Skip to main content

U.K. government won’t ban loot boxes, but urges the games industry to police itself

The U.K.’s Department of Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport (DCMS) has announced that it will not enact any laws regarding loot boxes, which are common in mobile games and some console games. Instead, it’s calling on the video game industry to regulate loot boxes themselves after releasing its report containing the results of its investigation into the predatory gaming element on Sunday.

Two years ago, the DCMS launched a call for evidence into the effects loot boxes may cause on children and teens, as well as their impact on mental health, finances, and online gambling. The investigation elicited 32,000 responses to a player survey and 50 submissions from game companies, researchers and third-party organizations, as well as an independent rapid evidence assessment by the Innovation for Games and Media Enterprise (InGame), which was commissioned by the DCMS.

The investigation found a link between loot boxes and harm, saying that players who purchase loot boxes will experience mental health, financial and gambling problems. It noted that the risk of those issues are higher in children and teens, especially since they have a tendency to purchase loot boxes without parental consent.

However, even though the report found a link between the loot boxes and harm, it couldn’t find a causative link. Because correlation does not equal causation, the report stated that further research is needed in order to determine “which implementations of loot boxes and broader monetization strategies may be particularly problematic.”

Even so, the U.K. government shared the sentiment that children and teens shouldn’t purchase loot boxes without their parents’ permission and that the games industry should work to make them unavailable to players in that age group unless a parent approves them. Some game companies have already taken measures to implement policies that prevent players under 18 from making unauthorized purchases of loot boxes and other transactions in their games. For example, Pokemon Cafe Mix reminds kids to get their parents’ permission to buy power-ups every time they boot up the game. The ESRB even placed the “In-Game Purchases (Includes Random Items)” label on their ratings on titles that contain loot boxes, such as the FIFA series, Fortnite, and Overwatch.

Editors' Recommendations

Cristina Alexander
Cristina Alexander has been writing since 2014, from opining about pop culture on her personal blog in college to reporting…
‘Ghost Recon Wildlands’ adds loot boxes, but they won’t affect gameplay
Ghost Recon Wildlands review

Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands has undergone some pretty major changes since it originally launched nearly a year ago, with new content expansions and a few competitive multiplayer updates. As with many AAA games recently, Ubisoft is now jumping on the loot box bandwagon, but the company promises that players won't deal with a Star Wars: Battlefront II situation.

In the Ghost Recon Wildlands Extended Ops update, which will arrive by the end of January to all platforms, the game will introduce "Battle Crates." These are boxes containing cosmetic items that are usable in both the campaign and the competitive Ghost War mode.

Read more
Game publisher Take-Two doesn’t think that loot boxes are gambling

Loot boxes in video games have been a contentious topic over the last few months, as more and more titles relegate progression systems and rewards to what is essentially a randomized form of gambling -- but if you were to ask Grand Theft Auto V and NBA 2K18 publisher Take-Two about loot boxes, it would have a different definition of gambling.

Speaking at a Credit Suisse event (via GameSpot), Take-Two president Karl Slatoff said that the company "[doesn't] view [loot boxes] as gambling," echoing statements made by the Entertainment Software Board.

Read more
Do players really like loot boxes, or are game publishers forcing them on us?
loot boxes star wars batllefront ii

Electronic Arts has brought the long-simmering debate over the potentially exploitative nature of loot boxes to a boil. Fans found the grind to unlock items and characters in Star Wars Battlefront II so egregious (nearly 40 hours of regular play for a single character) that they gave EA’s response to the controversy on Reddit the dubious honor of most downvoted post in the platform’s history. Developer DICE has already backpedaled, reducing character unlock costs by 75% and tweaking the item drop system, but, to an extent the damage is already done; EA has made its priorities clear.

It’s good that players are voicing concerns now, because this is only the beginning. Take-Two (parent company of 2K and Rockstar Games) reported the other week that microtransactions (e.g. buying in-game items, virtual currency, and DLC) comprised 42% of its most recent quarterly revenue (“It’s been transformative,” said CEO Strauss Zelnick), and that the company intended to henceforth focus on exclusively publishing games with “recurrent consumer spending hooks.” For Ubisoft, the publisher behind Far Cry, Assassin’s Creed, and many others, the figure was 51%. What happens when microtransactions transition from a supplementary revenue stream to being the main business model? That reality has arrived.

Read more