Skip to main content

4 reasons Comcast’s tarnished reputation is beyond repair

You may have seen the commercials: Veteran comedian Jim Gaffigan inexplicably riding along in a Comcast van, asking the employee to give him one reason he should believe Comcast has really changed. It feels a little hand fed — more corporate fiction than real world fact. However, with several new moves, including the re-assignment of VP Charlie Herrin from Product Design and development to head of “Customer Experience,” the oft ranked “most hated company in America” aims to show it really is serious about turning things around.

But is it even possible?

History has proven that, be ye an individual or a massive conglomerate, once you’ve gone down a certain path, it’s really difficult to change course. No matter how many changes are made, the issue of trust remains, and it’s hard for those who have been wronged in the past to believe in real change, even if improvements appear right in front of them.

Here are four reasons Comcast may be beyond salvation.

Our hatred is deep-seated

Comcast is all too aware of its bad reputation. Criticized for everything from its power-hungry grab for Time Warner Cable and thwarting Net Neutrality, to its zealous employee’s famed 8-minute phone call, continuously denying tech journalist Ryan Block the right to cancel service, Comcast is the villain we love to hate. In a statement announcing Herrin as the Special VP in charge of pleasing the public, CEO of Comcast Cable Neil Smit admitted there’s a long road ahead.

“Transformation isn’t going to happen overnight,” Smit wrote. “In fact, it may take a few years before we can honestly say that a great customer experience is something we’re known for. But that is our goal and our number one priority … and that’s what we are going to do.”

Even “a few years” time frame seems a little optimistic — let’s face it, Comcast is a big ship, and big ships don’t turn on a dime. While poor customer service experiences may be the perpetual reminder of Comcast’s loathed position in the hearts of its subscribers, it’s really just the face of the problem. Underneath that terse exterior lies a litany of past transgressions by the country’s largest ISPs; skeletons stacked high in the closet that won’t disappear with a friendly phone call, or two-hour delivery windows.

We don’t feel like we have a choice

For millions of people, as far as high-speed Internet goes, it’s Comcast or bust.

Even if Comcast offered a fantastic customer experience, the lack of any viable competition makes customers feel totally powerless; this naturally creates tension. Having no other choice never feels good, even if you would never exercise it.

As the largest ISP in the land, Comcast naturally takes the brunt of much of the anger over the new regulations.

Sure, you can cancel service with Comcast, but then what? For many subscribers, there is nowhere to go for high-speed Internet. This total lack of any real alternative in many of Comcast’s regions of operation has led many to call for the regulation of all major Internet Service Providers under Title II designation, in the same way other necessary utilities such as water and power are controlled.

However, the FCC, which is headed by seasoned cable and communications lobbyist Tom Wheeler, has been hesitant to acquiesce to such calls and, in fact, has introduced new rules to create so-called Internet fast lanes, which many say would make it easier for service providers to shake down larger companies to pay bigger fees for faster service. Many consumer advocates, and even large corporations like Google and Yahoo, have called the new proposals a threat to Net neutrality, or a free internet, and millions of people have logged comments with the FCC.

As the largest ISP in the land, Comcast naturally takes the brunt of much of the anger over the new regulations (or lack thereof), and its proposal to purchase the second-largest ISP in the land, Time Warner Cable, for $45.2 billion has only furthered the public’s distrust. But it’s not just its position as a mammoth, undisputed ruler of the Internet that has put Comcast in the crosshairs.

Comcast abuses us and other companies we like

Comcast has been regularly accused of dirty dealings with online services using its subscribers as pawns. The company was implicitly named by Internet transit provider Level3, for essentially throttling, or purposely slowing down, Internet traffic for its own customers. While the company does not directly call out Comcast, it claims that five major ISPs in the U.S. have been throttling service for customers by refusing to upgrade the infrastructure on their side of the connection, which causes slower connection speeds.

Netflix, which recently signed agreements with several major ISPs (including Comcast) to alleviate increasingly slower streaming speeds on their networks, goes further with its accusations of Comcast. In a 250-page petition with the FCC arguing against the proposed Comcast/Time Warner merger, Netflix claims the resulting super-company would have even higher market strength, allowing it to leverage its one-game-in-town dynamic to implement “degradation strategies,” essentially extorting streaming services like Netflix, and other companies for access to its subscribers.

And those are just a few of the accusations made against Comcast, which has already grown to a size and position that essentially makes it untouchable. If you had no real consequences for your actions, how would you behave?

We’re not interested in what it’s selling anymore

Regardless of its position of Internet supremacy, Comcast’s highly profitable Xfinity service is under assault from the new era of over-the-top (OTT) video services. That competition comes directly from its new partner/adversary Netflix, dozens of other online services that have cropped up in recent years, and forthcoming services from conventional providers like Dish Network, which is putting together an affordable online pay-TV service for those who have left the traditional broadcast fold.

Comcast is hoping to improve its reputation, even as it attempts to consolidate power like never before.

While it may hold the cards when it comes to the Internet pipelines, with so much OTT competition, the traditional cable paradigm is now under siege and Comcast knows it. In a recent speech before colleagues at Cable-Tech Expo 2014, Comcast CTO Tony Werner said the company’s Xfinity triple-play bundle is no longer enough for consumers, and challenged his fellow competitors to raise the bar.

Still, while Werner suggested new innovations involving cloud services, he stopped short of suggesting any major changes to the traditional cable delivery method. In other words, no OTT is on the docket for Comcast as of yet.

A kind and gentle master

Comcast has set a new course to become the massive superpower with a heart, that loves its subjects. Following other Goliaths of their respective fields like Google, which is famous for its “Don’t be evil,” mission statement, Comcast is hoping to improve its reputation, even as it attempts to consolidate power like never before. But, even if Comcast can turn the tables and create a satisfying overall customer experience, can it create enough goodwill to move from loathed to loved?

Given all of the challenges noted above, that transformation may be too much for any corporation to pull-off, no matter what lengths are taken. It’s hard to imagine a smiling face (or voice?) will erase Comcast’s past transgressions, or ease the fears that the company is an unstoppable force that’s about to become even more expansive and powerful.

But hey, it’s not like you can do anything about it anyway.

Ryan Waniata
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Ryan Waniata is a multi-year veteran of the digital media industry, a lover of all things tech, audio, and TV, and a…
The Beats Studio Buds+ are only $100 this week — 41% off!
Beats Studio Buds+ in Transparent case open with earbuds outside

Wireless earbuds are all the rage in 2025, and we here at Digital Trends are always on the lookout for the best deals on these class-leading in-ear pairs. And this week, the spotlight goes to the incredible Beats Studio Buds+. Right now, you’ll be able to score these fantastic buds for only $100, which is a $70 markdown from its original $170 price.

Why you should buy the Beats Studio Buds+ 

Read more
Wiim debuts the Sub Pro, its first wireless subwoofer
Wiim Sub Pro.

Wiim is on a tear right now. Alongside the reveal of its first wireless speaker, the Wiim Sound, and its new Amp Ultra, the wireless audio company has announced its first wireless subwoofer, the Wiim Sub Pro. It can connect wirelessly (or via a wire) to Wiim's network music streamers and amps, and the company says its 250-watt class D amp will faithfully reproduce frequencies down to 25Hz without distortion.

Like its other two announcements, Wiim hasn't given us pricing or specific availability for the Sub Pro, saying only that it will be available starting in Q3 2025 on Amazon and at select retailers.

Read more
Wiim’s new Amp Ultra goes above and beyond its amplified streamers
Wiim Amp Ultra.

For those seeking the ultimate all-in-one network music streamer and two-channel stereo amplifier, Wiim might just have exactly what you want. Its new Wiim Amp Ultra, which debuts at the High End Munich 2025 show alongside its first wireless speaker (Wiim Sound) and Wiim Sub Pro wireless subwoofer, appears to be the company's award-winning Wiim Ultra, but packed with 100 watts of amplification and internal components that exceed the capabilities of Wiim's current Wiim Amp, Amp Pro, and Vibelink Amp, plus Dolby Digital decoding -- a first for the Wiim lineup.

Much like the Wiim Sound and Wiim Sub Pro, the company hasn't released pricing or availability for the Amp Ultra, saying only that it will be available in Q3 2025 through Amazon and select retail partners. However, given that the Wiim Amp Pro and Vibelink Amp both sell for $299, it's likely that the Amp Ultra will be more expensive, but by how much is hard to say -- especially when tariffs are factored in.

Read more