Master the front lines of WWI with our ‘Battlefield 1’ PC performance guide

battlefield 1 screenshot

Even though the events of Battlefield 1 are set over one hundred years ago, the vivid recreation can demand a lot of older systems migrating in from Battlefield 4. Luckily, we’ve been running our preview build through the wringer in an effort to find out exactly what settings have the greatest effect on framerate, while still preserving the impressively realistic graphics.

Brass tacks

Before we get into improving your performance, there are a few points to sort out.

First, our test machine is one that will be familiar to those who have read our previous performance guides. It’s powered by an Intel Core i7-6950X which hasn’t been overclocked, to help bring it more in line with average systems, and it’s paired up with 8GB of RAM. This time around, we’re testing on a Zotac GTX 1060 4GB AMP! Edition. We’re also running our tests on a 2,560 x 1,440 Dell display.

You can lower resolution scale, but be warned. Though the gains are high, the effects are detrimental.

There are a few settings we held consistent throughout our benchmarking. Vertical sync was turned off, to ensure the framerates weren’t capped, regardless of quality. We’re also running in DirectX 11 mode, as we think most gamers will.

There’s also the issue of graphical memory, which mostly affects the maximum texture quality, and shouldn’t hold back performance if the textures don’t fill that memory. In our case, 4GB seemed to be more than enough even for the ultra-quality setting. If your card’s performance doesn’t quite match its graphical memory, there’s an option to automatically reduce some settings to keep that from happening. We turned it off so that it wouldn’t interfere with our consistency.

We tested our framerates across the handful of vignettes that make up the introductory mission. That means each reported framerate is averaged from three pieces of that mission – defending on foot, defending from a turret, and manning a tank gun as it progresses across the battlefield.

Scaling works, but there’s a price

Battlefield 1 offers a resolution scale mode, which allows you to tweak the rendered resolution while still running at native resolution for your panel. For the sake of simplicity, we’ve left it at 100 percent, so it’s rendering at native 1440p. If you really need to gain a lot of performance in order for the game to run smoothly, you can lower this scale instead of your resolution, but be warned.

It’s effectively the same for quality as dropping the resolution, so the gains are high, but the effects are detrimental. For example, if you reduce the scale to 50 percent while playing at 1080p resolution, you’ll effectively be rendering at 960 x 540. That, of course, will result in a huge performance gain. But it also will make the game look awful.

If you’re on a very old machine, or on integrated graphics, the resolution scale feature may let you run the game at an acceptable framerate when you otherwise couldn’t. But you should seriously consider a hardware upgrade.

The presets make a big difference

Like most games, Battlefield 1 packs in four preconfigured graphical modes — low, medium, high, and ultra. It’s not clear from our initial testing whether these presets apply settings that are hidden from the user, but in order to change individual settings, you have to use the “Custom” preset. That would indicate that even if there are more changes than visible baked into these presets, you can’t leverage them.

As you can see, the difference between the preset graphics options is stark. The most noticeable difference comes from the anti-aliasing at the edges of flat lines and sharp cornered objects, both things Battlefield 1 has no shortage of. At low, users are likely to notice this as “jaggies” which appear to turn smooth edges into rough staircases. The game uses TAA for both the high and ultra presets, so you won’t notice much of a difference between the two when it comes to anti-aliasing.

There are a number of other noticeable compromises when playing at lower presets. Shadows tend to be a lot fuzzier, regardless of their source, which we discuss in more detail below.

The only issue with the presets is that the price/performance ratio is awkward in the middle. There’s only a nominal ten percent framerate boost by moving from ultra to high settings, but a more substantial 30 percent increase from dropping the settings from high to medium.

Unfortunately, that framerate boost comes along with a noticeable hit to quality.


At medium, there are structural changes to objects and scenery, resulting in a drop in detail that’s very obvious even at first glance. The lower effect and processing settings also result in a chalky look on player and vehicle models. Your best bet, if you fall on this cusp, is to change to a custom setup, with mostly high settings, and use some of the individual values below to tweak performance.

Post processing

Apart from dropping the resolution scale, there are a few settings that will help slide your system into more playable framerates. Post processing is the most effective single setting in that respect, and its effect on the game isn’t as noticeable as you might think.

The images above show the marginal benefits of a higher post processing setting. You’ll mostly see it in the polishing touches that add to realism. Smoke looks fuller and murkier, and lighting effects appear to extend a bit further into the distance. Little details that aren’t immediately in front of the player also have more depth to them.

Basically, there’s a reason we suggest cutting this setting first. It provided almost a 14 percent increase in framerates by moving from Ultra to Low, and in the heat of battle, you won’t notice the little details as distinctly anyway.

Lighting Quality

We’re starting to get into the weeds a little here, but if you’re still trying to crank the most performance out of your system, lighting quality is the next most effective path.

Lighting quality has a very noticeable effect on the game’s visual fidelity. At lower settings, shadows and bright spots are fuzzy and flat, regardless of where the light is reflecting. At ultra, hard edges leave sharp shadows, and bright flashes of light, like fire effects, are all much more realistic, taking cues from their surroundings.

The frame rate jump isn’t as distinct. There’s just over a ten percent difference in average frame rate between ultra and low. You’re going to notice the difference if you choose to lower this settings, but even so, the big performance boost may be worthwhile.

Other settings

We didn’t see substantial gains from dropping other individual settings. That is not to say they don’t make a difference, but you will probably need to drop the detail of several settings simultaneously to further move the dial.

The long war

If there’s one thing that’s abundantly clear from our testing, it’s that the game’s developer, DICE, has really figured out how to optimize its games well after several years of Battlefield titles. Anyone with a current generation GPU shouldn’t have any issues running the game at 1080p, and even 1440p, depending on the card. Our GTX 1060 sits right at 70 frames per second with the settings on ultra, on a 2,560 x 1,440 monitor.

For those who can’t quite make that, you’ll be glad to know there are plenty of options for reaching smooth framerates without tanking the quality. The high preset, with compromises in post-processing and anti-aliasing, can easily result in 20 percent performance gains over ultra, with minimal decrease in detail. It’s worth noting that turning down anti-aliasing on its own won’t result in improved performance. However, if you reduce it with other settings, you’ll find it’s more effective.

Even on the high preset, Battlefield 1 is a very attractive game with a distinct art style, and one that’s likely to impress even veteran Battlefield enthusiasts. The fact that more systems will be able to run it is just icing on the cake.

Product Review

Acer Predator Triton 500 review

Nvidia’s new RTX 2080 Max-Q is the fastest GPU you’ll find in any laptop, but it usually comes at a steep price. Acer’s Predator Triton 500, starting at $2,500, makes it a little more affordable. But what must you sacrifice in the…

Which midrange Nvidia Turing graphics card should you buy?

Nvidia's top midrange cards are all solid performers, but which offers the best bang for buck? To find out where you should spend your money on your next big upgrade, we pitted the GTX 1660 vs. GTX 1660 Ti vs. RTX 2060.

How the Google Stadia could lead to a new era of multi-GPU gaming

Google's Stadia could use more than one graphics card to deliver the high-performance visuals it's promised. If that leads to better developer support for multi-GPUs, could that mean gaming with two or more graphics cards could finally be…

G-Sync and FreeSync can make your games look better, but which is best?

There are some subtle differences between the two adaptive refresh technology offerings, and they affect cost, performance, and compatibility. Nvidia may have released it's feature first, but in recent years AMD has stepped up to the plate…
Product Review

Nintendo’s Labo VR Kit may look silly, but it really works

During our hands-on with the Nintendo Labo VR Kit, fears of a gimmicky product from Nintendo were quickly dispelled. While not a direct competitor to Oculus or HTCs own headsets, Labo VR brings a clever, new way to experience VR that makes…

PlayStation does the smart thing, stops selling digital codes at physical stores

Sony will no longer offer PlayStation digital full-game downloads at retail stores. The game downloads will now only be available directly from the PlayStation Network's own digital store.

Seven years later, ‘Dark Souls’ is still a gloriously punishing masterpiece

Despite my experience and love of From Software’s Dark Souls III and Bloodborne, I never played the original Dark Souls. The new remastered version gave me a chance to remedy that, and it was glorious.

Atlus reveals Persona 5 The Royal, teases mysterious new female character

Atlus revealed Persona 5 The Royal in a trailer that features a mysterious new female character. It appears that the redhead will be an antagonist to the Phantom Thieves of Hearts, but many details about the upcoming game remain unclear.

Save big on Corsair gaming headsets and a premium keyboard

From March 24 to 30, you can pick up one of two models of the great Corsair's Void Pro gaming headset on a sweet discount. One of Corsair's best mechanical keyboards is also on sale this week -- at a steep discount.
Emerging Tech

Awesome Tech You Can’t Buy Yet: Robotic companions and computer-aided karaoke

Check out our roundup of the best new crowdfunding projects and product announcements that hit the web this week. You may not be able to buy this stuff yet, but it's fun to gawk!

Blizzard says Overwatch endorsement system helped slash toxicity by 40 percent

Blizzard said that toxicity in Overwatch is down 40 percent, partly thanks to the addition of the endorsement system. The feature allows players to reward teammates and opponents who show good behavior during a match.

Mortal Kombat 11 to add Shang Tsung, in likeness of 1995 movie actor, as DLC

Mortal Kombat 11 will add Shang Tsung as its first DLC character, and he will be in the likeness of and be voiced by the actor who played him in the 1995 movie based on the series. Noob Saibot was also revealed as a part of the roster.

Final Fantasy XIV: Shadowbringers to add Dancers and the Hrothgar

Final Fantasy XIV: Shadowbringers will add a second set of new jobs and races to the MMORPG, namely Dancers and the Hrothgar. The Dancers use throwing weapons and can buff teammates, while the Hrothgar are a male-only, leonin race.

Sony to launch State of Play videos for PlayStation 4, PlayStation VR

Sony will debut a new video program named State of Play on March 25. The first episode will focus on new PlayStation 4 and PlayStation VR games, and it remains to be seen if Sony will tease the PlayStation 5.