Skip to main content

Blizzard Activision execs subpoenaed by SEC over handling of abuse allegations

A report from the Washington Post has revealed that Activision Blizzard’s woes stemming from a lawsuit filed against the company by the State of California are far from over. According to the report, the company is currently the focus of an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over its handling of sexual misconduct and abuse allegations. The investigation has led to Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick, along with other high-ranking executives at the company, being subpoenaed.

According to the report, the SEC’s focus is on finding out whether Activision Blizzard shared information about accusations of workplace discrimination and sexual harassment with “investors and other parties.” To that end, the SEC has requested a vast number of documents from the company, including personnel files, separation agreements, meeting minutes reaching back to 2019, and Kotick’s communications with other executives regarding sexual harassment complaints at the company.

The SEC’s involvement, asan arm of the federal government, significantly steps up the pressure being put on the Call of Duty and World of Warcraft publisher since a lawsuit was filed against it by the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing in July. The suit alleges that women at the company were sexually harassed and regularly paid less than their male counterparts, most commonly at Blizzard Entertainment. Since the lawsuit, employees at Blizzard have walked out and the company’s president, J. Allen Brack, has stepped down.

Activision Blizzard’s immediate response to the SEC has been civil, with a representative for the company saying that it “is cooperating with the SEC.” Activision Blizzard’s first response to the California lawsuit was nearly the opposite, with the company saying that it included “distorted” information. However, Kotick walked those comments back soon after, saying they were “tone-deaf.”

Editors' Recommendations

Otto Kratky
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Otto Kratky is a freelance writer with many homes. You can find his work at Digital Trends, GameSpot, and Gamepur. If he's…
U.K. wants Call of Duty removed from Microsoft’s Activision acquisition
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2.

Microsoft has hit a major roadblock in its attempt to acquire Activision Blizzard, as the UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has determined that the deal "could harm U.K. gamers." For the deal to go through, the CWA is suggesting some major concessions, like Activision Blizzard divesting in the Call of Duty or Activision segments of its business ahead of the acquisition.
A notice of possible remedies document asks Activision Blizzard to do one of the following three things if it doesn't want the acquisition to be potentially prohibited. 

"Divestiture of the business associated with Call of Duty."
"Divestiture of the Activision segment of Activision Blizzard, Inc., which would include the business associated with Call of Duty."
"Divestiture of the Activision segment and the Blizzard segment of Activision Blizzard Inc., which would include the business associated with Call of Duty and World of Warcraft, among other titles."

Read more
FTC files lawsuit to block Microsoft’s Activision Blizzard acquisition
Lilith appears in a Church in Diablo 4.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) will sue Microsoft to block its acquisition of Call of Duty and World of Warcraft publisher Activision Blizzard.
A 3-to-1 vote ultimately determined the FTC's decision to issue the lawsuit as the commission fears that the deal would give Microsoft an unfair advantage in the gaming industry and hurt innovation. FTC Bureau of Competition Director Holly Vedova explained the FTC's intent in a press release.
"Microsoft has already shown that it can and will withhold content from its gaming rivals," she said. "Today, we seek to stop Microsoft from gaining control over a leading independent game studio and using it to harm competition in multiple dynamic and fast-growing gaming markets."
That press release also highlights the FTC's belief that Microsoft's acquisition of ZeniMax Media is problematic due to a track record of "using valuable gaming content to suppress competition from rival consoles." In addition, after the Activision Blizzard acquisition, Microsoft could potentially "harm competition by manipulating Activision’s pricing, degrading Activision’s game quality or player experience on rival consoles and gaming services, changing the terms and timing of access to Activision’s content, or withholding content from competitors entirely."
This $69 billion acquisition has dominated gaming industry headlines all year as Microsoft has been doing all it can to make the deal seem favorable to the industry. As recently as December 6, Head of Xbox Phil Spencer emphasized the potential positives of this acquisition, confirming plans to continue to bring Call of Duty to Nintendo platforms and Steam for 10 years if the Activision Blizzard merger is complete.
By filing this complaint, the FTC begins proceedings that will result in a hearing and trial before an administrative law judge to determine whether or not Microsoft will acquire Activision Blizzard. 

Read more
Microsoft’s Activision Blizzard acquisition just hit another hurdle in the U.K.
Phil Spencer standing in front of a Microsoft Studios logo.

Microsoft's nearly $70 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard is under review internationally, and no country takes this matter more seriously than the United Kingdom. The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) completed the first phase of its investigation into the deal and is now recommending putting it through a second phase.

The call for extra scrutiny into the deal between Microsoft and Activision Blizzard stems from the CMA's concern that such a deal may substantially stifle competition in the U.K.'s gaming market. Specifically, it's worried that if and when the merger goes through, Microsoft may make Activision Blizzard's portfolio of games exclusive to Xbox consoles, or make them available on PlayStation and Nintendo systems "on worse terms." It's also concerned that the company may leverage Activision Blizzard's games across console, PC, and cloud systems to harm competition in the growing cloud gaming space.

Read more