Skip to main content

‘Fortnite’ will launch on disk before entering its early-access period

fortnite physical release early access
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Update: Added comment from Epic Games.

Earlier in June, Epic Games confirmed Fortnite was due to launch this summer, putting an end to speculation that the project had been quietly shelved. Now, retailer listings have offered some more information about the title’s retail release, which is being brought about in conjunction with Gearbox Software and Koch Media.

The retail version of Fortnite is due to release on July 21 in Europe, four days ahead of its digital debut, according to a report from Gamespot. A listing on the Gamestop online store suggests that the same scheduling will be in effect for its launch in North America.

This is quite unusual, as Fortnite is part of Epic Games’ ongoing free-to-play initiative. This means that if players are willing to wait a while, they would be able to try out the game without parting with their cash — although, of course, they would be subject to some of the standard limitations that are associated with this business model.

The retail version of Fortnite gives players access to the Founder’s Pack, which grants access to the game on July 21, as well as some other in-game bonuses. Digital copies of the game grant entry to what is being billed as a paid early-access period, which begins on July 25, but anyone who pre-orders digitally can also start playing on July 21. Epic Games previously confirmed that the game will go free-to-play sometime in 2018.

“We are offering our Deluxe Edition Founder’s Pack, which costs $60, at both digital and retail stores because we know some people like to purchase their games physically,” executive producer Zak Phelps told Digital Trends. “They both get the same benefits and exclusive items only available in Founder’s Packs. Aside from Early Access to Fortnite and special in-game events this year, we’ve jammed tons of items, Heroes and loot pinatas (our loot crates) into every Founder’s Pack.”

Early access can be a thorny issue among gaming circles and as a result, Fortnite looks set to cause some controversy. The base edition of the game is priced at $40, while the physical version costs $60, which is not exactly cheap for an unproven early-access title that will go free-to-play within the next 18 months.

Of course, it is likely that Epic Games will give early adopters some kind of reward once the game transitions to a free-to-play format. However, it is easy to look at this move as a cash-grab intended to fund the final stages of the long-gestating project’s development, given that it was first unveiled in 2011.

Fortnite could still turn out to be an engrossing multiplayer experience but there are some major questions lingering about its early-access release.

Editors' Recommendations

Brad Jones
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Brad is an English-born writer currently splitting his time between Edinburgh and Pennsylvania. You can find him on Twitter…
Inside the long, emotional journey of an early access hit
A giant tree hangs in fog in Rogue Legacy 2.

Less than halfway into 2022, it’s already clear that this year is going down in gaming’s history books -- Elden Ring’s jaw-dropping success alone set that in stone. Though giant blockbusters have been the focal point of conversation this year, most of this year’s most impressive projects are much smaller in scale. It has quietly been a tremendous year for indie games exiting early access.

A concept that has become more popular over the past decade, the early access approach allows developers to release games well before they’re in a finished 1.0 state. That gives fans a chance to playtest games early and provide feedback to creators, having a direct impact on development. The strategy famously paid off for Hades in 2020, creating the decade’s first instant classic. Two years later, the approach continues to pay off for developers who are willing to let communities into their creative process.

Read more
The best early-access games
Creatures battle in Temtem

Most of the time, playing an unfinished game is cause for outrage. There have been plenty of examples where games have shipped in what some gamers called an "unfinished" state. The best-case scenario is that the developers continue working on the game to improve it, but at that point, the damage is already done. On the other hand, if given the opportunity to willingly buy a game before it is finished, gamers are almost always excited to get their hands on it.

Early-access games are one of the most powerful new tools modern games can utilize. It allows smaller development teams to get funding for their games before launching them, accumulate useful player data and feedback, and learn to make changes on the fly. For players, they get to see some experimental new games that probably wouldn't otherwise exist and be a part of the development in a small way. Some of the best games of all time have come from an early-access model, so we've gathered up some of the best games currently in early access that just might be, or already are, the next massive hit.

Read more
Charging players to access a game early is a dirty tactic
A World War 2 plane flies over Battlefield 2042's robots.

Gamers and the gaming industry are in a perpetual battle. The industry wants to make as much money off of players as it can, and players want as much high-quality content for as little money as possible. Every now and then, a publisher will test out some new way to make money, perhaps with DLC, paid cosmetics, or dreaded loot boxes. Generally, those moves are met with outrage -- but not always.

One monetization attempt that we have been quick to slap down is anything that is seen as "pay-to-win." Players can deal with paid cosmetics and DLC content, but the second there's a whiff in the air that a game is selling some sort of advantage -- it's blood in the water. That's why I find it so strange that a trend is coming back and, for whatever reason, it isn't being lambasted as it was in the past. That would be requiring players to pay for early access to games.
Lame marketing ploy

Read more