Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Gaming
  3. Features

Don’t be a Wordle Scrooge: Learn to love Twitter’s new favorite game

Giovanni Colantonio
By

Even if you haven’t played it, you probably know what Wordle is at this point. The simple word game has gotten some high-profile attention from publications like the New York Times. But beyond that, the game itself is its own marketing campaign. Has your Twitter feed been inexplicably filled with colored boxes over the last few weeks? That’s Wordle.

Wordle is a browser-based puzzle game that’s easy to play and mercifully not time consuming. The goal is to guess a daily five-letter word with no hints or clues. When a player types a word, different colors will indicate if they’ve gotten some letters right. Green indicates a correct letter in the right spot, yellow shows that the letter is right but the placement is wrong, while gray indicates that the letter isn’t in the word. Players have six tries to get it right. The only prize for completing it is the option to copy and paste the results, hence the Twitter takeover.

The rules for Wordle displayed on its website.

Haters emerge

A lot of players love Wordle, but as is the case with any popular social trend, it’s gained its fair share of naysayers as well. Chatting about the game with a friend recently, he told me that someone he knew was so annoyed about the trend that she began tweeting the answer every day — going as far as to pay money to promote some tweets.

Recommended Videos

“Things I hate in 2022…..liars, cheaters & your wordle twitter posts,” one cynical tweet reads.

Social backlash cycles are predictable, but it’s one I can sympathize with. After all, no one likes feeling left out. The abstract tweets don’t exactly explain what’s going on — not to mention that they present a potential nightmare for those who use screen readers. It’s easy to see the origin story for Wordle Scrooges.

For those who find themselves annoyed at the influx of boxes in their feed, here’s a tip: It’s much easier to join the party than it is to hiss at it.

The joy of Wordle is that it’s easy to pick up. As long as you know some five-letter words, you know how to play. It’s a free browser game, so there’s no price of admission, and the one puzzle a day limit means that you can’t get addicted to it even if you wanted to. Out of any game that’s become a social phenomenon, Wordle is the most user-friendly one out there.

Am on the Wordle train, but vow to only post my W's in the dead of night.

⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟨🟨🟩⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

— Giovanni Colantonio (@MarioPrime) December 30, 2021

Enjoy a simple pleasure

But it’s not even the game itself that makes it special. Wordle has become one of those social watercooler titles that’s able to connect strangers. It’s a phenomenon we’ve seen with games like Pokémon Go and Animal Crossing: New Horizons over the years. There’s a collective joy attached to it, which is why players seem so eager to share their resultson Twitter, despite it being a totally voluntary feature. When a Wordle player sees a result tweet in the wild, it’s like when a dog spots another dog.

It’s been difficult to really feel part of a social community over the past two years. Digital communication can feel impersonal and gaming has its limits. Even though Animal Crossing: New Horizons was a huge trend, it still required players to own a Nintendo Switch – no small task amid supply chain woes. Companies like Meta have tried to capitalize on our despair by thrusting us into a VR-powered metaverse, but it’s hard to shake the feeling that the company wants our money more than our happiness.

There are no such strings attached with Wordle. It’s a simple pleasure that’ll only take a few minutes out of your day. Once you’re in the loop, all those yellow and green squares on Twitter will start to feel much less annoying. They’re signifiers that friends, loved ones, and total strangers are all sharing the exact same experience as you. It’s a virtual high-five between players who’ve found a harmless way to kill time.

If that doesn’t warm your heart, just update your muted words list and let everyone have their fun.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Giovanni Colantonio
Giovanni Colantonio
Section Editor, Gaming
Giovanni is a writer and video producer focusing on happenings in the video game industry. He has contributed stories to…
Don’t expect Zelda’s $70 price to become the new Switch standard, says Nintendo
Link looks at his hand in The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom.

The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom will be Nintendo's first Switch game to be priced at $70. News that Tears of the Kingdom, a sequel to one of the bestselling and most critically acclaimed titles on the system, will have an increased price compared to its predecessor came as a surprise over three-and-a-half years after its announcement. It also raised questions about what the future of pricing for Nintendo games will be, especially as Sony, Microsoft, and third-party publishers all upped the cost of their new games in recent years. 
While Nintendo will release Tears of Kingdom at $70, a spokesperson for the company tells Digital Trends that this will not always be the case for its first-party games going forward. 
"No," the spokesperson said when Digital Trends asked if this is a new standard. "We determine the suggested retail price for any Nintendo product on a case-by-case basis." 
The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom – Official Trailer #2
To get more insight into the price shift, I spoke to Omdia Principal Analyst George Jijiashvili, who explains what has caused the price of games to go up in recent years and how Tears of the Kingdom demonstrates that Nintendo will "remain flexible about first-party title pricing." Ultimately, Nintendo fans are finally starting to feel the impact of inflation that's been sweeping across the game industry, even if it's only "on a case-by-case basis" for now.
The price is right
Nintendo claims that not every one of its significant first-party game will be $70, and we can actually already see that in action. Preorders just went live for Pikmin 4, which launches on July 21, after Tears of the Kingdom, and it only costs $60. Still, Zelda's price tag indicates that going forward, Nintendo will at least consider raising the price of its most anticipated games to $70. But why start with Tears of the Kingdom?  
When asked why it chose Tears of the Kingdom as its first $70 Nintendo Switch game, a Nintendo spokesperson simply reiterated that the company will "determine the suggested retail price for any Nintendo product on a case-by-case basis." Still, it's a surprising choice for Nintendo to make that pricing change to just one exclusive game almost six years into the Switch's life span. Jijiashvili thinks the choice to do this with Tears of the Kingdom was a pretty apparent one for Nintendo, although it won't apply to everything going forward.
"If you are going to make a game $70, it's going to be the follow-up to one of your most critically acclaimed and bestselling games ever," Jijiashvili tells Digital Trends. "I don’t think that this means that $70 will become the standard price for all major Nintendo releases. It's worth noting that Metroid Prime Remastered is priced at $40. It's clear that Nintendo will remain flexible about first-party title pricing."

It makes basic financial sense for Nintendo to ask for a little bit more for a game it knows will be one of the biggest releases of 2023. But what factors in the game industry and world's economy at large caused Nintendo to make this decision? 
Priced Out
For more than a decade, people got comfortable with AAA video games being priced at $60. Of course, there were occasional exceptions to this rule, but it was seen as an industry standard until the dawn of the PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X. Publisher 2K was one of the first to announce a price increase, and companies like EA, Sony, and Microsoft have all followed suit. Jijiashvili chalks this up to inflation-related pressure on game publishers.
"The games industry has already been experiencing a lot of inflationary pressure," he explains. "AAA games are much more expensive to make now than they used to be, but prices have actually been declining in inflation-adjusted terms -- if prices had risen with inflation since 1990, they would now be over $90. On top of that, we’ve had a big burst of general inflation, meaning that publishers are looking at big increases in everything from salaries to tools. It’s going to be really hard for most publishers to avoid passing on all those extra costs at some point."
Jijiashvili provided us with a graphic created by Omdia that "shows what the typical price points for each generation would look like if you adjusted for inflation." As you can see, the inflation-adjusted prices are only exponentially growing, and the big game pricing shifts the graph highlights were all technically not even enough to keep up with inflation when they happened. 

Read more
The best video game remakes reinvent the classics, they don’t just revisit them
Isaac Clarke stands in a dark room in Dead Space.

The video game industry has remake fever. While the idea of redoing a classic game is nothing new (see something as old as 1993’s Super Mario All-Stars), we’re currently experiencing a wave of remakes as developers revisit some of the best games of the 2000s and beyond. Last year we got The Last of Us Part I and Crisis Core: Final Fantasy Reunion, while 2023 will see games like Resident Evil 4 getting a full redo hot on the heels of Dead Space. Like a Dragon: Ishin, Advance Wars 1+2: Re-boot Camp, Silent Hill 2, System Shock … the list seemingly grows with every passing month.

With so many remakes filling up 2023’s game release calendar, I find myself asking a simple question: Why? That’s not a cynical question directed at the overall concept of remakes, but rather one that’s worth asking on an individual project level. Why is 2023 the right moment to reboot a series? What will this remake do to deepen my understanding of the original game? Are more modern graphics enough to justify a retread into a 15-year-old game that still plays well by today’s standards, or would that time and money have been better spent moving forward?

Read more
Wordle’s wild year: New York Times breaks down the phenomenon’s big 2022
Close-up of Wordle up on a smartphone.

If you logged onto Twitter exactly one year ago, you can probably recall the moment you began to see your feed fill up with gray, yellow, and green boxes. Though it launched in 2021 and gained mainstream popularity in December of that year, Wordle became a sudden cultural phenomenon in early 2022 that was inescapable outside of a muted words list. It was a rare gaming success story, one that could reach a broad audience thanks to its elegant simplicity.

Wordle’s fortune would escalate just as quickly as its user base. In late January 2022, the New York Times announced it had acquired the puzzle game from creator Josh Wardle in an undisclosed, low-seven-figure deal -- a left-field move that almost eclipsed Sony’s announcement that it was acquiring Destiny 2 developer Bungie just hours earlier. The move would spark some worry among fans, who feared that a corporate takeover of the most independent game imaginable could steal its soul.

Read more