Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Your next earbuds maybe shouldn’t be earbuds at all

Phil Nickinson wearing both the Ray-Ban Meta smart lasses and the Shokz OpenFit earbuds.
You can wear smart glasses. Or you can wear earbuds. But you probably don’t need both. Phil Nickinson / Digital Trends

I’m a big fan of having the right tool for the right job — which is something I’ve definitely said before. If you’re a photographer, it means you probably have more than one lens. If you’re a chef, you have more than one knife or pan. You don’t take a sedan muddin’, as they say in my neck of the woods. And you don’t take a johnboat 100 miles offshore to go fishing.

Recommended Videos

The same can be true for headphones. There are real reasons to have more than one pair. I wouldn’t work out in full over-the-ears cans. (And can’t understand how the kids these days do.) But nor would I wear AirPods Pro when I’m cycling. That’s when open-ear earbuds, or bone-conduction headphones — something that doesn’t actually go inside your ear and block ambient sound — are required.

But lately I’ve found myself more often grabbing a multitasker. Headphones that — for me, anyway — are able to do the job in more than a single category. I still wouldn’t wear them to the gym, but I have worn them on a bike. I’ll wear them while driving, but won’t actually use them.

The “headphones” in question? The $299 Ray-Ban Meta sunglasses.

Smart glasses with decent-enough speakers mean you might not need proper earbuds with you.

Due to the nature of this job, I have a decent stable of current wireless earbuds and headphones from which to choose. And I’ve been leaving the house more often lately only with the Ray-Bans. Not because they’re the best headphones I have. But having the Ray-Bans on hand means I don’t have to carry sunglasses — a must here in Florida — as well as a separate pair of earbuds. That means one fewer thing in my pockets.

A lot of that decision comes down to the circumstances. My day starts at 4:45 a.m. when I leave for the gym. And I do so with my AirPods Pro in my pocket. It’s dark, so I don’t need sunglasses just yet. (Though now that we’re hitting daylight saving time again, the sun is well up by the time I’m headed home a couple hours later.)

Phil Nickinson wearing the Apple AirPods Pro and Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses.
There are times that only the AirPods Pro will do. But the Ray-Ban Meta often are the only “earbuds” in my bag. Phil Nickinson / Digital Trends

But on the weekends, when I’m traveling with one or both kids at soccer tournaments? The Ray-Bans — and their charging case — have been all I’ve had with me. The case part is important because these things don’t have the biggest batteries. But I’ve yet to use them so much that I’ve completely drained them before getting them some time back in their case. And if you’re going spend that much money on sunglasses, you really should keep them in a case they’re when not on your face.

And there’s something just more casual about taking a quick phone call — or surreptitiously listing to music or a podcast — while you’re outside doing other things. If I’m going to have thrash metal bouncing around my brain all day anyway, why not actually listen to something when I can?

Again, sunglasses don’t make for the best earbuds or headphones (or whatever we want to call this category) you can buy. If you want something open-eared, go for the Shokz OpenFit, which sound better than the Ray-Bans and cut through wind noise that much more. And I wouldn’t rely on the Ray-Bans on an airplane for any number of reasons. Battery. Noise cancellation. The possibility of sound being heard by my seatmates. For that, I’ll stick with the Beats Studio Pro, or my older-but-trusty Sonys.

But if I’m going to be somewhere that doesn’t require more specialized hardware? It might well just be me and the Ray-Bans. And I’m not alone in that idea.

Phil Nickinson
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Phil spent the 2000s making newspapers with the Pensacola (Fla.) News Journal, the 2010s with Android Central and then the…
The “best TV under $500” just got a 32% price cut
The Hisense U6N Series 4K ULED TV.

Isn’t it nice when consumer tech doesn’t cost a fortune? It’s even nicer when you’re shopping around for a TV and don’t have the budget to go full-on premium. Fortunately, brands like Hisense are all about delivering fantastic picture quality and other great features, but at a price most of us can agree on. We also see a ton of great TV deals on a weekly basis, including this offer: 

Right now, when you purchase the Hisense 565-inch U6N Series 4K ULED at Amazon or Best Buy, you’ll only pay $500. The full MSRP on this model is $750. We named the 55-inch model the best TV under $500, and today you can get the 65-inch model for that price!

Read more
Our pick for the “best Google TV” is $300 off today
Hisense U8N

Who doesn’t love a budget-friendly TV? While leading brands like Samsung, Sony, and LG offer numerous entry-level 4K LED models, your wallet will be much better off with a Hisense. This tried and true manufacturer has been producing some of the most popular QLED TVs on the market, and we see TV deals for them on a regular basis. 

The company’s prices are pretty great to begin with, but this week you’ll be able to score the Hisense 55-inch U8N Series 4K ULED for only $700. The MSRP on this model is $1,000, which means you’ll be saving another $300 on a TV that’s already inexpensive (at least when compared to the competition). 

Read more
This popular Samsung 85-inch QLED TV has a $500 discount today
The Samsung 70-inch Q60D QLED 4K Tizen TV against a white background.

If you’re looking for a monstrous TV but don’t want to remortgage your home to afford the big purchase, you may want to take a gander at our list of the best 85-inch TV deals. And if you’re partial to Samsung TVs, you’ll be glad to know that the following model is on sale:

For a limited time, when you purchase the Samsung 85-inch Q60D Series 4K QLED at Amazon or Best Buy, you’ll only pay $1,000. The full MSRP for this TV is $1,700. 

Read more