Skip to main content

Which streaming service will win the NFL’s favor? Let’s go to the chalkboard

If it seems like every major streaming service has been in the conversation to acquire the rights to distribute the highly desired NFL Sunday Ticket package, you’re right. Anonymous sources have been busy in 2021. Amazon has been in talks. So has Disney. Anyone with money, really.

The latest round has Apple, whose discussions leaked earlier in the summer, as the preferred suitor, according to yet more anonymous sources from The Athletic. And it goes on to say that “everything is on the table,” including a more à la carte plan that would allow you to only pay for the games you actually want to watch, something that’s been verboten in the television world since, well, forever.

The suitors are many, and they’ve got deep pockets. DirecTV has been paying something like $1.5 billion a year for the rights to Sunday Ticket, and that’s supposed to go up to $2 billion a year after the current deal expires at the end of the 2022-23 season.

It’s all up in the air at this point, like a badly thrown ball from Ben Roethlisberger that could either find its way into the end zone or wobbles like a wounded duck. But it’s also worth a little exploration of where the services and their parent companies stand today in the early weeks of the 2021 NFL season. Things undoubtedly will change, and it’s important to remember that the NFL earlier this year signed a wave of new contracts that take the television players through 2033. But that’s not counting Sunday Ticket, and it’s certainly nothing that the contract lawyers couldn’t work out.

So let’s throw some wild speculation around for a few hundred words.

NFL games on Amazon Prime Video.
Phil Nickinson/Digital Trends


This one’s a real possibility. For one, Amazon already has the rights for Thursday Night Football, and has for a few years now. While that’s not exactly a marquee night for sports of any kind, it’s still an exclusive. And if there’s one thing sports leagues and tech companies (and the execs of both) love, it’s to be the first or only one to be doing something.

And Amazon also has another foothold into the league with its “Next Gen Stats,” which is “powered by AWS.” That’s shorthand for Amazon Web Services, which in a general sense means Amazon’s extremely powerful — and extremely profitable — cloud computing platform that basically powers a huge portion of the internet. The players have trackers built into their pads, and that gives all sorts data that gets fed back to the league, and to the viewers, during the game. Are those stats useful? Do we really care how far someone ran, or how fast they ran? Or what sort of percentage someone had to pull off some sort of play?

That last bit is, perhaps, a little much. Either a receiver catches the ball, or he doesn’t. Either a kick is good, or it’s not. Football is, as they say, a game of inches. Anything can happen. Amazon sponsoring some fuzzy math may make for better television in a sport that sees something like 20 minutes of actual action in a 3-hour broadcast. And that’s being generous.

NFL Next Gen Stats

Thursday Night Football and Next Gen Stats could actually work against Amazon getting the full selection of games in a Sunday Ticket-style deal. The NFL already has money coming in from Amazon, in addition to its other sources. Better to keep that revenue stream diversified. Unless, of course, we’re talking huge numbers in the new deal.

There’s also the question of platform. Amazon has millions and millions of impressions on its website and its apps, and it’s got the full force of Alexa behind it. But what it doesn’t have is its own dedicated pipeline into your pocket via a phone like Google does in Android, or Apple does in the iPhone. It does, however, have Amazon Fire TV, and that’s a pretty big leg up over both of those companies. Amazon also is about to unleash its own branded televisions on the population. And while that maybe doesn’t do anything different in reality, you could see that being a selling point on a slide deck somewhere.


I’d consider Google to be a dark horse in this competition. It’s never really been in the conversation, though it certainly has the technology and the bank account to get it done if it wants to.

In Google’s favor is its streaming acumen, of course. It runs YouTube, which is the name you think of when you think of streaming video. It also has YouTube TV, which is at worst the third-largest live TV streaming service in the United States, and quite probably the second-largest. (If it had more than the 3.7 million subscribers Hulu With Live TV publicly boasts, the PR machine probably would have said something by now.)

Then there’s Android, which puts phones in pockets in a large way, and to a lesser degree onto TV screens via Chromecast and Google TV. There’s also the Nest Home suite of small screens, but those probably don’t really move the needle at all.

Working against Google is the fact that it’s, well, Google. The company isn’t exactly known for having the greatest focus when it comes to something new and a little outside its normal lanes of operation. It’s also had a couple pretty public feuds this year already in the entertainment space, first with Roku, and now with NBCUniversal. If there’s anything the NFL doesn’t like, its dirty laundry being aired publicly.


If you had to pin me down and demand I predict which streaming platform will steer the NFL for the next decade or so, I’d say it’ll be Apple. There are a few reasons for that.

First, it’s the hardware. Putting NFL Sunday Ticket (or whatever else it might be called under a new deal) exclusively in the Apple camp would give the league a direct line to your iPhone and your iPad. It’d have access to your Apple ID email. It’d have access to the notifications on your devices. That’s a lot of marketing power.

It’d also give the NFL’s subscription service a pipeline onto your television via a number of methods. The Apple TV hardware is the obvious option, but Apple’s television play now expands far beyond Apple devices. Apple TV+ very quickly made its way onto other platforms, starting with Samsung smart TVs. And there are full Apple TV+ apps for Roku, Amazon Fire TV, Android TV, and Google TV. Android phones — there are a lot of them out there — aren’t totally left out; they’ll just have to watch in a web browser, which is how you’ll also be watching on Windows on Chrome OS.

And then there’s the payment mechanism. If there’s one thing Apple’s gotten good at over the past 10 years or so, it’s making it super easy for you to fork over your money in the middle of some other experience. The idea of clicking your power button a couple times to watch the Bills play the Bucs (or whatever) and having it just work should be extremely enticing to the NFL suits.

On the other hand, there’s that pesky Apple tax.


Roku isn’t going to get an NFL streaming contract. At least not on its own. The simple fact is while it may play in the same sandbox as Amazon in terms of products like streaming sticks and advertising — it has the No. 1 streaming platform in the United States and No. 2 in the rest of the world — it simply doesn’t have anywhere near the same kind of cash flow as the likes of Amazon ($7.8 billion in the second fiscal quarter of 2021), Google ($17.9 billion in the second quarter), or Apple ($21.7 billion in its third quarter).

Roku’s latest net income? Just $645 million in the second quarter of 2021. That’s not bad, it’s just not in the same league as the others. Amazon, the closest of the Big 3, saw 169% more money in the most recent quarter.

That’s not to say you should count out Roku entirely. It’s got reach going for it, with its 55 million active accounts — and that number was up 28% year over year. It’s got The Roku Channel, which is available on the web, as well as on Roku devices and Amazon Fire TV.

But Roku also has literally every other service we’ve talked about above on its platform, so there’s no real reason for the NFL to go down this road.

Just never say never.


The Walt Disney Co. owns ABC and ESPN on traditional television, and Hulu and Disney+ in the streaming space. And it’s got a serious bottom line. We’re talking Google-level money of $17 billion in the second quarter. That’s across the whole company, of course, and good chunk of that revenue comes from parks. About 29% of the second fiscal quarter entertainment revenue came from outside the United States, and we’re not even going to get close to touching the intricacies of international distribution rights.

But think about the domestic product. Hulu has a total of 39.1 million subscribers as of August 2021. Some 3.7 million of them are on Hulu With Live TV. Disney+, which has expanded internationally over the past year, now has a whopping 116 million subscribers worldwide. ESPN+ has 14.9 million. Things get messy when you consider that ESPN already has Monday Night Football, and will for the next decade or so. But there’s no denying the reach that all of those Disney-owned properties maintain.

I wouldn’t rule Disney out of the equation, and Disney has been included in rumor stories, too. But this is also one of those situations in which everyone is always talking to everyone about everything.

The other broadcasters

We’re going to lump the likes of CBS, NBC, and Fox together for a few reasons. First is that all three already have existing deals to broadcast NFL games, and that’s not going to change anytime soon. CBS keeps the AFC. NBC has Sunday Night Football and a few Super Bowls. Fox keeps the NFC.

The streaming side of the equation is interesting, but perhaps not at the scale that would make things work for a Sunday Ticket-style deal.

CBS has Paramount+, which actually has been going fairly heavy on sports — particularly, the non-American style of football. NBC has Peacock, which is the butt of many streaming jokes but still exists in the abstract. And Fox has Tubi, which just launched a big “Sports on Tubi” push with a swatch of on-demand content from the NFL, Major League Baseball, NASCAR, and more. Tubi has some 33 million monthly active users. But what it doesn’t have, unlike Peacock and Paramount+, is a subscription service. Tubi is completely supported by advertising. It’s doubtful that the NFL would serve up out-of-market games for those kinds of peanuts.

Editors' Recommendations

Phil Nickinson
Phil spent the 2000s making newspapers with the Pensacola (Fla.) News Journal, the 2010s with Android Central and then the…
Prime Video’s first solo Thursday Night Football NFL game went … fine
Thursday Night Football on Amazon Prime Video.

So Amazon Prime Video streamed its first actually exclusive Thursday Night Football game. (That's the name of the show because all shows must be named, in addition to actually being the night on which said football was played. It'd be awkward if TNF was played on Friday, but as we saw in 2020, stranger things have happened.) And because all things must be critiqued in 2022, we're happy to report that it went ... OK.

To be clear, Prime Video is no stranger to streaming football games. It's done so for a number of seasons now on Thursday nights. But those games also have been available elsewhere, either on broadcast channels or on the NFL Network.

Read more
Cut the cord: Quit cable for the best streaming services
The LG G1 Gallery Series OLED TV.

So you want to cut the cord and join the streaming revolution? There are so many on-demand streaming services available now such as Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime Video, HBO Max, and Disney+ to name a few. Add to that that the growing selection of live TV streaming services, such as Hulu Plus Live TV, Sling TV, ESPN+, and YouTube TV, as well as live HD broadcasts with an antenna. The whole thing can be rather confusing, especially when you're trying to pick the best streaming services for you. We'll walk you through everything you need to know to finally cut the cord and kick cable to the curb.

Not everyone is cut out to be a cord-cutter, though. Ditching your satellite or cable subscription and the bill it carries sounds great in theory, but it's not something you want to rush into without a bit of research. Let's go through the best methods for dropping traditional cable in favor of some of the best streaming services.
First things first: How's your internet?
The thing about internet-delivered TV is that you need a broadband connection that can keep up with the streaming lifestyle. This may seem like a foregone conclusion, but we want to make it clear that if you're going to bet your precious entertainment future on your home network, you had better have a solid internet connection. Netflix and other similar streaming video services suggest a minimum downstream speed of 5Mbps for HD streaming, but if you have inadequate home internet connection (like 5Mbps) that is not going to allow for a smooth streaming service experience, especially when you consider other devices also using the connection. You will likely experience buffering and possible crashing of the show you are streaming, especially for those with families or households streaming more than one show or movie at a time.
High-quality streaming needs higher-speed internet
Of course, if you're looking to get into the streaming big leagues to access the growing array of 4K Ultra HD streaming content available from Netflix, Amazon, Disney+, YouTube, and others, you'll want to kick up your broadband speed to at least 25Mbps. If you're only going to be downloading 4K content from sites like FandangoNow or Ultraflix -- which offer 4K content at speeds as low as 4Mbps to 10Mbps -- 25Mbps will probably suffice, but regardless of which streaming service you select, fast and reliable internet is key to a positive streaming experience.
Peak internet usage time can affect your streaming
We also recommend testing your internet speed at peak streaming hours (between 6 and 10 p.m. on weekdays) to determine if your neighborhood struggles under the strain of heavy traffic. For example, if you routinely get around 10Mbps downloads during the day, but that speed takes a dive to about 3Mbps around dinner time, you'll want to call your internet provider to see if anything can be done. Fortunately, this is an increasingly rare problem outside of rural areas, but better to check ahead.
Check your home network equipment
Don't forget to check your home network equipment. Most modern routers and modems should offer up all the speed you need, but non-gigabit equipment may not suffice for simultaneous 4K streams. Any hiccups in your experience also may be caused by weird technical issues such as improper port forwarding, wireless interference, or other random things that are tricky to track down, some of which we'll attempt to help you troubleshoot. If you're unsure about any of it, be sure to give your internet service provider a call.

Read more
Why Apple (still) shouldn’t make a streaming device for cheapskates
Apple TV, Roku, Amazon Fire TV and Chromecast With Google TV.

The Internet — that is folks who likely spend too much time on it — loves nothing more than to speculate about what Apple may do. Or even better, what Apple should do. The more foolish among us are sold bold as to say what Apple will do.

Today, let us be so bold. (And possibly foolish.) There has been a decent amount of scuttlebutt regarding the possibility of a low-cost Apple TV dongle. And on one hand, that makes a whole lot of sense. Apple's current TV-centric hardware, the aptly named Apple TV 4K (not to be confused with the Apple TV app, which we'll come to in a second, or the Apple TV+ streaming service, which we'll also touch on) is a fine piece of kit, as they say in the biz. It's overpowered for what it does, meaning that it streams shows and movies and the like really well, without any sort of lag or hesitation. It has just about every spec you could want. It serves as a HomeKit hub. It plays music and shows photos and allows you to seamlessly mirror your iPhone or iPad or Mac to your TV. The only problem is that it is several times more expensive than what most folks are buying these days, edging toward $200.

Read more