Skip to main content

Is Destiny 2: The Witch Queen a good intro for newbies?

Destiny 2 is an extremely dense game. Before today, I’d played it for around 15 hours and already had that message imprinted deep in my brain. There’s a ridiculous amount of content in this game, so many locations to visit and nonplayable characters to talk to. For a new player, it’s all overwhelming. It’s why I struggled to start playing the game to begin with. It floods you with so many icons and pop-ups that you’ll immediately want a simpler experience.

Destiny 2: The Witch Queen - Launch Trailer

But I decided to try Destiny 2 again just for its latest expansionThe Witch Queen. If you’ve been paying attention to fans of the game, Witch Queen is already the best thing since sliced bread. For what it’s worth, they’re kind of right! I don’t have the same fervor as fans of the game, who know who Savathun is, why she matters, and what’s happening in the story. Still, it’s fun to run around in her Throne World, shoot Light-powered enemies, and get new weapons, especially with friends.

At the same time, Destiny 2‘s Witch Queen expansion isn’t made for new players, especially those who don’t know the overall gameplay loop too well. Offering nothing in terms of a story explainer, Witch Queen throws players into the deep end immediately, assuming they know everything about the game from the get-go. For a new player, it’s about as bad an introduction as you can get.

A wall of features

So far, I’ve played around three hours of Witch Queen, which in the grand scheme of things isn’t a whole lot. But in that time, I, along with one of my housemates who is extremely into Destiny 2, have completed a number of the expansion’s main missions, taken part in some open-world activities, and earned a fair bit of loot.

My takeaway from all of that is that Destiny 2 is a fun game, as long as you spend a bit of cash. Witch Queen itself is $40, and that doesn’t include its season pass, so toss another $10 on top of that. For $50, I made Destiny 2 into an enjoyable experience. Witch Queen actually made it feel like there was something to do in the game, which is probably how anyone who’s ever bought an expansion for the game has felt.

Savathun telepors a player in Destiny 2.

For $50, I also got access to even more systems inside of Destiny 2, and that’s where things take a sharp turn. I, again, don’t know much about Destiny 2. The game’s flood of NPCs, vendors, and systems scared me off more than once, and are why I never got into it properly any other time I’ve tried it. This time around I was already in the hole for $50, so I had to at least get something out of the experience.

But Witch Queen only adds more of what drove me off every other time I played Destiny 2. While playing I kept getting more resources used for upgrading weapons, and eventually was pointed to a new mechanic that lets players make their own weapons. While the process for creating a weapon was explained, it wasn’t done clearly.

At this point, I’d rather take a step-by-step PowerPoint presentation detailing the process that treats me like a fool rather than one that assumes I’m used to Destiny’s way of doing things.

When it comes to Destiny 2, new players are fools. The game is an ocean at this point, and jumping into it is like going swimming without ever having seen a puddle. The only thing Witch Queen has done is make that ocean even deeper. I’m enjoying Destiny 2 now, finally, but as a new player, it can be hard to like. Shooting aliens, getting new gear, that’s all stuff that I know already, sure. It’s everything in-between that remains as mysterious as Savathun’s intentions.

Destiny 2: The Witch Queen is available now on PC, PS4, PS5, Xbox One, and Xbox Series X/S.

Editors' Recommendations

Otto Kratky
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Otto Kratky is a freelance writer with many homes. You can find his work at Digital Trends, GameSpot, and Gamepur. If he's…
Here’s why PlatinumGames and Sony are all-in on live service
Warriors look toward a beautiful sunrise and enemies in Babylon's Fall.

PlatinumGames President Atsushi Inaba turned heads in a recent interview when he indicated that the beloved Japanese developer would move away from the kind of single-player games it is known for. While PlatinumGames made a name for itself with linear, single-player action titles like Bayonetta and Nier: Automata, Inaba believes the company should make more titles that players can enjoy for long periods of time.
"When it comes to future game production, we want to focus on creating games that are different from the past," he told Famitsu (VGC translated the comments). "I would like to focus on creating games that can be enjoyed and loved for a longer period of time ... Considering the changes in the market over the next five years or so, I think it is absolutely necessary for us to do this."
Some fans fear this means PlatinumGames is about to embrace the live service segment of the video game market. This is worrying to some as Babylon's Fall, the first game of this kind for PlatinumGames, is shaping up to be a disappointing endeavor. Meanwhile, the single-player Bayonetta 3 looks like the kind of fast fun fans come to expect from the studio. 
PlatinumGames isn't the only studio chasing the live service dream. Sony is doubling down even more. After acquiring Destiny developer Bungie, Sony Chief Financial Officetr Hiroki Totoki revealed that PlayStation Studios plans to release 10 live service games by March 2026.
Games like this are controversial because they're monetized, and they vary vary in quality. You either end up a great success like Final Fantasy XIV or become an expensive failure like Anthem and Marvel's Avengers. So why are so many companies still pivoting to this model after high-profile disasters and disdain from hardcore gamers?
It pays to win
The answer is more straightforward than one might think. In reality, it comes down to what makes money. Yes, single-player games can still be successful and perform well for companies, but data from analysts highlights how much the DLC, microtransactions, and subscription elements of live service games make. Mat Piscatella, NPD Group executive director and video game industry adviser, explained this on Twitter, noting that 60% of non-mobile game content spending comes from DLC, microtransactions, and subscriptions.
https://twitter.com/MatPiscatella/status/1490711392449486851
It's not surprising that PlatinumGames executives see that the studio is leaving money on the table by not developing games that engage players like that. Bayonetta 3 could sell millions of copies when it launches later this year, but live service games could sell the same amount and then continue to make money years after launch.
Multiple analysts have recognized this trend too. Niko Partners senior analyst Daniel Ahmad tweeted a chart revealing that Sony made more from add-ons, microtransaction, and DLC content than digital and physical game sales combined. 
https://twitter.com/ZhugeEX/status/1490714400000512005
To stay appealing to investors and keep the business afloat, companies will go where the money is. This approach, unfortunately, can have some harmful side effects. We've seen it happen more recently with NFTs, but there's a history of live service games gone wrong as well. High-profile live service games like Anthem and Marvel's Avengers have failed because they got bogged down in nickel-and-diming players or did not ensure the quality of gameplay increased with the length. If your game isn't fun, no one's going to want to spend hundreds of hours in it just because they can eventually unlock some cool-looking things.
Babylon's Fall currently seems like it may not do well, so PlatinumGames needs to focus on quality if it continues to go down this path. 
Quality over quantity 
DLC and microtransactions do have a bad rap around the video game industry for a good reason. When companies merely focus on player engagement and sales data, they often forget to make games that players will enjoy. The best approach for Sony and PlatinumGames is to make sure the gameplay, story, and worlds are a lot of fun before they stretch the experience to last a long time. It also seems likely that neither PlatinumGames nor Sony should completely abandon the types of games they are known for.
In the same interview with Famitsu, Inaba states that PlatinumGames "would like to cherish and create small but brilliantly conceived games such as Sol Cresta, and games in which you can enjoy the process of clearing the game by going through one-off, well-designed stages, such as Bayonetta." Inaba also wants the games to feel like what the studio is known for, saying, "I want to lead PlatinumGames in a direction that is pure and unadulterated."
While Babylon's Fall makes this trend look worrying, we don't know if that's the only way PlatinumGames plans to create games that players engage with for a long time. PlatinumGames must learn from the shortcomings of Babylon's Fall and improve if it doesn't want to release a string of live service flops. 
Meanwhile, live service will be just one part of Sony's first-party game strategy in the future. While the Bungie acquisition may allow the company to make more live service games, plenty of single-player PS5 exclusives like Horizon Forbidden West, God of War: Ragnarok, and Marvel's Spider-Man 2 are still on the way. Sony also intentionally acquired Bungie because of its live service experience with games like Destiny 2, so it wants to approach that kind of game correctly. 
We've seen plenty of companies get the live service model wrong as it's a high-risk, high-reward market. To stay relevant, PlatinumGames and Sony might have to embrace forever games more than their fans may prefer. Still, if making great, fun games remains a priority, these companies shouldn't go off the rails anytime soon. They'll just make more money while doing it. 

Read more
Google Stream is what Stadia should have been from the start
Google Pixel phone held by a Stadia controller grip.

One year after Google shuttered the internal game development studio for its struggling cloud gaming service Google Stadia, a report from Business Insider gives a clear idea of what's next for the tech giant's gaming efforts. It's reportedly moving away from making a cloud gaming platform where subscribers buy and play games. Instead, Google will use the technology in partnerships with major third-party companies under the moniker Google Stream.

As someone who has actively played Stadia since its November 2019 launch, the slow downfall of the platform has been painful. Still, Google executives never had their heart in Stadia's potential as a commercial platform. Google Stream is what Stadia should've been from the start if Google wasn't going to commit to gaming fully and, hopefully, it will play a part in cloud gaming's bright future.
From Stadia to Stream
In retrospect, this endpoint for Google Stadia was inevitable. According to Business Insider, Google is pitching Google Stream to businesses as a backend cloud gaming technology that doesn't necessarily need to be tied to the Stadia storefront. It already partnered with the exercise company Peleton and AT&T last year on different projects. Instead of putting effort into getting more exclusives or AAA games on Stadia, it's getting more companies to white-label Google Stream. (That's where a product or service produced by one company is rebranded by other companies to make it appear as if they had made it.)

Read more
Here’s what Sony’s Bungie deal means for Destiny
Guardians from Destiny 2

Sony is in the process of acquiring Bungie, and while that's a pretty big deal for the games industry, anyone who doesn't play Bungie's games may not have much of a reason to care. For Destiny players though, the acquisition throws the franchise's entire future into the air. Previous acquisitions, like Microsoft's purchase of ZeniMax Media, have led to franchises that used to be cross-platform becoming platform exclusives.

So, what does Bungie's acquisition mean for the Destiny franchise and the game's fans? Let's break it down.
Is the Destiny franchise moving off Xbox?
Executives from both sides of this deal -- Sony Interactive Entertainment CEO Jim Ryan and Bungie CEO Pete Parsons -- have stated that the Destiny games won't suddenly become PlayStation exclusives.

Read more