Skip to main content

This app gives any smartwatch underwater superpowers

A smartwatch with underwater GPS coordinates
An app showing underwater positioning data University of Washington

The Global Positioning System — short for GPS — is the most widely-used system for positioning and estimating time by establishing a wireless communication channel with satellites. Smartphones rely on this system, and so do smartwatches, especially those targeted at sports enthusiasts. However, when it comes to underwater activities like scuba diving or deep-sea snorkeling, it’s not of much use.

That’s because GPS waves simply don’t offer much in terms of liquid penetration as the radio waves it relies on break down rapidly in water. That means if you take a dip with your Apple Watch and seek to explore some underwater sites, don’t rely on GPS for someone to keep an eye on — and find — you. But there’s a novel solution that can give GPS-like location superpowers to virtually any smartwatch out there.

The folks at the University of Washington have developed an app that allows underwater divers to communicate with each other via their smartphones, essentially creating a GPS-like three-dimensional location triangulation net. The key benefit here is that a team leader can always keep an eye on the rest of the divers venturing underwater with them and make sure that they don’t stray away from the group.

A solution like this could save lives, especially in scenarios where underwater visibility is low, making it difficult or even impossible for a team leader to see every single diver in the group. If one of the divers gets entangled in ropes or any other emergency befalls them, the app could help triangulate their location and save their life.

How the smartwatch app works

Locating underwater position of divers using a smartwatch app.
A person wearing a smartwatch that triangulates underwater position University of Washington

The app is able to triangulate underwater coordinates for a group of divers within a range of 30 meters. What the app does is it treats each diver’s smartwatch as a node and then creates the 3D location map based on the relative distance to the team leader’s smartwatch when it sends an audio ping.

As more divers are added to the group, the app’s location estimation also extends as long as each diver is within a 30-meter range. For a sample network in which four or five smartwatches are involved, the median error at estimating the 3D location underwater falls between 0.5-0.9 m and 0.9-1.6 m.

Alright, so the app will help a team leader keep an eye on the entire group — but what about their real location for a person above the surface? “You would need an anchor device that is above the water surface, say, fixed to a buoy or positioned on a boat,” Shyam Gallakota a professor at the University of Washington’s Allen School and lead author of the research paper, tells Digital Trends.

Specifically, the leader’s smartwatch must be linked wirelessly to an anchor device for “proper” location estimation so that a person above the surface can keep an eye on the leader and their entire group’s three-dimensional formation beneath the surface.

No special gear required

A person using the Apple Watch Ultra while scuba diving underwater.
Smartwatches like the Apple Watch Ultra are well-equipped for underwater sports. Newsroom / Apple

The biggest victory here is that the app doesn’t use any specialized hardware to do its job. All you need is an Apple Watch or a Wear OS smartwatch that offers the necessary ingress protection to survive underwater, and you’re good to go. And that’s because the novel location tracking system relies on sound waves.

The app prompts the smartwatches to emit a sound using its onboard speaker array while the microphone picks up the signal underwater. Gollakota explains that it takes about 1.5 seconds for the audio ping to make its way back to the team leader’s smartwatch.

Gollakota defines the innovation as “the first underwater acoustic 3D positioning system for smartwatches” that doesn’t require any external gear. Interestingly, the system should also work just fine on a smartphone as they also have the speaker and mic array ready for 3D location estimation. “The smartwatches basically transmit very tiny chirps and then use the microphone to communicate,” he explained.

In fact, deploying a phone could very well open the doors for visual odometry. When asked why the team skipped that side, “Well, taking a smartphone for an underwater dive is just not as convenient as a smartwatch,” Gollokota tells me. It’s a valid point. Plus, not many smartphones out there can survive immersion at the kind of depths required for deep-water adventure sports.

What gives?

Apple Watch SE 2 with the Apple Watch Ultra.
Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The system is not without its limitations. Gollakota tells us that for the system to work, it needs at least three smartwatches in the group talking to each other via sound waves. When there are only two smartwatches involved, the app can only provide ranging information. That’s because each smartwatch in the group works as a node. The more the merrier, because having more than three smartwatches in a connected pool only enhances the location triangulation accuracy.

Another pitfall is that it is not a continuous location tracking system. Instead, it’s a voluntary localization system, which means the team leader has to press a button so that their smartwatch emits an audio signal, which is then picked up by other smartwatches nearby.

The biggest caveat, however, is that the app is currently not available to download from Apple or Google’s app stores. Instead, the team at the University of Washington has uploaded the entire code to GitHub in hopes that it will be picked up by the developer community to make an app that will subsequently be released on the Google Play Store and the Apple App Store.

That’s a minor inconvenience in itself, despite the code’s free availability. Compared to simply installing an app from a digital store, running an app off the code from GitHub takes a certain level of technical expertise. Gollakota tells us that the team is working to get the situation sorted but says it’s not a particularly easy process to create an Apple Watch app, given the stringent quality and UX rules on the App Store.

The Apple Watch Ultra with the Apple Watch Series 8 and Watch SE 2.
(Left to right) Apple Watch SE 2, Apple Watch Series 8, and Apple Watch Ultra Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Though the team used an Apple Watch Ultra during the test phase, Gollakota told Digital Trends that the code is compatible with Android as well. That means it can be used to create an app that runs on Wear OS (by Google) smartwatches. However, when it comes to generic smartwatches running custom skins based on the RTOS foundation — such as those sold by OnePlus, Honor, Xiaomi, etc. — there is no feasible future for the app.

Irrespective of the technical limitations described above, the underwater GPS app developed by the experts at the University of Washington is still a massive leap forward. The best part is that it won’t burden an average smartphone user to spend money on any specialized gear for their smartwatch. It’s just a matter of time, and some luck, before the app becomes available in its finished form from an application store(s).

Interestingly, experts at the same institution took a similar acoustic approach and developed the first underwater messaging app not too long ago. Digital Trends also talked with Joseph Breda, a research student at the University of Washington, who developed an app that allows a smartphone to measure body temperature without requiring any specialized add-on kit or sensor.

Editors' Recommendations

Nadeem Sarwar
Nadeem is a tech journalist who started reading about cool smartphone tech out of curiosity and soon started writing…
You’ll be waiting a while longer for blood glucose tracking on smartwatches
Post-walk fitness data on the Apple Watch Series 9.

Apple Watch Series 9 Andy Boxall / Digital Trends
Apple and Samsung — the two titans of the smartwatch industry — are chasing a new feature that would allow a smartwatch to measure the glucose levels in your blood. But the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)  is already concerned about misleading marketing tactics, even though the feature is yet to appear on a commercially available smartwatch from a well-known brand.
“The FDA has not authorized, cleared, or approved any smartwatch or smart ring that is intended to measure or estimate blood glucose values on its own,” says the regulatory agency. As such, the agency has asked users that they should refrain from buying or using smartwatches or rings that claim to measure the sugar levels in the bloodstream. 
Right now, there are medical-grade devices out there that can measure blood glucose levels, but most of them rely on an invasive method where a small puncture is required to draw out a blood sample and then analyze it. Noninvasive blood glucose monitoring has remained elusive so far, especially in a miniaturized form that is suitable for smartwatches.

In 2020, Samsung announced that it had developed a noninvasive method for blood glucose level measurement in partnership with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Samsung didn’t specify whether the tech would make its way to a smartwatch, but multiple reports claimed that Samsung is exploring the tech for its smartwatches. 
Apple, on the other hand, is also said to be working toward the same goal. Rumors suggest that noninvasive blood glucose level analysis could arrive as a marquee new addition for the t10th-generation Apple Watch slated to hit the shelves later this year. 
Assuming the tech eventually makes it to the market later this year, it would start a mad race where every player would want to advertise that health facility for their own product. And that would mean misleading marketing claims, which is already a worrisome reality. It seems the FDA has already braced for the onslaught and has, therefore, made it clear that it hasn’t certified any such tech -- from Apple or any other consumer electronics brand whatsoever. 

Read more
This is the OnePlus Watch 2, and it looks incredible
Black and green variants of the OnePlus Watch 2.

OnePlus has just dropped the first official look at its upcoming smartwatch ahead of the official reveal later this month at Mobile World Congress 2024. But more than looks, what really caught our attention was the brand’s bold claims about battery life.

“With up to 100-hour battery life in Smart Mode, it sets a new industry standard, ensuring that your watch keeps pace with your life, uninterrupted,” says the company. Now, that’s a rather ambitious claim, irrespective of the operating system  that powers the watch.

Read more
One of the biggest smartwatch makers just gave up on Wear OS
Fossil Gen 5 watch face.

The first smartwatch I recall buying from a lifestyle outlet, and not a smartphone or multi-branded electronics store, was the Fossil Gen 5 Carlyle. It was a conscious decision, as I didn’t want to wear a Fitbit or the Apple Watch to parties or family events like some frumpish tech nerd. Those days are officially over, as Fossil has decided to quit the smartwatch business.
The global fashion brand tells The Verge that the Fossil Gen 6 — which got a Wellness Edition refresh in 2022 — was its last smartwatch. “As the smartwatch landscape has evolved significantly over the past few years, we have made the strategic decision to exit the smartwatch business,” Fossil COO Jeff Boyer told the outlet.
The company says it will continue supporting its existing Wear OS smartwatches portfolio for the “next few years.” Unfortunately, “existing” and “few” are rather flexible terms here, and not necessarily in a good way.

A Fossil flagship store executive tells Digital Trends that the current-gen, Gen 6 will get software updates for two years. When asked to clarify whether that includes annual Wear OS updates or just security-centric updates, the executive declined to offer any more details.
On inquiring about the older-generation Fossil Gen 5 smartwatches and whether they will also get the same treatment, we were told that they are awaiting more clarity on that. However, it’s a bleak picture. The Fossil Gen 6 (with the Snapdragon Wear 4100+ chip inside) is already a generational laggard in Qualcomm’s portfolio, while the Fossil Gen 5 series relies on an even older Snapdragon Wear 3100 silicon.

Read more