Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Computing
  4. Web
  5. News

Changing some code on YouTube could help lower its carbon footprint

Add as a preferred source on Google

The idea of saving the planet by changing a bit of code on YouTube sounds, on face value, kind of crazy. But it could actually make a surprising amount of difference to the quantities of carbon dioxide pumped into the atmosphere — and it wouldn’t even involve much of a change to the overall user experience.

According to researchers at the U.K.’s University of Bristol, YouTube videos carry a carbon footprint of around 10 million tons of CO2 equivalent each year. That number, caused by the amount of electric energy used to power the data centers servers which provide YouTube streaming videos to the world, is equivalent to the total carbon footprint of Rhode Island.

Recommended Videos

Stopping YouTube videos altogether would, therefore, be quite a saving to the environment. However, that is unlikely to happen — no matter how much the occasional toxic comments section would have us sometimes wishing it would. Instead, the Bristol researchers behind the study have come up with another solution. By letting users listen to audio tracks on YouTube with an inactive screen, they think that it would be possible to save 100 to 500 thousand tons of CO2 equivalent every single year. At present, this option is available, but only to subscribers of the YouTube Premium service. Another possibility they suggest would stop YouTube from automatically playing videos.

The research is due to be presented this week at the conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems in Glasgow, Scotland.

While tech giants — including Google, which owns YouTube — have certainly made big steps in embracing sustainable energy, it’s not clear whether YouTube would consider a change such as this. Going forward, however, it seems clear that tech companies will need to start developing their systems in a way that pays proper attention to environmental factors. This would be a great, relatively straightforward start.

It’s easy for users to forget that something as intangible as software has real-world environmental impacts. But it absolutely does, and something as innocuous as streaming some YouTube videos or Netflix in the background while you check your emails (which, frankly, almost everyone does) unfortunately represents one part of a much larger problem. Let’s hope research such as this is heeded!

Luke Dormehl
I'm a UK-based tech writer covering Cool Tech at Digital Trends. I've also written for Fast Company, Wired, the Guardian…
Polar is yet another AI browser, but it goes beyond just automating the mundane web chores
Polar wants to turn your browser into an AI-powered productivity tool
Polar AI browser

The AI browser race is entering a new phase. After spending much of 2025 trying to reinvent web search with built-in chatbots, startups are increasingly shifting their attention toward browser agents that can automate repetitive work instead of simply answering questions. The latest company to embrace that transition is Polar, a startup founded by former Perplexity engineer Kevin Zhang, which has raised $5.7 million in seed funding led by Madrona.

Unlike the first generation of AI browsers that targeted everyday consumers, Polar is designed specifically for knowledge workers. Its premise is straightforward: instead of replacing Google Search, the browser aims to eliminate repetitive tasks that professionals perform across dozens of browser tabs every day.

Read more
I use ChatGPT Pro everyday, and these 3 features keep me subscribed
ChatGPT on iPhone

I've used ChatGPT for years, but for the longest time, I never felt the need to pay for it. Instead, I subscribed to Claude Pro because it fit my workflow better. Between regular chat and Cowork, it gave me everything I needed in one place, so paying for another AI subscription didn't make sense.

That changed when OpenAI introduced ChatGPT Work. I was curious enough to give ChatGPT Pro a proper shot, expecting to test one new feature and move on. Instead, I ended up using it far more than I expected. The more I relied on it in my day-to-day work, the more I realized it offered a few things I didn't want to give up. Those are the three features that have kept me happily subscribed ever since.

Read more
The music industry wants AI slop kicked off the charts, and it finally has a plan
Universal, Sony, and Warner are pushing global charts to block AI slop songs.
Spotify music player

I've caught myself bopping along to a new viral quite a few times, only to realize that it was created using artificial intelligence. Turns out the labels are just as fed up with this as I am.

So what exactly are labels asking for?

Read more