Skip to main content

Facebook forced to face class action lawsuit over children’s online purchases

Facebook must change how it handles online transactions made by minors. That’s the message a group of plaintiffs estimated in the hundreds of thousands have for the social network, and now they can push forward with their nationwide class-action lawsuit against the social network, reports Reuters.

U.S. District Judge Beth Labson Freeman in San Jose, California gave the plaintiffs the thumbs-up earlier this week to push forward with their lawsuit, which asks for Facebook to provide refunds for those whose children spent their money without their permission. J.R. Parker, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, was pleased with the decision.

Recommended Videos

Facebook believes the lawsuit lacks any merit, and said the plaintiffs’ claims were very disparate.

“We’re very pleased with the decision,” Parker told the outlet. “The difference between Facebook and other businesses is that the company is on actual notice of a user’s age, but treats children the same as adult users when it comes to taking their money.”

According to the judge, while the people can’t pursue refunds as a group — since their situations would vary on a case-by-case basis — they can seek individual refunds. The lawsuit, originally brought forth in April of 2012, said Facebook allowed children to use their parents’ credit and debit cards to purchase Facebook Credit, the social network’s now-defunct virtual currency. The lawsuit also said Facebook violated California law by not allowing refunds, thanks to its “all sales are final” policy.

The lawsuit was brought forth by two children and their parents. One child was allowed to spend $20 on Ninja Saga using his mother’s credit card, but was later charged several hundred dollars for purchases with “virtual, in-game currency.” The other child used his parents’ debit card without permission, spending $1,059.

Facebook believes the lawsuit lacks any merit, and said the plaintiffs’ claims were very disparate. With the lawsuit now moving forward, Facebook said it will defend itself vigorously.

Judge Freeman said California law protects parents and their children in instances where children “occasionally use their lack of judgment” when purchasing things they shouldn’t have bought in the first place.

“Though some minors undoubtedly may wish to continue making purchases through credit or debit cards they do not have permission to use, such a desire cannot prevent the named plaintiffs from bringing suit to demand that Facebook’s policies comply with the law,” said the judge.

Unfortunately for Facebook, this isn’t the first time a company has come under scrutiny for this. Apple found itself in a very similar situation at the start of 2014, and the company eventually had toreimburse customers to the tune of $32.5 million. Google also agreed to issue refunds to similarly affected customers to the tune of $19 million, while also making changes to the Play Store to make it more difficult for children to make in-app purchases without permission. Amazon, meanwhile, was sued by the FTC, though there is still no resolution to the case.

Williams Pelegrin
Williams is an avid New York Yankees fan, speaks Spanish, resides in Colorado, and has an affinity for Frosted Flakes. Send…
Facebook ordered to pay $650 million in facial recognition lawsuit
The Facebook home page on a screen.

 

A federal judge has ordered Facebook to pay $650 million -- $100 million more than originally agreed -- to settle a 2015 facial recognition lawsuit, according to a Wednesday court filing.

Read more
Baseus power banks are the best way to charge your phone after these discounts
A woman holding a phone with a Baseus Am41 Magnetic Power Bank attached to it.

One of the worst things about being a doomscroller isn't the information you're getting, it's the fear that your battery will die and the scrolling will have to end. This is especially true if you're stuck without power, waiting for the doctor or dentist to finally call your name, or have any other sort of emergency. But, Baseus has you covered with their excellent selection of on-the-go power banks made for your iPhone. Since they're small and fit directly to your phone's magnet charging area, you can think of them more as battery extenders than anything. Plus, if your phone's internal battery is starting to have battery trouble, a Baseus charger is a great way to avoid an annoying battery change session. The best news, however, is that they're all on sale. Here's what you can expect to see coming up:

Baseus Am31 Mini Power Bank — Was $70, Now $50

Read more
Nothing Phone 3: A unique phone that’s not a true flagship
The Nothing Phone 3 in white

As smartphones have become extremely homogenous, companies must find unique ways to stand out from the crowd. For London-based Nothing, this has meant a singular company focus on blending smartphone features with unique designs that allow their phones to stand out in a sea of sameness.

The Nothing Phone 3 is the latest addition to a line of Nothing phones that are unique and polarizing in their design. Earlier this year, Nothing launched the Phone 3a Pro with a unique camera array, and the Phone 3 builds on this while also evolving the Nothing design language.

Read more