly smaller) option in the form the $1,375 Mini. Even that seems like a tough sell for most, at several times the price most paid for their last smartphone.


This will continue to be a tough one. My stock answer to the question of whether people should buy a 3D printer has long been, “If you’re looking for a gadget that will pay for itself, this isn’t it.” I’ve seen some very compelling arguments for 3D printers in home, like the creation of stove knob that’s been long-since discontinued. Neat, sure, but hardly enough to justify the cost of a 3D printer to most — nor is the ability to create original art or prototype products for home businesses. For the vast majority of consumers, there just isn’t a killer application for these products yet.

So, yeah, we’re still a ways off on all of the above counts. But we’re getting there, and pretty quickly, to boot. For evidence, take a look at the Cupcake CNC. That was MakerBot’s first product, released in 2009 as a kit the user needed to assemble his or herself. The company — and the rest of the industry — has made a tremendous amount of progress in the intervening half-decade, no doubt pushed by increasing competition. Any truly mainstream 3D printer will have to address all of the above concerns. Given the amount of progress the industry has made thus far, such a product may not be another five years off.

Editors' Recommendations

Brian Heater
Brian Heater has worked at number of tech pubs, including Engadget, PCMag and Laptop. His writing has appeared in Spin…
3D-printed ventilator valves help out Italian hospital rocked by coronavirus
3d printed ventilator valves img 20200314 223845

What do you do when a crucial part of a lifesaving piece of medical equipment is in hopelessly short supply? You 3D print yourself a supply of them, of course. At least, that’s what happened at a hospital in Brescia, Italy, rocked by the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic.

While ventilator breathing machines are not exactly in abundant supply, medical professionals found that the valves connecting the machine to the patient were even scarcer. This is due to the fact that they have to be regularly swapped out between patients, giving the component a very short life span.

Read more
3D-printing technique produces tiny, highly detailed objects in seconds
The new fast 3D printing technique developed by researchers at EPFL.

The new fast 3D printing technique developed by researchers at EPFL. Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne

3D printing has incredible potential for both research and home uses, but it has some limitations. The current technology takes some time to produce an object, and it produces hard structures only. But now, researchers from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL) have come up with a method for printing highly-precise miniature objects with different textures.

Read more
This 3D-printed four-legged robot is ready to take on Spot — at a lower price
3d printed ghost robotics origin

New Spirit 40: First Steps & Quick Run

Most people reading this will be familiar with four-legged robots such as the dog-inspired Spot robot developed by Boston Dynamics or Swiss robotics company ANYbotics’ ANYmal. But while there’s no doubt that such robots are supremely impressive, they’re also expensive -- which could limit their application in certain domains.

Read more